Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-criteria decision making approach based on PROMETHEE with probabilistic simplified neutrosophic sets

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Probabilistic simplified neutrosophic set \( \left( {PSNS} \right) \) is an important tool to describe the vagueness existing in the real life. In this study, we define a PSNS and discuss some of theoretical set operations of \( PSNSs \). Also we propose the concepts of module on \( PSNSs \), as well as inner product and projection operator between two \( PSNSs \). In relation to this new set, we introduce a probabilistic simplified neutrosophic number \( \left( {PSNN} \right) \). A \( PSNN \) has three components which is called probabilistic-valued truth membership degree, probabilistic-valued indeterminacy membership degree and probabilistic-valued falsity membership degree, respectively. We give some of algebraic operational rules, a score function and an accuracy function on \( PSNNs \). Furthermore, we introduce two aggregation operators called the probabilistic simplified neutrosophic weighted arithmetic average operator and the probabilistic simplified weighted geometric average operator on \( PSNNs \). Furthermore, we determine weights of criteria with a method that is based on fuzzy measure and develop a method based on preference function to determine weight of each decision maker. We present an extended PROMETHEE method based on \( PSNSs \) for group decision problems. Finally, as an application of this theory, we give a practice on a multi-criteria group decision making problem based on \( PSNNs \) by using extended PROMETHEE method to ensure stability of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed M, Hussien AN et al (2018) A novel group decision-making model based on triangular neutrosophic numbers. Soft Comput 22:6629–6643

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun R, Roy B, Sussman B (1969) ELECTRE: une méthode pour guider le choix en présence de points de vue multiples. Rev Franaise Informat Recherche Opérationnelle 3:31–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2016) TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Comput Appl 27(3):727–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolturk E, Kahraman C (2018) A novel interval-valued neutrosophic AHP with cosine similarity measure. Soft Comput 22(15):4941–4958

    Google Scholar 

  • Broumi S, Talea M, Bakali A, Smarandache F (2016a) Single valued neutrosophic graphs. J New Theory 10:86–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Broumi S, Talea M, Bakali A, Smarandache F (2016b) On bipolar single valued neutrosophic graphs. J New Theory 11:84–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Pap E, Prade H (2000) Hybrid probabilistic–possibilistic mixtures and utility functions. In: Fodor J, de Baets B, Perny P (eds) Preferences and decisions under incomplete knowledge”, volume 51 of studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 51. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch M, Marichal JL, Mesiar R, Pap E (2009) Aggregation functions, encyclopedia of mathematics and ıts applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 127

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In: Günter F, Walter T (eds) Multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin, pp 58–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaşan A, Kahraman C (2018) A novel interval-valued neutrosophic EDAS method: prioritization of the United Nations national sustainable development goals. Soft Comput 22(15):4891–4906

    Google Scholar 

  • Küçük GD, Şahin R (2018) A novel hybrid approach for simplified neutrosophic decision-making with completely unknown weight information. Int J Uncertain Quantif 8(2):161–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HW, Wang GJ (2007) Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Eur J Oper Res 179(1):220–233

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar P, Samanta SK (2014) On similarity and entropy of neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(3):1245–1252

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mareschal B, Vincke JP (1984) PROMETHEE a new family of outranking methods in multi criteria analysis. Brans JP Oper Res 84:477–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed M, Abdel-Baset M, Zaied ANH, Smarandache F (2017) Neutrosophic integer programming problem. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 15:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2002) Multi-criteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 17(3):211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Pap E (1995) Null-additive set functions, mathematics and its applications, vol 337. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pap E (1997) Pseudo-analysis as a mathematical base for soft computing. Soft Comput 1:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng JJ, Wang JQ, Zhang HY, Chen XH (2014) An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision making problems with simplified neutrosophic sets. Appl Soft Comput 25:336–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng JJ, Wang JQ, Wang J, Zhang HY, Chen XH (2016) Simplified neutrosophic sets and their applications in multi-criteria group decision-making problems. Int J Syst Sci 47(10):2342–2358

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin R (2017) Normal neutrosophic multiple attribute decision making based on generalized prioritized aggregation operators. Neural Comput Appl 30:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Şahin R (2019) An approach to neutrosophic graph theory with applications. Soft Comput 23:569–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Şahin R, Küçük A (2015) Subsethood measure for single valued neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(2):525–530

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin R, Liu P (2016) Maximizing deviation method for neutrosophic multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information. Neural Comput Appl 27(7):2017–2029

    Google Scholar 

  • Şahin R, Liu P (2017a) Some approaches to multi-criteria decision making based on exponential operations of simplified neutrosophic numbers. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32(3):2083–2099

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin R, Liu P (2017b) Possibility-induced simplified neutrosophic aggregation operators and their application to multi-criteria group decision-making. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 29(4):769–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinoj TK, John SJ (2012) Intuitionistic fuzzy multisets and its application in medical diagnosis. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 6(1):1418–1421

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache F (1999) A unifying field in logics: neutrosophic logic. In: Bourget D, Chalmers D (eds) Philosophy. American Research Press, New York, pp 1–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotirov S, Sotirova E, Orozova D (2009) Neural network for defining intuitionistic fuzzy sets in e-learning. Notes Intuit Fuzzy Sets 15(2):33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugeno M (1974) Theory of fuzzy integral and its application. Doctoral thesis. Tokyo Institute of Technology

  • Tian Z, Wang J, Wang J et al (2017) Simplified neutrosophic linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making approach to green product development. Group Decis Negot 26:597

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Klir GJ (1992) Fuzzy measure theory. Plenium Press, New York, p 354

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Madiraju P, Zhang Y, Sunderraman R (2004) Interval neutrosophic sets and logic: theory and applications in computing. Hexis, Arizona

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang Y, Sunderraman R (2005) Single valued neutrosophic sets. In: Proceeding of 10th 476 international conference on fuzzy theory and technology

  • Ye J (2013) Multi-criteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Int J Gen Syst 42(4):386–394

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ye J (2014a) A multi-criteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(5):2459–2466

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ye J (2014b) Similarity measures between interval neutrosophic sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(1):165–172

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ye J (2014c) Single valued neutrosophic cross-entropy for multi-criteria decision making problems. Appl Math Model 38(3):1170–1175

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ye J (2018) Operations and aggregation method of neutrosophic cubic numbers for multiple attribute decision-making. Soft Comput 22:7435–7444

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye J, Zhang QS (2014) Single valued neutrosophic similarity measures for multiple attribute decision making. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 2:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HY, Wang JQ, Chen XH (2014) Interval neutrosophic sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making problems. Sci World J 2014:645953

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HY, Ji P, Wang JQ, Chen XH (2015) An improved weighted correlation coefficient based on integrated weight for interval neutrosophic sets and its application in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Int J Comput Intell Syst 8(6):1027–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Wang J, Chen X (2016) An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems with interval-valued neutrosophic sets. Neural Comput Appl 27(3):615–627

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rıdvan Şahin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interests that represent a conflict of interests in connection with this manuscript. There are no professional or other personal interests that can inappropriately influence our submitted work.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altun, F., Şahin, R. & Güler, C. Multi-criteria decision making approach based on PROMETHEE with probabilistic simplified neutrosophic sets. Soft Comput 24, 4899–4915 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04244-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04244-4

Keywords

Navigation