Skip to main content
Log in

A low-carbon-orient product design schemes MCDM method hybridizing interval hesitant fuzzy set entropy theory and coupling network analysis

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The product low-carbon design is the key to decrease carbon emissions in manufacturing. The multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) method has been widely used in solving the design schemes preference choosing problems. However, the existed MCDM method has two primary problems facing the product low-carbon design cases: (i) How to clarify the coupling relationship between low-carbon decision criteria? (ii) How to fuzzily express the low-carbon-orient product design schemes? To solve these problems, we proposed a novel MCDM method for product low-carbon design. It combines the coupling network analysis with the interval hesitant fuzzy set entropy theory into MCDM process. We used a case study of injection molding machine low-carbon design to verify the proposed MCDM method. It turns out that the proposed MCDM method can help us make more rational and equitable decisions among alternative low-carbon schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atanassov KT (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg, pp 1–137

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Hong JA (2014) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets and the TOPSIS method. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 44(12):1665–1673

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Didier D, Henri P (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Academic, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du Y, Yi Q, Li C (2015) Life cycle oriented low-carbon operation models of machinery manufacturing industry. J Clean Prod 91:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimnejad S, Mousavi SM, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2014) Risk ranking in mega projects by fuzzy compromise approach: a comparative analysis. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(2):949–959

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy DC, Krishnamurty S, Grosse IR (2015) A predictive modeling-based material selection method for sustainable product design. J Eng Des 26(10–12):365–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan JL, Ma YL (2002) Some new fuzzy entropy formulas. Fuzzy Set Syst 128(2):277–284

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia B (2013) Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 240(10):129–144

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia B (2014) A series of score functions for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 277(2):102–110

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gau WL, Buehrer DJ (1993) Vague sets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(2):610–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gou X, Xu Z, Liao H (2016) Multiple criteria decision making based on Bonferroni means with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Soft Comput 21(21):6515–6529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gou X, Xu Z, Liao H (2017) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy and cross-entropy measures and alternative queuing method for multiple criteria decision making. Inf Sci 388–389:225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul M, Celik E, Aydin N (2016) A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Appl Soft Comput 46(C):60–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Su C, Liang S (2008) Fuzzy case-based reasoning for conflict resolution in collaborative design. In: Isecs international colloquium on computing, communication, control, and management. 4–5 August, Guangzhou, China

  • Johannessen LK, Ellingsen G (2014) Lightweight design methods in integrated practices. Des Issues 28(3):22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Chung ES (2013) Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South Korea. Appl Math Model 37(22):9419–9430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu P, Kar S, Maiti M (2014) A fuzzy MCDM method and an application to solid transportation problem with mode preference. Soft Comput 18(9):1853–1864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontief WW (1952) Input–output economics. Sci Am 3(2):30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling X, Zhang Y (2011) Operations on triangle type-2 fuzzy sets. Procedia Eng 15(1):3346–3350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RE, Blair PD (2009) Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. Cambridge University, Cambridge, pp 1293–1304

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore R, Lodwick W (2003) Interval analysis and fuzzy set theory. Fuzzy Set Syst 135(1):5–9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Novita S, Zahari T, Salwa H, Abdul R (2013) Optimal multi-material selection for lightweight design of automotive body assembly incorporating recyclability. Mater Des 50(17):846–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun P, Liu Y, Qiu X (2015) Hybrid multiple attribute group decision-making for power system restoration. Expert Syst Appl 42(19):6795–6805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2001) Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 118(3):467–477

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tan WW, Chua TW (2007) Uncertain rule-based fuzzy logic systems: introduction and new directions (Mendel, J.M.; 2001) [book review]. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 2(1):72–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian J, Chen M (2014) Sustainable design for automotive products: dismantling and recycling of end-of-life vehicles. Waste Manag 34(2):458–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(6):529–539

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Chiang CH, Li CW (2007) Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst Appl 32(4):1028–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Shen W, Xie H (2002) Collaborative conceptual design—state of the art and future trends. Comput Aided Des 34(13):981–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G (2012) Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl Based Syst 31(7):176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann T, Minx J (2008) A definition of “carbon footprint”. Ecological Economics Research Trends, Pertsova C C. Nova Science Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia M, Xu Z (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2003) A priority method for triangular fuzzy number complementary judgement matrix. Syst Eng Theory Pract 23(10):86–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS, Da QL (2001) Research on ranking method of interval number. Syst Eng 19(6):94–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Xia M (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181(11):2128–2138

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Xia M (2012) Hesitant fuzzy entropy and cross-entropy and their use in multiattribute decision-making. Int J Intell Syst 27(9):799–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZZ, Wang YS, Teng ZR (2015) Low-carbon product multi-objective optimization design for meeting requirements of enterprise, user and government. J Clean Prod 103:747–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan J, Feng C (2011) Sustainability-oriented product modular design using design structure matrix (DSM) method. Appl Mech Mater 128–129:1468–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Newman MW, Forlizzi J (2014) Making sustainability sustainable: challenges in the design of eco-interaction technologies. In: Sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. Toronto, Canada

  • Yuan F, Song WZ, Peterson N (2008) A lightweight sensor network management system design. In: Sixth IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications. IEEE Computer Society, Hong Kong, China

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—III. Inf Sci 9(1):43–80

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z (2013) Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 234(10):150–181

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFB1700700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51375437), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51875516), the Youth Funds of the Fluid Power and Mechatronic System of Zhejiang University (SKLoFP_QN_1702), and the Collaborative Innovation Center of High-end Manufacturing Equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lemiao Qiu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Zhang, S., Qiu, L. et al. A low-carbon-orient product design schemes MCDM method hybridizing interval hesitant fuzzy set entropy theory and coupling network analysis. Soft Comput 24, 5389–5408 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04296-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04296-6

Keywords

Navigation