Skip to main content
Log in

Technological information extraction of free form surfaces using neural networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show how to predict the accurate machining technology for the particular free form NURBS or B-spline surface. Since that kind of a surface is very hard to describe in an analytical manner, the topological and geometrical information about the surface was acquired with the help of self-organized neural networks (NNs) and first- or second-order statistic parameters. It is proved that the most significant parameter in this process is the curvature, especially when rapid changes of curvature on a free form surface occurred. As the Gaussian distribution of surface curvatures and slope gradient data were presumed, the mean and variance was used for one-dimensional data presentation, and the Hebbian output data vector was used to assess probability, density function and distribution of the presented data. For collecting the maximum amount of surface information, the principal component analysis method inside the Hebbian NN was used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Austin SP, Jerard RB, Drysdale RL (1997) Comparison of discretization algorithms for NURBS surfaces with application to numerically controlled machining. Comput Aided Des 29(1):77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Böhm J, Brenner C (2004) Curvature based range image classification for machining object recognition. Institute for Photogrammetry, University of Stuttgart, Germany

  3. Cover T, Thomas J (1991) Elements of information theory. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Diamantaras K, Kung S (1996) Principal component analysis networks. Theory and applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elber G (1994) Free form surface region optimization for three and five axis milling, Technical report CIS9403. Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel

  6. Fisher J, Lowther J, Shene CK (2004) If You Know BSplines Well, You Also Know NURBS!. Department of Computer Science Michigan Technological University, SIGCSE’04

  7. Flynn P, Jain A (1989) On reliable curvature estimation. In: IEEE Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp 110–116

  8. Gordon GG (1990) Face recognition based on depth maps and surface curvature. Harvard Robotics Laboratory Technical report MA 02138, Harvard University

  9. Higashi M, Tsutamori H, Hosaka M (1996) Generation of smooth surfaces by controlling curvature variation, vol 15. Eurographics Associations, Toyota Technological Institute, 2-12-1, Hisakata, Nagoya468, Japan

  10. Ip CY, Lapadat D, Sieger L, Regli WC Using shape distribution to compare solid models; URL: http://www.mcs.drexel.edu/∼regli. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Drexel University

  11. Ko KH (2003) Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Free-Form Object Matching. Master thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA

  12. Korosec M (2003) Optimization of free form surface machining, using neural networks. Dissertation, University of Maribor, Faculty of technical engineering

  13. Korosec M, Balic J, Kopac J (2005) Neural network based manufacturability evaluation of free form machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(1):13–20. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.06.022 [COBISS.SI-ID 8975894]

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lilienblum T, Albrecht P, Michaelis B (1996) Improvement of 3D data by neural networks in free form machining.In: Proceeding International Workshop on Neural Networks for Identification, pp203–211

  15. Litvin A, Karl WC (2004) Using shape distributions as priors in a curve evolution framework. In: Proceeding of IS&T/SPIE 16th Annual Symposium Electronic Imaging Science and Technology, San Jose, CA

  16. Martin R (1998) Estimation of principal curvatures from range data. Int J Shape Model 3(4):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Onwubolu GC (1999) Manufacturing features recognition using backpropagation neural networks. J Intell Manuf 10:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Osada R, Funkhouser T, Chazelle B, Dobkin D (2001) Matching 3D models with shape distributions in free form machining. In: International conference on shape modeling and applications. IEEE Computer Society Press, Genova, Italy, pp154–166

  19. Principe JC, Euliano NR, Lefebvre WC (2000) Neural and adaptive systems, Fundamentals through simulations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stokely EM, Wu SY (1992) Surface parameterization and curvature measurement of arbitrary 3D objects: five practical methods. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(8):833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yinghua W (2004) New approaches for computing tolerance zones of 3D CAD models. Master thesis, Institute for Engineering Design Technische Universität Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Germany

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjan Korosec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korosec, M. Technological information extraction of free form surfaces using neural networks. Neural Comput & Applic 16, 453–463 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-006-0071-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-006-0071-9

Keywords

Navigation