Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy rule-base driven orthogonal approximation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, orthogonal approximation concept is applied to fuzzy systems. We propose a new useful model adapted from the well-known Sugeno type fuzzy system. The proposed fuzzy model is a generalization of the zero-order Sugeno fuzzy system model. Instead of linear functions in standard Sugeno model, we use nonlinear functions in the consequent part. The nonlinear functions are selected from a trigonometric orthogonal basis. Orthogonal function parameters are trained along with the Sugeno fuzzy system. The proposed model is demonstrated using three simulations—a nonlinear piecewise-continuous scalar function modeling and filtering, nonlinear dynamic system identification, and time series prediction. Finally some performance comparisons are carried out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang L-X, Mendel JM (1992) Fuzzy basis functions, universal approximation, and orthogonal least squares learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3:807–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yen J, Wang L (1999) Simplifying fuzzy rule-based models using orthogonal transformation methods. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part B Cybern 1(29):13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang L, Langari R (1995) Building Sugeno-type models using fuzzy discretization and orthogonal parameter estimation technique. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 3(4):454–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campello RJGB, Amaral WC (2002) Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy models within orthonormal basis function framework and their application to process control. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, FUZZ-IEEE’02, vol 2, pp 1399–1404

  5. Campello RJGB, Von Zuben FJ, Amaral WC, Meleiro LAC, Filho RM (2003) Hierarchical fuzzy models within the framework of orthonormal basis function and their application to bioprocess control. Chem Eng Sci 58:4259–4270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lotfi A, Howarth M, Hull JB (2000) Orthogonal rule-based systems: selection of optimum rules. Neural Comput Appl 9:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong X, Harris CJ (2001) A Neurofuzzy network knowledge extraction and extended Gram-Schmidt algorithm for model subspace decomposition. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 11:528–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho DWC, Zhang P-An (2001) Fuzzy wavelet networks for functional learning. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 9:200–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee C-H (2004) Fuzzy Fourier systems for periodic function mapping. J Fuzzy Math 12:933–944

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee C-H, Lin Y-C (2005) An adaptive neuro-fuzzy filter design via periodic fuzzy neural network. Signal Process 85:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fausett LV (1999) Applied numerical analysis using Matlab, vol 10. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 332–337

  12. Jang J-SR, Sun C-T, Mizutani E (1997) Neuro Fuzzy and soft computing, vol 4. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 73–84

  13. Jang J-SR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23:665–685

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen C-S, Tseng C-S (2004) Performance comparison between the training method and the numerical method of the orthogonal neural network in function approximation. Int J Intell Syst 19:1257–1275

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ljung L (1999) System identification theory for the user. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 149–151

  16. Zhang Q, Benveniste A (1992) Wavelet networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3:889–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakamura S (1991) Applied numerical methods with software. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Becerikli Y, Oysal Y (2004) Modeling and prediction with time delay dynamic neural networks. In: 12th Mediterranean conference on control and automation MED’04, Kuşadası, Turkey, 6–9 June 2004

  19. Alci M (1999) Gradient based Fuzzy logic systems depending on training. Ph.D. thesis, SAU

  20. Becerikli Y (2004) On three intelligent systems: dynamic neural, Fuzzy and wavelet networks for training trajectory. Neural Comput Appl (NC&A) 13(4):339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsoi AC, Tan S (1997) Recurrent neural networks: a constructive algorithm, and its properties. Neurocomputing 15:309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alci M, Becerikli Y, Asyali MH (2005) Orthogonal fuzzy system approximation and its application to time series prediction. Turkish symposium on artificial intelligence & neural networks, TAINN 2005, 16–17. Çeşme, İzmir, Turkey

  23. Chapra SC, Canale RP (1989) Numerical methods for engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Musa Alci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alci, M. Fuzzy rule-base driven orthogonal approximation. Neural Comput & Applic 17, 501–507 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-007-0146-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-007-0146-2

Keywords

Navigation