Skip to main content
Log in

Glocalization pursuit support vector machine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Graph-based methods have aroused wide interest in pattern recognition and machine learning, which capture the structural information in data into classifier design through defining a graph over the data and assuming label smoothness over the graph. Laplacian Support Vector Machine (LapSVM) is a representative of these methods and an extension of the traditional SVM by optimizing a new objective additionally appended Laplacian regularizer. The regularizer utilizes the local linear patches to approximate the data manifold structure and assumes the same label of the data on each patch. Though LapSVM has shown more effective classification performance than SVM experimentally, it in fact concerns more the locality than the globality of data manifold due to the Laplacian regularizer itself. As a result, LapSVM is relatively sensitive to the local change of the data and cannot characterize the manifold quite faithfully. In this paper, we design an alternative regularizer, termed as Glocalization Pursuit Regularizer. The new regularizer introduces a natural global structure measure to grasp the global and local manifold information as simultaneously as possible, which can be proved to make the representation of the manifold more compact than the Laplacian regularizer. We further introduce the new regularizer into SVM to develop an alternative graph-based SVM, called as Glocalization Pursuit Support Vector Machine (GPSVM). GPSVM not only inherits the advantages of both SVM and LapSVM but also uses the structural information more reasonably to guide the classifier design. The experiments both on the toy and real-world datasets demonstrate the better classification performance of our proposed GPSVM compared with SVM and LapSVM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu X (2008) Semi-supervised learning literature survey. Technical report, 1530, Madison: Department of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin

  2. Bousquet O, Chapelle O, Hein M (2003) Measure based regularization. NIPS, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xue H, Chen S, Zeng X (2008) Classifier learning with a new locality regularization method. Pattern Recogn 41(5):1496–1507

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xue H, Chen S, Yang Q (2009) Discriminatively regularized least-squares classification. Pattern Recogn 42(1):93–104

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu M, Schölkopf B (2007) Transductive classification via local learning regularization. Eleventh international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics (AISTATS)

  6. Haykin S (2001) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang T (2004) Statistical behavior and consistency of classification methods based on convex risk minimization. Ann Stat 32:56–85

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang T (2004) Statistical analysis of some multicategory large margin classification methods. J Mach Learn Res 5:1225–1251

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosasco L, Vito ED, Caponnetto A, Piana M, Verri A (2004) Are loss functions all the same? Neural Comput 16(5):1063–1076

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosset S, Zhu J, Hastie T (2003) Margin maximizing loss functions. NIPS, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Z, Haykin S (2002) On different facets of regularization theory. Neural Comput 14(12):2791–2846

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Belkin M, Niyogi P Laplacian (2001) Eigenmaps and spectral technique for embedding and clustering. NIPS, 15: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  13. Belkin M, Niyogi P, Sindhwani V (2005) On mainfold regularization. In: Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on artificial intelligence and statistics (AISTATS), Savannah Hotel, Barbados, 17–24

  14. Zhou D, Bousquet O, Lal TN, Weston J, Schölkopf B (2004) Learning with local and global consistency. In: Thrun S, Saul L, Scholkopf B (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 16. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 321–328

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holder LB, Cook DJ (2003) Graph-based relational learning: current and future directions. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 5(1):90–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cook DJ, Holder LB (2000) Graph-based data mining. IEEE Intell Syst 15:32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu X (2005) Semi-supervised learning with graphs. PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University. CMU-LTI-05-192

  18. Belkin M, Matveeva I, P. Niyogi (2004) Regularization and semi-supervised learning on large graphs. COLT

  19. Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2004) An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu X, Ghahramani Z, Lafferty J (2003) Semi-supervised learning using Gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on machine learning (ICML’03), Washington, DC, 912–919

  22. Zhu X, Ghahramani Z (2002) Towards semi-supervised classification with Markov random fields. Technical report CMU-CALD-02-106. Carnegie Mellon University

  23. Belkin M, Niyogi P, Sindhwani V (2004) Manifold regularization: A geometric framework for learning from examples. Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, Tech. Rep: TR-2004-06

  24. Xue H, Chen S (2007) Alternative robust local embedding. In: The international conference on wavelet analysis and pattern recognition (ICWAPR), 591–596

  25. Roweis ST, Saul LK (2000) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290(22):2323–2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schölkopf B, Smola AJ (2002) Learning with Kernels. 644. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  27. Belkin M (2003) Problems of learning on manifolds. PhD Thesis, The University of Chicago

  28. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xue H, Chen S, Yang Q (2008) Structural support vector machine. In: The 15th international symposium on neural networks (ISNN), Part I, LNCS, vol 5263, pp 501–511

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grant Nos. 60773061, 60905002, 60973097 and 61035003) and Natural Science Foundations of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant No. BK2008381).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Songcan Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xue, H., Chen, S. Glocalization pursuit support vector machine. Neural Comput & Applic 20, 1043–1053 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-010-0448-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-010-0448-7

Keywords

Navigation