Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of feed abrasive value by artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to evaluate rapid testing methods based on the relationship between feed abrasive value (FAV) and physicochemical properties (particle size, bulk density, dry matter (DM), soluble dry matter, water-holding capacity (WHC), ash, crud protein, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), physically effective NDF and non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC)), 100 empirical dataset were used. Relationships were investigated using multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANNs). The mean relative error was significantly (P < 0.01) lower for ANN than MLR model. Globally, the non-linear ANN model approach is shown to provide a better prediction of FAV than linear multiple regression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGavin MD, Morrill JL (1976) Scanning electron microscopy of ruminal papillae in calves fed various amounts and forms of roughage. Am J Vet Res 37:497

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gilliland RL, Bush LJ, Friend JD (1962) Relation of ration composition to rumen development in early-weaned dairy calves with observations on ruminal parakeratosis. J Dairy Sci 45:1211–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rickard MD, Ternouth JH (1965) The effect of the increased dietary volatile fatty acids on the morphological and physiological development of lambs with particular reference to the rumen. J Agric Sci 65:371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beharka AA, Nagaraja TG, Morrill JL, Kennedy GA, Klemm RD (1998) Effect of form of diet on anatomical, microbial, and fermentative development of the rumen of neonatal calves. J Dairy Sci 81:1946–1955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson MJ, Khoyloo M, Walters JL (1982) Effect of feeding whole cottonseed on intake, body weight, and reticulorumen development of young Holstein calves. J Dairy Sci 65:764–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zitnan R, Voigt J, Schomhusen U, Wegner J, Kokardova M, Hagemeister H, Levkut M, Kuhla S, Sommer A (1998) Influence of dietary concentrate to forage ratio on the development of rumen mucosa in calves. Arch Tierernahr 51:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenwood RH, Morrill JL, Titgemeyer EC (1997) Using dry feed intake as a percentage of initial body weight as a weaning criterion. J Dairy Sci 80:2542–2546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heinrichs J (2005) Rumen development in the dairy calf. Adv Dairy Technol 17:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwood RH, Morrill JL, Titgemeyer EC, Kennedy GA (1997) A new method of measuring diet abrasion and its effect on the development of the forestomach. J Dairy Sci 80:2534–2541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dayhoff JE (1990) Neural network architectures. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

  11. Marengo E, Bobba M, Robotti E, Liparota MC (2006) Modeling of the polluting emissions from a cement production plant by partial least squares, principal component regression, and artificial neural networks. Environ Sci Technol 40:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alp M, Cigizoglu HK (2007) Suspended sediment load simulation by two artificial neural network methods using hydrometeorological data. Environ Model Softw 22:2–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giger-Reverdin S (2000) Characterization of feedstuffs for ruminants using some physical parameters. Anim Feed Sci Technol 86:53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (2002) Official methods of analysis, vol 1, 17th edn. AOAC, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharide in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. National Research Council (NRC) (2001) Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th rev edn. Natl Acad Sci, Washington, DC

  17. Kononoff PJ (2002) The effect of ration particle size on dairy cows in early lactation. Ph.D. Thesis. The Pennsylvania State University

  18. Mertens DR (1997) Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 80:1463–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cybenko GC (1989) Approximations by super positions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signals Syst 2(3):303–314

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Berry MJA, Linoff G (1997) Data mining techniques. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaps M, Lamberson WR (2004) Biosatistical for animal science. Cabi Publishing, New Jersey

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Norouzian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norouzian, M.A., Asadpour, S. Prediction of feed abrasive value by artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression. Neural Comput & Applic 21, 905–909 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0579-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0579-5

Keywords

Navigation