Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictability and forecasting automotive price based on a hybrid train algorithm of MLP neural network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, using the Hurst exponent value H, we first show that the automotive price in Iran Khodro Company (IRAN) is predictable and therefore a good forecasting can be done using neural networks. We then introduce a new global and fast hybrid multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP-NN) in order to forecast the automotive price. In our new framework, we hybridize the genetic algorithm (GA) and least square (LS) method in order to train the connected weights of the network, which leads us to have a global and fast network. To do so, the connected weights between input and hidden layers are trained by GA and the connected weights between the hidden and output layers are trained by LS method. We finally apply our new MLP-NN to forecast the automotive price in Iran Khodro Company, which is the biggest automotive manufacturing in IRAN. The results are well promising compared with the cases when we apply the GA and LS individually. We also compare the results with the case when we employ the gradient-based optimization techniques such as Levenberg–Marquardt method as well as some heuristic algorithms such as extended tabu search algorithm instead of LS method and hybridization of MLP-LM with GA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alba E, Chicano JF (2004) Training neural networks with GA hybrid algorithms. In: Deb K (ed) Proceedings of GECCO’04, Seattle, Washington, LNCS 3102, pp 852–863

  2. Atakulerka A, Sutivany D (2007) Avoiding local minima in feed forward neural networks by simulation learning. In: Australian conference on artificial intelligence, pp 100–109

  3. Battiti R (1992) First and second-order methods for learning: between steepest descent and Newton’s method. Neural Comput 4(2):141–166

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bouchard M (2001) Faster convergence and improved performance in least-square training of neural networks for active sound cancellation. Proc Int Conf Art Neural Netw 2130:583–592

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charalambous C (1992) Conjugate gradient algorithm for efficient training of artificial neural networks. Circuits, devices and systems. IEEE Proc 139(3):301–310

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chow TWS, Cho SY (2007) Neural networks and computing. Imperial College Press, London

  7. Goldberg D (1988) Genetic algorithms in machine learning, optimization and search. Addison-Wesley, Longman Publishing Co., Boston

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg PE (1989) Genetic algorithms on search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison, Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hagan MT, Menhaj M (1994) Training feed forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(6):989–993

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haupt RL, Haupt SE (2004) Practical genetic algorithms. Wiley, New York

  11. Haykin S (1994) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Macmillan, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hurst HE (1951) Long-term capacity storage of reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civil Eng 116:770–799

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim D, Kim H, Chung D (2005) A modified genetic algorithm for fast training neural networks, vol 3496. Springer, Berlin, pp 660–665

  14. Krose B, Smagt PVD (1996) An introduction to neural networks. The University of Amsterdam

  15. Masters T (1995) Advanced algorithms for neural networks. Wiley, New York

  16. Mc Loone SF, Irwin GW (1997) Fast parallel off-line training of multilayer perceptrons. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 8(3):646–653

    Google Scholar 

  17. McNelis PD (2005) Neural networks in finance: gaining predictive edge in the market. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington

  18. Montana DJ, Davis L (1989) Training feed forward neural networks using genetic algorithms. Proc Int Joint Conf Art Intelligence, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Otair MA, Salameh WA (2004) An improved back-propagation neural networks using a modified non-linear function. Proceedings of the IASTED international conference, Inn Sbruck, Australian, pp 442–447

  20. Pan S, Lai C (2006) Identification of chaotic systems by neural network with hybrid learning algorithm. Chaosm Solitons Fractals 37(1):233–244

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pasti R, De Castro L (2006) An immune and a gradient-based method to train multilayer perceptron neural networks. International joint conference on neural networks, pp 2075–2082

  22. Peyghami MR, Khanduzi R (2011) A hybrid model based on neural network and hybrid genetic algorithm for automotive price forecasting. Int J Appl Math Comput 3(1)

  23. Prudencio RBC, Ludermir TB (2002) Neural network hybrid learning: genetic algorithms & Levenberg-Marquardt. In: 26th annual conference of the gesellschaft for classification, Heidelberg, Berlin

  24. Qian B, Rasheed K (2004) Hurst exponent and financial market predictability. The IASTED conference on financial engineering and applications, Palma de Mallorca, Spain

  25. Rojas R (1996) Neural networks. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Salzano M (2005) Neural networks as tools for increasing the forecast and control of complex economic systems. Econom Complex 2(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sexton RS, Alidaee B, Dorsey RE, Johnson JD (1998) Global optimization for artificial neural networks: a tabu search application. Eur J Oper Res 106:570–584

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Shafiabadi N, Teshnelab M, Aliyari Shooredeh M (2006) A comparison of PSO and back propagation combined with LS and RLS in identification using fuzzy neural networks. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Mumbai, India

  29. Siddique MNH, Tokhi MO (2001) Training neural network: back propagation vs genetic algorithms. Int Joint Conf Neural Netw 4:2673–2678

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thiesing FM, Vornberger O (1997) Sales forecasting using neural networks. IEEE Proc 4:2125–2128

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang RL, Tang Z, Cao QP (2003) An efficient approximation algorithm for finding a maximum clique using hopfield network learning. Neural Comput 15(7):1605–1619

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilamowski BM, Iplikci S, Kaynak O, Efe MO (2001) An algorithm for fast convergence in training neural networks. Int Joint Conf Neural Netw 3:1778–1782

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yam YF, Chow TWS (1995) Accelerated training algorithm for feed forward neural networks based on least squares method. Neural Process Lett 2(4):20–25

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang GP (2004) Neural Networks in Business Forecasting. IRM Press (an important of Idea Group Inc)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was in part supported by a grant from IPM (No. 88900027) for the first author. The authors would like to thank the research council of K.N. Toosi University of Technology for supporting this research. The work also has been supported by Research and Development office of IRAN Khodro Company for the second author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Reza Peyghami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peyghami, M.R., Khanduzi, R. Predictability and forecasting automotive price based on a hybrid train algorithm of MLP neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 21, 125–132 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0605-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0605-7

Keywords

Navigation