Skip to main content
Log in

An artificial neural network model to characterize porosity defects during solidification of A356 aluminum alloy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a data-driven multilayer perceptron-based neural network model has been developed to predict the percentage of total porosity and mechanical properties, namely yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and percentage of elongation during the solidification of A356 aluminum alloy. Some of the important processing parameters such as cooling rate, solidus velocity, thermal gradient and initial hydrogen content have been considered as inputs to this model. The network training architecture has been optimized using the gradient-based Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno training algorithm to minimize the network training error within few training cycles. Parametric sensitivity analysis is carried out to characterize the influence of processing parameters (inputs) on the behavior of porosity formation and simultaneously, the tensile properties of A356 alloy castings. It has been observed that initial hydrogen content in the melt and cooling rate has significant influence on the porosity formation and eventually on the tensile properties of the cast product. There has been an excellent agreement between artificial neural network predictions and the target (measured) values of porosity and the tensile properties as depicted by the regression fit between these values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eady JA, Smith DM (1986) The effect of porosity on the tensile properties of Al-alloy castings. Mater Forum 9:217–223

    Google Scholar 

  2. Couper MJ, Nelson AE, Griffiths JR (1990) Casting defects and the fatigue behavior of Al casting alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 13:213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee PD, Major JF, Hofmann L (1991) Solidification model validation for an aluminum alloy cylinder. In: Numerical simulation of casting solidification in automotive applications. TMS, pp 231–251

  4. Hofman L, Hloch H, Lee PD (1990) Mathematical modeling of the semi permanent mould casting of aluminum alloy cylinder heads and engine blocks. SAE Int Congr Expo 900657:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  5. Walther WD, Adams CM, Taylor HF (1956) Mechanism for pore formation in solidifying metals. AFS Trans 64:658–664

    Google Scholar 

  6. Piwonka TS, Flemings MC (1966) Pore formation in solidification. Trans Metall Soc AIME 236:1157–1165

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kimio K, Pehlke RD (1985) Mathematical modeling of porosity formation in solidification. RD Metall Trans 16B:359–366

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee PD, Chirazi A, See D (2001) Modeling micro porosity in aluminum alloys: a review. J Light Met 1:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee CD (2007) Effects of microporosity on tensile properties of A356 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 464:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perzyk M, Kochanski A (2003) Detection of causes of casting defects assisted by artificial neural network. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J. Eng Manuf 217:1279–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobrzański LA, Mariusz K, Jerry S, Piotr Z (2007) The use of neural networks for the classification of casting defect. Int J Comput Mater Sci Surf Eng 1:18–27

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shafyei A, Anijdan SHM, Bahrami A (2006) Prediction of porosity percent in Al–Si casting alloys using ANN. Mater Sci Eng A 431:206–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anijdan SHM, Bahrami A, Hosseini HRM, Shafyei A (2006) Using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network analyses to design an Al–Si casting alloy of minimum porosity. Mater Des 27:605–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Srinivasulu RK, Ranga JG (2009) Developing a neuro fuzzy model to predict the properties of AlSi12 alloy. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 4:63–73

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ostad M, Ali M (2011) The ANN application in FEM modeling of mechanical properties of Al–Si alloy. Appl Math Model 35:5707–5713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shabani MO, Alizadeh M, Mazahery A (2011) Modeling of mechanical properties of cast A356 alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 34:1035–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shabani MO, Mazahery A (2011) Application of finite element method for simulation of mechanical properties in A356 alloy. Int J Appl Math Mech 7:89–97

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Matthies H, Strang G (1979) The solution of non linear finite element equations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 14:1613–1626

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Nocedal J (1980) Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage. Math Comput 35:773–782

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Dennis JE, Schnabel RB (1983) Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Carlson KD, Zhiping L, Christoph B (2007) Modeling the effect of finite-rate hydrogen diffusion on porosity formation in aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans 38B:541–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee PD, Hunt JD (2001) Hydrogen porosity in directionally solidified aluminum–copper alloys: a mathematical model. Acta Mater 49:1383–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee YW, Chang E, Chieu CF (1990) Modeling of feeding behavior of solidifying Al-7Si-0.3 Mg alloy plate casting. Metall Trans 21B:715–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee PD, Hunt JD (1997) Measuring the nucleation of hydrogen porosity during the solidification of aluminum–copper alloys. Scr Mater 36:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hiromi N (2001) Prediction of porosity contents and examination of porosity formation in Al-4.4% Mg DC slab. Sci Technol Adv Mater 2:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carlson KD, Lin Z, Beckermann C, Mazurkevich G, Schneider MC (2006) Modeling of porosity formation in Aluminum alloys. In: Charles AG, Bellet M (eds) Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes-XI, TMS. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, pp 627–634

  27. Samuel AM, Samuel FH (1992) Various aspects involved in the production of low hydrogen aluminum castings. J Mater Sci 27:6533–6563

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ishita Ghosh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghosh, I., Das, S.K. & Chakraborty, N. An artificial neural network model to characterize porosity defects during solidification of A356 aluminum alloy. Neural Comput & Applic 25, 653–662 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-013-1532-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-013-1532-6

Keywords

Navigation