Skip to main content
Log in

Using mixture design and neural networks to build stock selection decision support systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are three disadvantages of weighted scoring stock selection models. First, they cannot identify the relations between weights of stock-picking concepts and performances of portfolios. Second, they cannot systematically discover the optimal combination for weights of concepts to optimize the performances. Third, they are unable to meet various investors’ preferences. This study aimed to more efficiently construct weighted scoring stock selection models to overcome these disadvantages. Since the weights of stock-picking concepts in a weighted scoring stock selection model can be regarded as components in a mixture, we used the simplex-centroid mixture design to obtain the experimental sets of weights. These sets of weights are simulated with US stock market historical data to obtain their performances. Performance prediction models were built with the simulated performance data set and artificial neural networks. Furthermore, the optimization models to reflect investors’ preferences were built up, and the performance prediction models were employed as the kernel of the optimization models, so that the optimal solutions can now be solved with optimization techniques. The empirical values of the performances of the optimal weighting combinations generated by the optimization models showed that they can meet various investors’ preferences and outperform those of S&P’s 500 not only during the training period but also during the testing period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asness CS, Moskowitz TJ, Pedersen LH (2013) Value and momentum everywhere. J Financ 68(3):929–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atsalakis GS, Valavanis KP (2009) Surveying stock market forecasting techniques—part II: soft computing methods. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5932–5941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bahrammirzaee A (2010) A comparative survey of artificial intelligence applications in finance: artificial neural networks, expert system and hybrid intelligent systems. J Neural Comput Appl 19(8):1165–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banz RW (1981) The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. J Financ Econ 9:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao Q, Leggio KB, Schniederjans MJ (2005) A comparison between Fama and French’s model and artificial neural networks in predicting the Chinese stock market. Comput Oper Res 32:2499–2512

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheh JJ, Weinberg RS, Yook KC (2013) An application of an artificial neural network investment system to predict takeover targets. J Appl Bus Res 15(4):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Choudhury S, Ghosh S, Bhattacharya A, Fernandes KJ, Tiwari MK (2014) A real time clustering and SVM based price-volatility prediction for optimal trading strategy. Neurocomputing 131:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eakins SG, Stansell SR (2003) Can value-based stock selection criteria yield superior risk-adjusted returns: an application of neural networks. Int Rev Financ Anal 12:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fama EF (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Financ 25(2):383–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fama E, French K (1998) Value versus growth: the international evidence. J Financ 53(6):1975–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hart J, Slagter E, Dijk D (2003) Stock selection strategies in emerging markets. J Empir Finance 10:105–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haykin S (2007) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Holthausen R, Larker D (1992) The prediction of stock returns using financial statement information. J Account Econ 15:373–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hong H, Lim T, Stein JC (2000) Bad news travels slowly: size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. J Financ 55(1):265–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jane CJ, Chang TC (2013) A fusion model for stock selection based on decision tree, artificial neural network and grey relational analysis. Int J Kansei Inf 4(3):115–122

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jegadeesh N, Titman S (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. J Financ 48(1):65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohanram S (2005) Separating winners from losers among low book-to-market stocks using financial statement analysis. Rev Account Stud 10(2–3):133–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Montgomery DC (2008) Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2009) Response surface methodology. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Nanda S, Ahmed P (2001) Style investing: incorporating growth characteristics in value stocks. J Portf Manag 27(1):47–59

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nanda SR, Mahanty B, Tiwari MK (2010) Clustering Indian stock market data for portfolio management. Expert Syst Appl 37(12):8793–8798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Noma M (2010) Value investing and financial statement analysis. Hitotsubashi J Commer Manag 44(1):29–46

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olson D, Mossman C (2003) Neural network forecasts of Canadian stock returns using accounting ratios. Int J Forecast 19:453–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Piotroski J (2000) Value investing: the use of historical financial statement information to separate winners from losers. J Account Res 38:1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Quah Tong-Seng (2008) DJIA stock selection assisted by neural network. Expert Syst Appl 35:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roko I, Gilli M (2008) Using economic and financial information for stock selection. CMS 5(4):317–335

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenberg B, Reid K, Lanstein R (1985) Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency. J Portf Manag 11(3):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ren N, Zargham M, Rahimi S (2006) A decision tree-based classification approach to rule extraction for security analysis. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 5(1):227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sadigh AN, Mokhtari H, Iranpoor M, Ghomi SMT (2012) Cardinality constrained portfolio optimization using a hybrid approach based on particle swarm optimization and Hopfield neural network. Adv Sci Lett 17(1):11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sorensen E, Miller K, Ooi C (2000) The decision tree approach to stock selection. J Portf Manag 27(1):42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yeh IC, Cheng WL (2010) First and second order sensitivity analysis of MLP. Neurocomputing 73(10):2225–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yeh IC, Hsu TK (2011) Growth value two-factor model. J Asset Manag 11(6):435–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Cheng Yeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, YC., Yeh, IC. Using mixture design and neural networks to build stock selection decision support systems. Neural Comput & Applic 28, 521–535 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2090-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2090-x

Keywords

Navigation