Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy neural network-based system identification of multi-storey shear buildings

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses fuzzy neural network modelling for the identification of structural parameters of multi-storey shear buildings. First the identification has been done using response of the structure subject to ambient vibration with fuzzy initial condition. Then forced vibration with horizontal displacement in fuzzified form has been used to investigate the identification procedure. The model has been developed to handle the data in fuzzified form for multi-storey shear structure, and the procedure is tested for the identification of the stiffness parameters of simple example problems using the prior values of the design parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brownjohn JMW (2003) Ambient vibration studies for system identification of tall buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(1):71–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chakraverty S, Sharma RK, Singh VP (2003) Soft-computing approach for identification of dynamic systems. J New Build Mater Constr World 9(2):50–56

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chakraverty S (2004) Modelling for identification of stiffness parameters of multi-storey structure from dynamic data. J Sci Ind Res 63(2):142–148

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chakraverty S (2005) Identification of structural parameters of multi-storey shear buildings from modal data. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(6):543–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chakraverty S (2007) Identification of structural parameters of two-storey shear buildings by the iterative training of neural networks. J Archit Sci Rev 50(4):380–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chakraverty S (2009) Vibration of plates. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 1–411

    Google Scholar 

  7. Datta AK, Shrikhande M, Paul DK (1998) System identification of buildings: a review. In: Proceedings of eleventh symposium on earthquake engineering. University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India

  8. Hegde G, Sinha R (2008) Parameter identification of torsionally coupled shear buildings from earthquake response records. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(11):313–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong AL, Betti R, Lin CC (2009) Identification of dynamic models of a building structure using multiple earthquake records. Struct Control Health Monit 16(2):178–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang CS, Hung SL, Wen CM, Tu TT (2003) A neural network approach for structural identification and diagnosis of a building from seismic response data. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(2):187–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ibanez P (1979) Review of analytical and experimental techniques for improving structural dynamic models. Weld Res Council Bull 249:1–193

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ishibuchi H, Fujioka R, Tanaka H (1992) An architecture of neural networks for input vectors of fuzzy numbers. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 1293–1300

  13. Ishibuchi H, Tanaka H, Okada H (1993) Fuzzy neural networks with fuzzy weights and fuzzy biases. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks, vol 3, pp 1650–1655

  14. Ishibuchi H, Morioka K, Tanaka H (1994) A fuzzy neural network with trapezoid fuzzy weights. In: IEEE world congress on computational intelligence proceedings of the third IEEE conference on fuzzy systems, vol 1, pp 228–233

  15. Ishibuchi H, Kwon K, Tanaka H (1995) A learning algorithm of fuzzy neural networks with triangular fuzzy weights. Fuzzy Sets Syst 71:277–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishibuchi H, Morioka K, Turksen IB (1995) Learning by fuzzified neural networks. Int J Approx Reason 13:327–358

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kao CY, Hung SL (2003) Detection of structural damage via free vibration responses generated by approximating artificial neural networks. Comput Struct 81(28–29):2631–2644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khanmirza E, Khaji N, Majd VJ (2011) Model updating of multistory shear buildings for simultaneous identification of mass, stiffness and damping matrices using two different soft-computing methods. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5320–5329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leu VQ, Mwasilu F, Choi HH, Lee J, Jung JW (2013) Robust fuzzy neural network sliding mode control scheme for IPMSM drives. Int J Electron 101(7):919–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu PC (1998) The application of fuzzy neural network techniques in constructing an adaptive car-following indicator. AIEDAM 12(3):231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Masri SF, Bekey GA, Sassi H, Caughey TK (1982) Non parametric identification of a class of nonlinear multidegree dynamic systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 10(1):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Masri SF, Smyth AW, Chassiakos AG, Caughey TK, Hunter NF (2000) Application of neural networks for detection of changes in nonlinear systems. J Eng Mech 126(7):666–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Natke HG (1982) Identification of vibrating structures. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–510

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Quek ST, Wang W, Koh CG (1999) System identification of linear MDOF structures under ambient excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(1):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu ZS, Xu B, Yokoyama K (2002) Decentralized parametric damage based on neural networks. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 17(3):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu B, Wu Z, Yokoyama K (2002) A localized identification strategy with neural networks and its application to structural health monitoring. J Struct Eng 48A:419–427

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xu B, Wu Z, Chen G, Yokoyama K (2004) Direct identification of structural parameters from dynamic responses with neural networks. Eng Appl Artif Intell 17(8):931–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang JN, Lei Y, Pan S, Huang N (2003) System identification of linear structures based on Hilbert-Huang spectral analysis, part 1: normal modes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(9):1443–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu W, Li X (2004) Fuzzy identification using fuzzy neural networks with stable learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 12(3):411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yuan P, Wu Z, Ma X (1998) Estimated mass and stiffness matrices of shear building from modal test data. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 27(5):415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yun CB, Bahng EY (2000) Substructural identification using neural networks. Comput Struct 77(1):41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang H, Dai X (2012) The application of fuzzy neural network in medicine—a survey. In: International conference on biology and biomedical sciences, vol 9, pp 111–116

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi, to carry out this investigation. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions which have helped in improving the contents of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepti Moyi Sahoo.

Appendix: Fuzzy set theory and preliminaries

Appendix: Fuzzy set theory and preliminaries

The following Fuzzy arithmetic operations are used in this paper for defining fuzzified neural network.

  1. (A)

    Let X be an universal set. Then the fuzzy subset A of X is defined by its membership function

    $$\mu_{A} :\;X \to \left[ {0,1} \right]$$

    which assign a real number μ A (x) in the interval [0, 1], to each element x ∊ X, where the value of μ A (x) at x shows the grade of membership of x in A.

  2. (B)

    Given a fuzzy set A in X and any real number α ∊ [0, 1], then the α- cut or α-level or cut worthy set of A, denoted by A α is the crisp set

    $$A_{\alpha } = \left\{ {x \in X\left| {\mu_{A} (x) \ge \alpha } \right.} \right\}$$
  3. (C)

    A triangular fuzzy number (TFN) A can be defined as a triplet \(\left[ {\underline{a} ,ac,\bar{a}} \right]\). Its member ship function is defined as

    $$\mu_{A} (x) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {0,} \hfill & {x < \underline{a} } \hfill \\ {\frac{{x - \underline{a} }}{{ac - \bar{a}}},} \hfill & {\underline{a} \le x \le ac} \hfill \\ {\frac{{\bar{a} - x}}{{\bar{a} - ac}},} \hfill & {ac \le x \le \bar{a}} \hfill \\ {0,} \hfill & {x > \bar{a}} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right.$$

    Above TFN may be transformed to an interval form A α by α- cut as

    $$A_{\alpha } = \left[ {\underline{a}^{\left( \alpha \right)} ,\bar{a}^{(\alpha )} } \right] = \left[ {(ac - \underline{a} )\alpha + \underline{a} , - (\bar{a} - ac)\alpha + \bar{a}} \right]$$

    where a (α) and \(\overline{a}^{\left( \alpha \right)}\) are the lower and upper limits of the α-level set A α .

1.1 Operation of fuzzy numbers

We introduce arithmetic operations on fuzzy numbers and the results are expressed in terms of membership functions ∀xyz ∊ R as below

  1. 1.

    Addition: \(\mu_{A( + )B} (z) = \hbox{max} \{ \mu_{A} (x) \wedge \mu_{B} (y)|z = x + y\} .\)

  2. 2.

    Multiplication: \(\mu_{A( \cdot )B} (z) = \hbox{max} \{ \mu_{A} (x) \wedge \mu_{B} (y)|z = x \cdot y\} .\)

  3. 3.

    Nonlinear mapping: \(\mu_{f(Net)} (z) = \hbox{max} \left\{ {\mu_{Net} (x)|z = f(x)} \right\} .\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakraverty, S., Sahoo, D.M. Fuzzy neural network-based system identification of multi-storey shear buildings. Neural Comput & Applic 28, 597–612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2101-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2101-y

Keywords

Navigation