Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Load frequency controller design of a two-area system composing of PV grid and thermal generator via firefly algorithm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, firefly algorithm (FA) for optimal tuning of PI controllers for load frequency control of hybrid system composing of photovoltaic (PV) system and thermal generator is introduced. Also, maximum power point tracking of PV is considered in the design process. The block diagram of the hybrid system is performed. To robustly tune the parameters of controllers, a time-domain-based objective function is established which is solved by the FA. Simulation results are presented to show the improved performance of the suggested FA-based controllers compared with genetic algorithm (GA). These results show that the proposed controllers present better performance over GA in terms of settling times and different indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elgerd OI (2006) Electric energy systems theory. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bevrani H (2014) Robust power system frequency control, Switzerland, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Y, Zhou R, Wen C (1993) Robust load-frequency controller design for power systems. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 140(1):11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Azzam M (1999) Robust automatic generation control. Energy Convers Manag 40:1413–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee HJ, Park JB, Joo YH (2006) Robust load-frequency control for uncertain nonlinear power systems: a fuzzy logic approach. Int J Inf Sci 176(23):3520–3537

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan W, Xu Z (2009) Robust analysis and design of load frequency controller for power systems. Electr Power Syst Res 79(5):846–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan W, Zhou H (2012) Robust analysis of decentralized load frequency control for multi-area power systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 43(1):996–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chidambaram IA, Paramasivam B (2009) Genetic algorithm based decentralized controller for load-frequency control of interconnected power systems with RFB considering TCPS in the tie-line. Int J Electron Eng Res 1(4):299–312

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sakhavati A, Gharehpetian GB, Hosseini SH (2011) Decentralized robust load-frequency control of power system based on quantitative feedback theory. Turk J Electr Eng Comp Sci 19(4):513–530

    Google Scholar 

  10. Selvakumaran S, Parthasarathy S, Karthigaivel R, Rajasekaran V (2012) Optimal decentralized load frequency control in a parallel AC–DC interconnected power system through HVDC link using PSO algorithm. Energy Proc 14:1849–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singla H, Kumar A (2012) LQR based load frequency control with SMES in deregulated environment. In: Annual IEEE India conference (INDICON), 7–9 Dec 2012, Kochi, pp 286–292

  12. Pandey SK, Mohanty SR, Kishor N, Catalão JPS (2013) An advanced LMI-based-LQR design for load frequency control of an autonomous hybrid generation system. Technol Innov Internet Things IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol 394:371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liaw CM (1991) A modified optimal load-frequency controller for interconnected power systems. Optim Control Appl Methods 12(3):197–204

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasan N (2012) Design and analysis of pole-placement controller for interconnected power systems. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2(8):212–217

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bengiamin NN, Chan WC (1982) Variable structure control of electric power generation. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst PAS-101:376–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Umrao R, Chaturvedi DK, Malik OP (2011) Load frequency control: a polar fuzzy approach. Swarm Evolut Memet Comput Lect Notes Comput Sci 7076:494–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bevrani H, Daneshmand PR (2012) Fuzzy logic-based load-frequency control concerning high penetration of wind turbines. IEEE Syst J 6(1):173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Umrao R, Chaturvedi DK (2013) A novel fuzzy control approach for load frequency control. Recent Adv Syst Model Appl Lect Notes Electr Eng 188:239–247

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zamee MA, Mitra D, Tahhan SY (2013) Load frequency control of interconnected hydro-thermal power system using conventional PI and fuzzy logic controller. Int J Energy Power Eng 2(5):191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yousef HA, AL-Kharusi K, Albadi MH, Hosseinzadeh N (2014) Load frequency control of a multi-area power system: an adaptive fuzzy logic approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(4):1822–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prakash S, Sinha S (2011) Load frequency control of three area interconnected hydro-thermal reheat power system using artificial intelligence and PI controllers. Int J Eng Sci Technol 4(1):23–37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nag S, Philip N (2013) Application of neural networks to automatic load frequency control. Swarm Evolut Memet Comput Lect Notes Comput Sci 8298:431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Francis R, Chidambaram IA (2013) Application of modified dynamic neural network for the load frequency control of a two area thermal reheat power system. Int Rev Autom Control 6(1):47–53

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ramesh S, Krishnan A (2009) Modified genetic algorithm based load frequency controller for interconnected power systems. Int J Electr Power Eng 3(1):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  25. Milani AE, Mozafari B (2011) Genetic algorithm based optimal load frequency control in two area interconnected power system. Glob J Technol Optim 2:6–10

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jeyalakshmi V, Subburaj P (2015) Load frequency control in two area multi units interconnected power system using multi objective genetic algorithm. WSEAS Trans Power Syst 10:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ghoshal SP (2004) Optimizations of PID gains by particle swarm optimizations in fuzzy based automatic generation control. Int J Electr Power Syst Res 72(3):203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hooshmand R, Ataei M, Zargari A (2012) A new fuzzy sliding mode controller for load frequency control of large hydropower plant using particle swarm optimization algorithm and Kalman estimator. Eur Trans Electr Power 22(6):812–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. GiriBabu V, Hemanth B, Kumar TS, Prasanth BV (2014) Single area load frequency control problem using particle swarm optimization. Int J Eng Sci 3(6):46–52

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jagatheesan K, Anandand B, Ebrahim MA (2014) Stochastic particle swarm optimization for tuning of PID controller in load frequency control of single area reheat thermal power system. Int J Electr Power Eng 8(2):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ali ES, Abd-Elazim SM (2011) Bacteria foraging optimization algorithm based load frequency controller for interconnected power system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(3):633–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ali ES, Abd-Elazim SM (2013) BFOA based design of PID controller for two area load frequency control with nonlinearities. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 51:224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Saikia LC, Sahu SK (2013) Automatic generation control of a combined cycle gas turbine plant with classical controllers using firefly algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 53:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Padhan S, Sahu RK, Panda S (2014) Application of firefly algorithm for load frequency control of multi-area interconnected power system. Electr Power Compon Syst 42(13):1419–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sahu RK, Panda S, Padhan S (2015) A novel hybrid gravitational search and pattern search algorithm for load frequency control of nonlinear power system. Appl Soft Comput 29:310–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abd-Elaziz AY, Ali ES (2015) Cuckoo search algorithm based load frequency controller design for nonlinear interconnected power system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 73C:632–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Abd-Elazim SM, Ali ES (2016) Load frequency controller design via BAT algorithm for nonlinear interconnected power system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 77C:166–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang XS (2010) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms, 2nd edn. Luniver Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yang XS (2010) Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimization. Int J Bio-Inspir Comput 2(2):78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang XS (2010) Firefly algorithm, levy flights and global optimization. In: Research and development in intelligent systems XXVI, Springer, London, pp 209–218

  41. Hashmi A, Goel N, Goel S, Gupta D (2013) Firefly algorithm for unconstrained optimization. IOSR J Comput Eng 11(1):75–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mahapatra S, Panda S, Swain SC (2014) A hybrid firefly algorithm and pattern search technique for SSSC based power oscillation damping controller design. Ain Shams Eng J. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2014.07.002

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ndongmo J, Kenné G, Fochie R, Cheukem A, Fotsin H, Lagarrigue F (2014) A simplified nonlinear controller for transient stability enhancement of multimachine power systems using SSSC device. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 54:650–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rajalakshmi N, Subramanian DP, Thamizhavel K (2015) Performance enhancement of radial distributed system with distributed reconfiguration using binary firefly algorithm. J Inst Eng Ser B 96(1):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang XS, Hosseini SSS, Gandomi AH (2012) Firefly algorithm for solving non-convex economic dispatch problems with valve loading effect. Appl Soft Comput 12:1180–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chandrasekaran K, Simon SP, Padhy NP (2013) Binary real coded firefly algorithm for solving unit commitment problem. Inf Sci 249:67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Santy T, Natesan R (2015) Load frequency control of a two area system consisting of a grid connected PV system and diesel generator. Int J Emerg Technol Comput Electron 13(1):456–461

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tomy FT, Prakash R (2014) Load frequency control of a two area hybrid system consisting of a grid connected PV system and thermal generator. Int J Res Eng Technol 3(7):573–580

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ali ES (2015) Speed control of DC series motor supplied by photovoltaic system via firefly algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 26(6):1321–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Oshaba AS, Ali ES, Abd-Elazim SM (2015) PI controller design for MPPT of photovoltaic system supplied SRM via BAT search algorithm. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-2091-9

    Google Scholar 

  51. Oshaba AS, Ali ES, Abd-Elazim SM (2015) PI controller design using ABC algorithm for MPPT of PV system supplying DC motor pump load. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-2067-9

    Google Scholar 

  52. Oshaba AS, Ali ES, Abd-Elazim SM (2015) Speed control of SRM supplied by photovoltaic system via ant colony optimization algorithm. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-2068-8

    Google Scholar 

  53. Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. A Bradford Book; Reprint edition

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. S. Ali.

Appendix

Appendix

The system data are as shown below:

  1. (a)

    The parameters of the thermal system: \( T_{\text{P}} \) = 20 s; \( T_{\text{t}} \) = 0.3 s; \( T_{\text{r}} \) =10 s; \( T_{12} \) = 0.545 p.u; \( T_{\text{g}} \) = 0.08 s; \( K_{\text{P}} \) = 120 Hz/p.u MW; B = 0.8 p.u MW/Hz; \( a_{12} \) = −1; \( R \) = 0.4 Hz/p.u MW; \( K_{r1} \) = 0.33p.u MW.

  2. (b)

    The parameters of FA: the contrast of the attractiveness = 1.0; the attractiveness = 0.1 at \( r = 0 \); randomization parameter \( (\alpha ) \) = 0.1; maximum number of generations = 100; number of fireflies = 50.

  3. (c)

    The parameters of GA are as follows: max generation = 100; population size = 50; crossover probabilities = 0.75; mutation probabilities = 0.1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abd-Elazim, S.M., Ali, E.S. Load frequency controller design of a two-area system composing of PV grid and thermal generator via firefly algorithm. Neural Comput & Applic 30, 607–616 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2668-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2668-y

Keywords

Navigation