Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-item transportation problem with mode of transportation preference by MCDM method in interval type-2 fuzzy environment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we employ all the parameters as trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy numbers to cope with ambiguity and vagueness problem. There are two issues being addressed in this paper. The first is the selection of the most convenient transportation mode. We present a method for solving multi-criteria decision-making problem to deal with evaluating and ranking alternatives from the best to the worst with respect to decision maker(s) preferences. This is applied to find the most preferred transportation mode among available modes concerning some evaluation criteria for a transportation problem. A possibility degree is used for comparisons between the overall values of alternatives to raise a possibility degree matrix. Based on that matrix, the alternatives are ranked according to the ranking vector derived from the matrix, and the best one is selected. The second is to construct a multi-item transportation problem using that preferred mode of transportation. To get the crisp model, a defuzzification approach is adopted. To convert multi-objective transportation problem into a single-objective problem, two different techniques (i) fuzzy goal programming method and (ii) convex combination method are used. Then the reduced single-objective problem is solved by generalized reduced gradient method (LINGO-14.0) and a set of optimal solutions are obtained and presented graphically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haley K (1962) The solid transportation problem. Oper Res 10:448–463

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu J, Zhang Y, Chen X, Liu Y (2013) Multi-criteria decision making method based on possibility degree of interval type-2 fuzzy number. Knowl Based Syst 43:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ojha A, Das B, Mondal S, Maiti M (2010) A solid transportation problem for an item with fixed charge, vechicle cost and price discounted varying charge using genetic algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 10:100–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahraman C, Öztaysi B, Sari IU, Turanoglu E (2014) Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowl Based Syst 59:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu J, Zhou X (2009) Fuzzy link multiple-objective decision making. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:199–249

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Pramanik S, Jana DK, Maiti M (2013) Multi-objective solid transportation problem in imprecise environments. J Transp Secur 6(2):131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pramanik S, Jana DK, Maiti K (2014) A multi objective solid transportation problem in fuzzy, bi-fuzzy environment via genetic algorithm. Int. J. Adv Oper Manag 6:4–26

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pramanik S, Jana DK, Maiti M (2015) A fixed charge multi-objective solid transportation problem in random fuzzy environment. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28(6):2643–2654

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pramanik S, Jana DK, Mondal SK, Maiti M (2015) A fixed-charge transportation problem in two-stage supply chain network in Gaussian type-2 fuzzy environments. Inf Sci 325:190–214

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang L, Liu P, Li S, Gao Y, Ralescu DA (2015) Reduction methods of type-2 uncertain variables and their applications to solid transportation problem. Inf Sci 291:204–237

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakawa M (1984) Interactive fuzzy goal programming for multiobjective nonlinear programming problems and its applications to water quality management. Control Cybern 13:217–228

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanino T, Tanaka T, Inuiguchi M (2003) Multi-objective programming and goal programming: theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jana DK, Pramanik S, Maiti M (2016) A parametric programming method on gaussian type-2 fuzzy set and its application to a multilevel supply chain. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 2(3):451–477

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Tai K, El-Sayed AR, Biglarbegian M, Gonzlez CI, Castillo O, Mahmud S (2016) Review of recent type-2 fuzzy controller applications. Algorithms 9(2):39

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzlez CI, Melin P, Castro JR, Castillo O, Mendoza O (2016) Optimization of interval type-2 fuzzy systems for image edge detection. Appl Soft Comput 47:631–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Castillo O, Cervantes L, Soria J, Sanchez MA, Castro JR (2016) A generalized type-2 fuzzy granular approach with applications to aerospace. Inf Sci 354:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Castillo O, Amador-Angulo L, Castro JR, Valdez MG (2016) A comparative study of type-1 fuzzy logic systems, interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems and generalized type-2 fuzzy logic systems in control problems. Inf Sci 354:257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Amador-Angulo L, Mendoza O, Castro JR, Daz AR, Melin P, Castillo O (2016) Fuzzy sets in dynamic adaptation of parameters of a bee colony optimization for controlling the trajectory of an autonomous mobile robot. Sensors 16(9):14–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jana DK, Pramanik S, Maiti M (2016) Mean and CV reduction methods on Gaussian type-2 fuzzy set and its application to a multilevel profit transportation problem in a two-stage supply chain network. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2202-2

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gitinavard H, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B (2016) A new multi-criteria weighting and ranking model for group decision-making analysis based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets to selection problems. Neural Comput Appl 27(6):1593–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Das P (2010) In search of best alternatives: a TOPSIS driven MCDM procedure for neural network modeling. Neural Comput Appl 9(1):91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen TY (2016) A likelihood-based assignment method for multiple criteria decision analysis with interval type-2 fuzzy information. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2288-6

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Z (2016) Trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2488-0

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chen SM, Lee LW (2010) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 37:824–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang L, Chu J, Wu J (2007) Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 107(1):151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruiz-Padillo A, Torija AJ, Ramos-Ridao AF, Ruiz DP (2016) Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision in noise action plans: prioritizing road stretches. Environ Modell Softw 81(c):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tadic S, Zecevic S, Krstic M (2014) Novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection. Expert Syst Appl 41:8112–8128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tuzkaya UR, Önüt S (2008) A fuzzy analytical network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: a case study. Inf Sci 178:3133–3146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen SM, Lee LW (2010) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 37:2790–2798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee HS (2005) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for the selection of the distribution center. Lect Notes Comput Sci (LNCS) 3612:1290–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rubio JJ, Ochoa G, Meda JA, Rangel VI, Pacheco J (2015) Acquisition system and analytic fuzzy model of a manufactured wind turbine. IEEE Lat Am Trans 13(12):3879–3884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubio JJ, Ortigoza RS, Avila FJ, Melendez A, Stein JM (2015) A fuzzy inference system for the identification. IEEE Lat Am Trans 13(9):2823–2829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rubio JJ, Bouchachia A (2016) MSAFIS: an evolving fuzzy inference system. Soft Comput. doi:10.1007/s00500-015-1946-4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipak Kumar Jana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest for the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samanta, S., Jana, D.K. A multi-item transportation problem with mode of transportation preference by MCDM method in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 605–617 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3093-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3093-6

Keywords

Navigation