Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Artificial neural network based screening of cervical cancer using a hierarchical modular neural network architecture (HMNNA) and novel benchmark uterine cervix cancer database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work reported in this paper presents a novel hierarchical modular neural network architecture (HMNNA) for automated screening of cervical cancer. HMNNA consists of three neural networks trained specifically on different areas of problem space under consideration, and the trained networks are then arranged in a tree structure forming hierarchical modular neural network architecture. The three specialized neural networks are trained by Levenberg–Maarquardt neural network algorithm. As compared to the standard back propagation algorithm, Levenberg–Maarquardt is fast and stable for convergence with only one drawback, i.e., storage requirement for estimated Hessian Matrix. For training and testing of HMNNA, a huge primary database is created which contains 8091 cervical cell images pertaining to 200 clinical cases collected from two health care institutions of northern India. The raw cases of cervical cancer in the form of Pap smear slides were photographed under a multi-headed digital microscope. Individual cells were manually cropped off from these slide images which were then passed through a feature extraction module for morphological profiling. Each cell was calibrated on the basis of 40 features from both cytoplasm and nucleus. After profiling, these cells were vigilantly assigned cell classes as per the latest 2001-Bethesda system of cervical cancer cell classification, by trained cytotechnicians and histopathologists. HMNNA is also trained and tested on the Herlev Benchmark dataset created by the Denmark University, which consists of 1417 cervical cancer cells. Both the datasets have seven classes of diagnosis, i.e., superficial squamous, intermediate squamous, columnar, mild dysplasia, moderate dysplasia, severe dysplasia, and carcinoma in situ, corresponding to the level of abnormality in cervical cells. These datasets are available in public domain at http://digitalpapsmeardb.in/ and http://mde-lab.aegean.gr/index.php/downloads. The screening potential of the HMNNA is compared with 25 well-known machine learning algorithms available in MatlabR2016 (Machine learning and statistics toolbox 10.2) and monolithic neural network algorithms available in Matlab neural network pattern recognition toolbox. The HMNNA outperformed in all the 25 algorithms for both the datasets. For the Novel Benchmark database, it produced a classification accuracy of 95.32% with an F-value of 0.949310 and classification accuracy of 88.41% with an F-value of 0.89145 for the Herlev dataset. The screening potential of HMNNA was also evaluated and compared with the other diagnostic systems available in the recently published literature and was found to be performing much better than the counterparts on multiple parameters of performance evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS (2001) Cancer burden in the year 2000: the global picture. Eur J Cancer 37:S4–S66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldie SJ, Kuhn L, Denny L, Pollack A, Wright T (2001) Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource setting: clinical benefits and cost effectiveness. J Am Med Assoc 285:3107–3115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarwar A, Sharma V, Gupta R (2015) Hybrid ensemble learning technique for screening of cervical cancer using Papanicolaou smear image analysis. Pers Med Universe 4:54–62. doi:10.1016/j.pmu.2014.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarwar A, Suri J, Ali M, Sharma V (2016) Novel benchmark database of digitized and calibrated cervical cells for artificial intelligence based screening of cervical cancer. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. doi:10.1007/s12652-016-0353-8

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castellsagué X, de Sanjosé S, Aguado T, Louie KS, Bruni L, Muñoz J, Diaz M, Irwin K, Gacic M, Beauvais O, Albero G, Ferrer E, Byrne S, Bosch FX (2007) HPV and cervical cancer in the World 2007 Report. Vaccine, Elsevier

  6. Chaturvedi A, Gillison ML (2010) Human papillomavirus and head and neck cancer. In: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention of head and neck cancer, pp 87–116

  7. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Herrero R, Castellsague X, Shah KV et al (2003) Epidemiologic classification of human Papillomavirus types associated with cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med 348:518–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cronjé HS (2005) Screening for cervical cancer in the developing world. Best Pract Res: Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19(4):517–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Delgado G, Bundy B, Zaino R, Sevin BU, Creasman WT, Major F (1990) Prospective surgical—pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage Ib squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 38:352–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frankel K, Sidawy MK (1994) Formal proposal to combine the papanicolaou numerical system with Bethesda terminology for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses. Diagn Cytopathol 10(4):395–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. The discipline of machine learning: Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Machine Learning Department (2006)

  13. Witten IH, Frank E (2005) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Tan P-N (2006) Introduction to data mining. Pearson Education, India

    Google Scholar 

  15. Niknejad A, Petrovic D (2013) Introduction to computational intelligence techniques and areas of their applications in medicine. In: Agah A (ed) Medical applications of artificial intelligence. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 51–70

  16. Ayer T, Alagoz O, Chhatwal J, Shavlik JW, Kahn CE, Burnside ES (2010) Breast cancer risk estimation with artificial neural networks revisited. Cancer 116:3310–3321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baxt WG (1995) Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet 346:1135–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lundin J (1998) Artificial neural networks in outcome prediction. Anns Chir Gynaecol 87:128–130

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murre JMJ (1992) Learning and categorization in modular neural networks. Harvester – Wheatcheaf

  20. Jacobs R. Task decomposition through competition in modular neural network architecture Ph.D. thesis

  21. Johannes S, Wieringa BM, Matzke M, Münte TF (1996) Hierarchical visual stimuli: electrophysiological evidence for separate left hemispheric global and local processing mechanisms in humans. Neurosci Lett 210(2):111–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alpaydin E (1993) Multiple networks for function learning. In: International conference on neural networks, vol. 1, CA, USA, pp 9–14

  23. Waibel A (1989) Modular construction of time-delay neural networks for speech recognition. Neural Comput 1:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Manju T, Priya K, Chitra R (2013) Heart disease prediction system using weight optimized neural network. Int J Comput Sci Manag Res 2:2391–2397. (ISSN:2278-733X)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ayer T, Alagoz O, Chhatwal J, Shavlik JW, Kahn CE, Burnside ES (2010) Breast cancer risk estimation with artificial neural networks revisited: discrimination and calibration. Cancer 116:3310–3321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kourou K, Exarchos TP, Exarchos KP, Karamouzis MV, Fotiadis DI (2015) Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 13:8–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tseng C-J, Lu C-J, Chang C-C, Chen G-D (2014) Application of machine learning to predict the recurrence-proneness for cervical cancer. Neural Comput Appl 24(6):1311–1316. doi:10.1007/s00521-013-1359-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mat-Isa NA, Mashor MY, Othman NH (2008) An automated cervical pre-cancerous diagnostic system. Artif Intell Med 42(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Übeyli ED (2005) A mixture of experts network structure for breast cancer diagnosis. J Med Syst. doi:10.1007/s10916-005-6112-6

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ashidi N, Isa M, Mashor MY, Othman NH (2003) Classification of abnormal cervical cells using hierarchical multilayered perceptron network. In: CDROM proceedings of world congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering (WC2003). Paper no. 103, vol 4. Sydney, Australia

  31. Sokouti B, Haghipour S, Tabrizi AD (2014) A framework for diagnosing cervical cancer disease based on feedforward MLP neural network and ThinPrep histopathological cell image features. Neural Comput Appl 24:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kusy M, Obrzut B, Kluska J (2013) Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. Med Biol Eng Comput 51(12):1357–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mariarputham EJ, Stephen A (2015) Nominated texture based cervical cancer classification. In: Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, vol 2015, Article ID 586928, p 10

  34. Sulaiman SN, Mat-Isa NA, Othman NH, Ahmad F (2015) Improvement of features extraction process and classification of cervical cancer for the NeuralPap system. In: 19th International conference on knowledge based and intelligent information and engineering systems, Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier vol 60, pp 750–759

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and IT, University of Jammu, Jammu, J&K, India

    Mehbob Ali, Abid Sarwar & Vinod Sharma

  2. Department of Pathology, Government Medical College Jammu, Jammu, J&K, India

    Jyotsna Suri

Authors
  1. Mehbob Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abid Sarwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinod Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jyotsna Suri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehbob Ali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This study bears no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M., Sarwar, A., Sharma, V. et al. Artificial neural network based screening of cervical cancer using a hierarchical modular neural network architecture (HMNNA) and novel benchmark uterine cervix cancer database. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 2979–2993 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3246-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3246-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation