Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Seismic performance evaluation of existing RC structures based on hybrid sensing method

  • S.I.: Emergence in Human-like Intelligence towards Cyber-Physical Systems
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The properties of structures such as stiffness and damping ratio are not a constant but varying in time due to material deterioration such as strength degradation, corrosion, crack and fatigue. The seismic performance of an existing structure is generally evaluated based on design drawings and visual inspection data without consideration of the effects of material deterioration. This paper introduces the process of material deterioration of existing reinforced concrete structures and evaluates its effects on their seismic performance by proposing the three-dimensional fragility curve based on hybrid sensing method. The curve shows the probability of failure of structures with respect to load and time. A bridge under the marine environment in service is utilized to demonstrate the changes of seismic performance because of chloride-induced corrosion of steel bars, which is the main cause of deterioration of existing reinforced concrete near-shore structures. The engineers can make their decisions more wisely for design and maintenance of RC structures based on the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frangopol DM, Lin KY, Estes A (1997) Reliability of reinforced concrete girders under corrosion attack. J Struct Eng 123(3):286–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maage M, Helland S, Poulsen E, Vennesland O, Carlsen JE (1996) Service life prediction of existing concrete structures exposed to marine environment. ACI Mater J 93(6):602–608

    Google Scholar 

  3. Engelund S, Sorensen JD, Sorensen B (1999) Evaluation of repair and maintenance strategies for concrete coastal bridges on a probabilistic basis. ACI Mater J 96(2):160–166

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yoon S, Wang K, Weiss WJ, Shah SP (2000) Interaction between loading, corrosion, and serviceability of reinforced concrete. ACI Mater J 97(6):637–644

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vu KAT, Stewart MG (2000) Structural reliability of concrete bridges including improved chloride-induced corrosion models. Struct Saf 22(4):313–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Val D (2007) Deterioration of strength of RC beams due to corrosion and its influence on beam reliability. J Struct Eng 133(9):1297–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burgazzi L (2008) About time-variant reliability analysis with reference to passive systems assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:1682–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuniewski SP, van der Weide JA, van Noortwijk JM (2009) Sampling inspection for the evaluation of time-dependent reliability of deteriorating systems under imperfect defect detection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:1480–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yi J-H, Kim D, Feng MQ (2009) Periodic seismic performance evaluation of highway bridges using structural health monitoring system. Struct Eng Mech 31(5):527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang HH, Huo J-R (1994) Generation of hazard-consistent fragility curves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 13:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singhal A, Kiremidjian AS (1996) Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. J Struct Eng 122(12):1459–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seidel MJ, Reinhorn AM, Park YJ (1989) Seismic damageability assessment of R/C buildings in eastern U.S. J Struct Eng 115(9):2184–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Soumya A, Pandey AD, Das R et al (2016) Effect of material deterioration and increasing seismic activity on failure patterns of a composite dam. J Civ Struct Health Monit 6(2):189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bastidas-Arteaga E, Bressolette P, Chateauneuf A et al (2009) Probabilistic lifetime assessment of RC structures under coupled corrosion–fatigue deterioration processes. Struct Saf 31(1):84–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pang YT (2013) Stochastic fragility analysis of bridges considering the material deterioration. J Tongji Univ (Nat Sci) 41(3):348–354

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tuutti K (1982) Corrosion of steel in concrete. Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vu KAT, Stewart MG (2005) Predicting the likelihood and extent of RC corrosion-induced cracking. J Struct Eng 131(11):1681–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart MG, Al-Harthy A (2008) Pitting corrosion and structural reliability of corroding RC structures: experimental data and probabilistic analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(3):373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonzales JA, Andrade C, Alonso C, Feliu S (1995) Comparison of rates of general corrosion and maximum pitting penetration on concrete embedded steel reinforcement. Cem Concr Res 25(2):257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Val D, Melchers R (1997) Reliability of deteriorating RC slab bridges. J Struct Eng 123(12):1638–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Y, Weyers RE (1998) Modeling the time-to-corrosion cracking in chloride contaminated reinforced concrete structures. ACI Mater J 95(6):675–681

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vu K, Stewart MG, Mullard J (2005) Corrosion-induced cracking: experimental data and predictive models. ACI Struct J 102(5):719–726

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cairns J, Plizzari G, Du Y, Law D, Franzoni C (2005) Mechanical properties of corrosion-damaged reinforcement. ACI Mater J 102(4):256–264

    Google Scholar 

  24. OpenSees (2006) Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  25. FEMA 356 (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  26. FEMA 440 (2005) Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Applied Technology Council (ATC-55 Project)

  27. Fortran (1995) Fortran 90 user’s guide. Sun Microsystems, Santa Clara

    Google Scholar 

  28. HAZUS99 (1999) User’s manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos. 11402166 and 51408400), the General Projects in Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (Grant No. 13JCYBJC39100), the Youth Projects in Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (Grant No. 12JCQNJC05000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jintao Cui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, J., Xie, H., Cui, P. et al. Seismic performance evaluation of existing RC structures based on hybrid sensing method. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 4653–4663 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3448-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3448-7

Keywords

Navigation