Abstract
Driving intention has been widely used in intelligent driver assistance systems, automated driving systems, and electric vehicle control strategies. The accuracy, practicality, and timeliness of the driving intention identification model are its key issues. In this paper, a novel driver’s braking intention identification model based on the Gaussian mixture-hidden Markov model (GHMM) and generalized growing and pruning radial basis function neural network (GGAP-RBFNN) is proposed to improve the identification accuracy of the model. The simplest brake pedal and vehicle speed data that are easily obtained from the vehicle are used as an observation sequence to improve practicality of the model. The data of the pressing brake pedal stage are used to identify the braking intention to improve the timeliness of the model. The experimental data collected from real vehicle tests are used for off-line training and online identification. The research results show that the accuracy of driver’s braking intention identification model based on the GHMM/GGAP-RBFNN hybrid model is 94.69% for normal braking and 95.57% for slight braking, which are, respectively, 26.55% and 17.72% higher than achieved by the GHMM. In addition, the data of the pressing brake pedal stage are used for intention identification, which is 1.2 s faster than that of the existing identification model based on the GHMM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Li Y, Xing L, Wang W et al (2017) Evaluating impacts of different longitudinal driver assistance systems on reducing multi-vehicle rear-end crashes during small-scale inclement weather. Accid Anal Prev 107:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.014
Koglbauer I, Holzinger J, Eichberger A et al (2017) Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers’ perceived safety and trust. Traffic Injury Prev 19(3):332–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1407411
Wismans J, Skogsmo I, Nilssonehle A et al (2016) Commentary: status of road safety in Asia. J Crash Prev Inj Control 17(3):217–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2015.1066498
Bärgman J, Boda CN, Dozza M (2017) Counterfactual simulations applied to SHRP2 crashes: the effect of driver behavior models on safety benefit estimations of intelligent safety systems. Accid Anal Prev 102:165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.003
Cicchino JB (2016) Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. Accid Anal Prev 99:142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009
Bastien C, Neal-Sturgess C, Blundell MV (2013) Influence of vehicle secondary impact following an emergency braking on an unbelted occupant’s neck, head and thorax injuries. Int J Crashworthiness 18(3):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2013.775094
Kaempchen N, Schiele B, Dietmayer K (2009) Situation assessment of an autonomous emergency brake for arbitrary vehicle-to-vehicle collision scenarios. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 10(4):678–687. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2009.2026452
Hua Y, Jiang H, Tian H et al (2017) A comparative study of clustering analysis method for driver’s steering intention classification and identification under different typical conditions. Appl Sci 7(10):1014–1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7101014
Nie Y, Liu Y, Cheng S et al (2017) Unified brake service by a hierarchical controller for active deceleration control in an electric and automated vehicle. Energies 10(12):2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122052
Lee HK, Shin SG, Kwon DS (2017) Design of emergency braking algorithm for pedestrian protection based on multi-sensor fusion. Int J Automot Technol 18(6):1067–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-017-0104-7
Fildes B, Keall M, Bos N et al (2015) Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes. Accid Anal Prev 81:24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.029
Rosén E, Källhammer JE, Eriksson D et al (2010) Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. Accid Anal Prev 42(6):1949–1957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.018
Kusano KD, Gabler HC (2012) Safety benefits of forward collision warning, brake assist, and autonomous braking systems in rear-end collisions. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 13(4):1546–1555. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2012.2191542
Kim IH, Bong JH, Park J et al (2017) Prediction of driver’s intention of lane change by augmenting sensor information using machine learning techniques. Sensors 17(6):1350–1367. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061350
Kidd DG, Cicchino JB, Reagan IJ et al (2017) Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles. Traffic Injury Prev 18(sup1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1297532
Imamura T, Ogi T, Zhang Z, et al (2013) Study of induction and estimation method for driver’s intention by using a driving simulator. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, pp 3322–3326. https://doi.org/10.1109/smc.2013.566
Bi L, Wang C, Yang X et al (2015) Detecting driver normal and emergency lane-changing intentions with queuing network-based driver models. Int J Hum Comput Interact 31(2):139–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.986638
Pentland A, Liu A (1999) Modeling and prediction of human behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge
Li K, Wang X, Xu Y et al (2016) Lane changing intention recognition based on speech recognition models. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 69:497–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.007
Bocklisch F, Bocklisch SF, Beggiato M et al (2017) Adaptive fuzzy pattern classification for the online detection of driver lane change intention. Neurocomputing 262(11):148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.089
Peng J, Guo Y, Fu R et al (2015) Multi-parameter prediction of drivers’ lane-changing behaviour with neural network model. Appl Ergon 50:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.03.017
Amsalu SB, Homaifar A, Karimoddini A, et al (2017) Driver intention estimation via discrete hidden Markov model. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, pp 2712–2717. https://doi.org/10.1109/smc.2017.8123036
Amsalu SB, Homaifar A, Afghah F, et al (2015) Driver behavior modeling near intersections using support vector machines based on statistical feature extraction. In: IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, pp 1270–1275. https://doi.org/10.1109/ivs.2015.7225857
Rodemerk C, Winner H, Kastner R (2015) Predicting the driver’s turn intentions at urban intersections using context-based indicators. In: IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, pp 964–969. https://doi.org/10.1109/ivs.2015.7225809
Li L, Zhu Z, Wang X et al (2015) Identification of a driver’s starting intention based on an artificial neural network for vehicles equipped with an automated manual transmission. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng 230(10):1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407015611294
Kim JW, Kim IH, Lee SW (2016) Detection of braking intention during simulated driving based on EEG analysis: online study. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, pp 887–891. https://doi.org/10.1109/smc.2015.163
Kim IH, Kim JW, Haufe S et al (2015) Detection of braking intention in diverse situations during simulated driving based on EEG feature combination. J Neural Eng 12(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/016001
Haufe S, Kim JW, Kim IH et al (2014) Electrophysiology-based detection of emergency braking intention in real-world driving. J Neural Eng 11(5):056011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/11/5/056011
Wang H, Bi L, Teng T (2017) EEG-based emergency braking intention prediction for brain-controlled driving considering one electrode falling-off. In: Engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 2494–2497. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2017.8037363
Helmbrecht M, Olaverri-Monreal C, Bengler K et al (2014) How electric vehicles affect driving behavioral patterns. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag 6(3):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2014.2315758
Lee S, Choi J, Jeong K et al (2015) A study of fuel economy improvement in a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle using engine on/off and battery charging power control based on driver characteristics. Energies 8(9):10106–10126. https://doi.org/10.3390/en80910106
Langari R, Won JS (2005) Intelligent energy management agent for a parallel hybrid vehicle-part I: system architecture and design of the driving situation identification process. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 54(3):925–934. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2005.844685
Zhao X, Yu Q, Yu M, Tang Z (2018) Research on an equal power allocation electronic differential system for electric vehicle with dual-wheeled-motor front drive based on a wavelet controller. Adv Mech Eng 10(2):1–24. https://doi.org/10.11771/1687814018760039
Xiong L, Teng GW, Yu ZP et al (2016) Novel stability control strategy for distributed drive electric vehicle based on driver operation intention. Int J Automot Technol 17(4):651–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-016-0064-3
Yu Z, Zhang R, Lu X et al (2017) Robust adaptive anti-slip regulation controller for a distributed-drive electric vehicle considering the driver’s intended driving torque. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng 232(4):562–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407017703232
Li L, Wang X, Xiong R et al (2016) AMT downshifting strategy design of HEV during regenerative braking process for energy conservation. Appl Energy 183(1):914–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.031
Fang S, Song J, Song H et al (2016) Design and control of a novel two-speed uninterrupted mechanical transmission for electric vehicles. Mech Syst Signal Process 75:473–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.07.006
Ko J, Ko S, Son H et al (2015) Development of brake system and regenerative braking cooperative control algorithm for automatic-transmission-based hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 64(2):431–440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2014.2325056
Luo Y, Han Y, Chen L et al (2015) Downhill safety assistance control for hybrid electric vehicles based on the downhill driver’s intention model. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng 229(13):1848–1860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407014567908
Zhang Z, Wang L, Zhang J et al (2017) Study on requirements for load emulation of the vehicle with an electric braking system. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(11):9638–9653. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2739425
Ruan J, Walker PD, Watterson PA et al (2016) The dynamic performance and economic benefit of a blended braking system in a multi-speed battery electric vehicle. Appl Energy 183:1240–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.057
Zhao X, Xu S, Ye Y et al (2018) Composite braking AMT shift strategy for extended-range heavy commercial electric vehicle based on GHMM/ANFIS braking intention identification. Clust Comput 21(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-1888-6
Li K, Wang X, Xu Y et al (2016) Lane changing intention recognition based on speech recognition models. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 69:497–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.007
Zhang Y, Yu Z, Xu L et al (2009) A study on the strategy of braking force distribution for the hybrid braking system in electric vehicles based on braking intention. Automot Eng 31(3):244–249. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-680X.2009.03.011
Wang Y, Ning G, Yu Z (2011) Parameter selection for the identification of driver’s braking intention for passenger car. Automot Eng 33(3):213–216. https://doi.org/10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2011.03.007
Robnik-Šikonja M, Kononenko I (2003) Theoretical and empirical analysis of ReliefF and RReliefF. Mach Learn 53(1–2):23–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025667309714
Huang G, Saratchandran Sundararajan (2004) An efficient sequential learning algorithm for growing and pruning RBF (GAP-RBF) networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 34(6):2284–2292. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2004.834428
Lu Y, Sundararajan N, Sundararajan P (1998) Performance evaluation of a sequential minimal radial basis function (RBF) neural network learning algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9(2):308–318. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.661125
Park HS, Jun CH (2009) A simple and fast algorithm for K-medoids clustering. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):3336–3341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.039
Ruxton GD (2006) The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Behav Ecol 17(4):688–690. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ark016
Acknowledgements
This research is funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0803904), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51507013), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018T111006, 2017M613034), Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2017BSHEDZZ36), Shaanxi Province Industrial Innovation Chain Project (2018ZDCXL-GY-05-03-01), Shaanxi Province Key Research and Development Plan Project (2018ZDXM-GY-082), Shaanxi Innovative Talents Promotion Plan Project (2018KJXX-005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, X., Wang, S., Ma, J. et al. Identification of driver’s braking intention based on a hybrid model of GHMM and GGAP-RBFNN. Neural Comput & Applic 31 (Suppl 1), 161–174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3672-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3672-1