Skip to main content
Log in

Computer-aided autism diagnosis via second-order difference plot area applied to EEG empirical mode decomposition

  • S.I. : Computer aided Medical Diagnosis
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a name for a group of neurodevelopmental conditions that are characterized by some degree of impairment in social interaction, verbal and non-verbal communication, and difficulty in symbolic capacity and repetitive behaviors. The only protocol followed currently for ASD diagnosis is the qualitative behavioral assessment by experts through internationally established descriptive scaling standards. The assessment can, therefore, be affected by the degree of the evaluator experience as well as by the level of the descriptive standard robustness. This paper presents an EEG-based quantitative approach intended for automatic discrimination between children with typical neurodevelopment and children with ASD. The suggested work relies on second-order difference plot (SODP) area as a discriminative feature: First, every EEG channel in a 64 electrode cap—for every volunteer—is decomposed into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) by empirical mode decomposition (EMD). Next, the second-order difference plot for the first ten intrinsic mode functions—of every channel—is sketched. Third, the value of the elliptical area —for every plot—is calculated. The 95% confidence ellipse area is used as the discriminative feature. Fourth, paired t-student test is applied to the vectors consisting of discriminative feature values for counterpart channels/IMFs (e.g., channel FPz/IMF7 in autistic and neurotypical) for all volunteers. Finally, principal component analysis (PCA) and neural network (NN) are applied to the SODP area feature matrix for two-class classification (ASD and neurotypical). Moreover, the 3D mapping of EEG SODP area values was implemented and analyzed. The obtained results show that the conducted t-student tests yield values of less than 0.05, and that the NN two-class classification based on SODP features leads to a 94.4% accuracy, which indicates significant differences between SODP area values of children with neurotypical development and those diagnosed with ASD. The obtained results have also been emphasized by the analysis of the findings of the performed 3D mapping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdulhay E, Alafeef M, Abdelhay A, Al-Bashir A (2018) Correction to: classification of normal, ictal and inter-ictal EEG via direct quadrature and random forest tree. J Med Biol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-017-0363-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdulhay E, Baconnier P (2007) Stroke volume estimation by thoracocardiography is better when glottis is closed. In: 2007 29th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2007.4352481

  3. Abdulhay E, Mohammed MA, Ibrahim DA, Arunkumar N, Venkatraman V (2018) Computer aided solution for automatic segmenting and measurements of blood leucocytes using static microscope images. J Med Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0912-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adeli H, Lichtenstein AG (2011) Automated EEG-based diagnosis of the neurological and psychiatric disorders. In: 2011 18th international conference on systems, signals and image processing, pp 1–4

  5. Alsaggaf EA, Kamel MI (2014) Using eegs to diagnose autism disorder by classification algorithm. Life Sci J 11(6):305–308

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barttfeld P, Wicker B, Cukier S, Navarta S, Lew S, Sigman M (2011) A big-world network in ASD: dynamical connectivity analysis reflects a deficit in long-range connections and an excess of short-range connections. Neuropsychologia 49(2):254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnette CP, Henderson HA, Inge AP, Zahka NE, Schwartz CB, Mundy PC (2010) Anterior EEG asymmetry and the modifier model of autism. J Autism Dev Disord 41(8):1113–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1138-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cavalheiro GL, Almeida M, Pereira AA, Andrade AO (2009) Study of age-related changes in postural control during quiet standing through linear discriminant analysis. Biomed Eng Online 8(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925x-8-35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheong LC, Sudirman R, Hussin SS (2015) Feature extraction of EEG signal using wavelet transform for autism classification. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia October, Faculty of Electrical Engineering

  10. Coben R, Clarke AR, Hudspeth W, Barry RJ (2008) EEG power and coherence in autistic spectrum disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 119(5):1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delechelle E, Lemoine J, Niang O (2005) Empirical mode decomposition: an analytical approach for sifting process. IEEE Signal Process Lett 12(11):764–767. https://doi.org/10.1109/lsp.2005.856878

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Djemal R, AlSharabi K, Ibrahim S, Alsuwailem A (2017) EEG-based computer aided diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder using wavelet, entropy, and ANN. Biomed Res Int 2017:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9816591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duffy FH, Als H (2012) A stable pattern of EEG spectral coherence distinguishes children with autism from neurotypical controls: a large case control study. BMC Med. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eldridge J, Lane AE, Belkin M, Dennis S (2014) Robust features for the automatic identification of autism spectrum disorder in children. J Neurodev Disord 6(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-6-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen NC, Tung CC, Liu HH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 454(1971):903–995. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Jamal W, Das S, Oprescu IA, Maharatna K, Apicella F, Sicca F (2014) Classification of autism spectrum disorder using supervised learning of brain connectivity measures extracted from synchrostates. J Neural Eng 11(4):046019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim TK (2015) T test as a parametric statistic. Korean J Anesthesiol 68(6):540. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Magiati I, Moss J, Yates R, Charman T, Howlin P (2011) Is the autism treatment evaluation checklist a useful tool for monitoring progress in children with autism spectrum disorders? J Intell Disabil Res 55(3):302–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01359.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayes SD, Calhoun SL, Murray MJ, Pearl A, Black A, Tierney CD (2014) Final DSM-5 under-identifies mild autism spectrum disorder: agreement between the DSM-5, CARS, CASD, and clinical diagnoses. Res Autism Spectr Disord 8(2):68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Murias M, Webb SJ, Greenson J, Dawson G (2007) Resting state cortical connectivity reflected in EEG coherence in individuals with autism. Biol Psychiatry 62(3):270–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oberman LM, Hubbard EM, McCleery JP, Altschuler EL, Ramachandran VS, Pineda JA (2005) EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Cognit Brain Res 24(2):190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Orekhova EV, Stroganova TA, Nygren G, Tsetlin MM, Posikera IN, Gillberg C, Elam M (2007) Excess of high frequency electroencephalogram oscillations in boys with autism. Biol Psychiatry 62(9):1022–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.12.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oweis RJ, Abdulhay EW (2011) Seizure classification in EEG signals utilizing Hilbert–Huang transform. Biomed Eng Online 10(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925x-10-38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pachori RB, Patidar S (2014) Epileptic seizure classification in eeg signals using second-order difference plot of intrinsic mode functions. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 113(2):494–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pop-Jordanova N, Zorcec T, Demerdzieva A, Gucev Z (2010) QEEG characteristics and spectrum weighted frequency for children diagnosed as autistic spectrum disorder. Nonlinear Biomed Phys 4(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-4631-4-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prieto T, Myklebust J, Hoffmann R, Lovett E, Myklebust B (1996) Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43(9):956–966. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.532130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharma R, Pachori RB (2015) Classification of epileptic seizures in EEG signals based on phase space representation of intrinsic mode functions. Expert Syst Appl 42(3):1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tejwani R, Liska A, You H, Reinen J, Das P (2017) Autism classification using brain functional connectivity dynamics and machine learning. ArXiv e-prints

  29. Wang J, Barstein J, Ethridge LE, Mosconi MW, Takarae Y, Sweeney JA (2013) Resting state EEG abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders. J Neurodev Disord 5(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-5-24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been conducted under the umbrella of the Scientific Research Support Fund (SRSF)-Funded Project # MPH/1/11/2014 - Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Victor Hugo C. de Albuquerque appreciates the received support from the Brazilian National Council for Research and Development (CNPq, Grant #304315/2017-6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enas Abdulhay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdulhay, E., Alafeef, M., Alzghoul, L. et al. Computer-aided autism diagnosis via second-order difference plot area applied to EEG empirical mode decomposition. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 10947–10956 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3738-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3738-0

Keywords

Navigation