Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Classified prediction model of rockburst using rough sets-normal cloud

  • Machine Learning - Applications & Techniques in Cyber Intelligence
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In view of complexity and uncertainty of problems in the prediction of rockburst, a classified prediction model of rockburst using rough sets-normal cloud is established. Seven main influencing factors including uniaxial compressive strength of rock σc, uniaxial tensile strength of rock σt, maximum tangential stress of surrounding rock σθ, rock integrality coefficient kv, ratio between uniaxial compressive strength of rock and uniaxial tensile strength of rock σc/σt, ratio between maximum tangential stress of surrounding rock and uniaxial compressive strength of rock σθ/σc and rock elastic deformation energy index wet are selected as the evaluation index of rockburst. Sixteen groups of rockburst examples at home and abroad are used as model construction samples. Then, the weight value of evaluation index of rockburst is obtained by rough sets and fuzzy sets. According to normal cloud theory and classification standard of rockburst, the cloud maps of evaluation index of rockburst are generated. Based on the normal cloud generator and sample data, the evaluation index of the classified sample is determined, and the comprehensive determination of evaluation index of the classified sample is obtained by combining the weight of the evaluation index of rockburst. Finally, the rockburst level is identified according to the principle of maximum membership degree. The classified prediction model of rockburst is used to predict five groups of rockburst samples at home and abroad, and the rockburst classification is coincident with the actual situation. The results show that the classified prediction model of rockburst using rough sets-normal cloud has great practicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang J, Li X, Zhou Z et al (2010) A fuzzy assessment method of rock-burst prediction based on rough set theory. Met Mine 39(6):26–29

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nanyan H, Ye Y, Yaqi L et al (2018) Improved unequal-interval grey verhulst model and its application. J Grey Syst 30(1):175–185

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou J, Li X, Shi X (2012) Long-term prediction model of rockburst in underground openings using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines. Saf Sci 50(4):629–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ye Y, Yao N, Wang Q et al (2010) A method of ranking interval numbers based on degrees for multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30(1):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adoko AC, Gokceoglu C, Wu L et al (2013) Knowledge-based and data-driven fuzzy modeling for rockburst prediction. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 61:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Qian Q (2012) Challenges faced by underground projects construction safety and countermeasures. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31(10):1945–1956

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shigen F, Zhang X, Li H (2016) Characteristics and prevention control measures of rock burst in excavation of ultra-deep shaft. J Saf Sci Technol 12(12):48–52

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao G, Liu Q, Liu C (2010) Bayes discriminant analysis for classification and prediction of rockburst intensity. Met Mine 39(5):143–147

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yang Y, Deng H, Songtao Yu (2017) Prediction of rockburst classification based on random forest. Min Metall Eng 37(4):23–27

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jianhua H, Shang J, Zhou K (2013) Improved matter-element extension model and its application to prediction of rockburst intensity. Chin J Nonferrous Met 23(2):495–502

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu C, Yi J, Jiang D et al (2007) Study on rockburst intensity prediction method based on gray relational analysis theory. China Min Mag 16(12):100–103

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wei H, Yang X, Zhou H et al (2011) Study on rock burst prediction method based on gray relational analysis theory. Yangtze River 42(9):38–42

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang G, Gao Q, Juqiang D et al (2013) Rockburst criterion based on artificial neural networks and nonlinear regression. J Cent South Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 44(7):2977–2981

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang L, Zhang D, Li S et al (2012) Application of RBF neural network to rockburst prediction based on rough set theory. Rock Soil Mech 33(Supp. 1):270–276

    Google Scholar 

  15. Min H, Chen J, Yugen L (2011) Research on rockburst prediction based on BP neural network and GA. Min Res Dev 10:90–94

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen P, Hongming Yu, Shi H (2014) Prediction model for rockburst based on weighted back analysis and standardized fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 33(10):2154–2160

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jia Y, Lv Q, Shang Y et al (2014) Rockburst prediction based on evidence theory. Chin J Geotech Eng 36(6):1079–1086

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang G, Chen C, Gao S et al (2015) Study on the height of water flowing fractured zone based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy clustering analysis method. J Min Saf Eng 32(2):206–212

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jianzhong Xie Yu, Yang QC et al (2015) Demand forecasting model for short life cycle products based on improved BASS model. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 21(1):48

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jing W, Xiaoyan W, Gao Z (2010) Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of simulation credibility based on fuzzy clustering analysis and rough sets theory. Syst Eng Electron 32(4):770–773

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang G, Liu D, Chu F et al (2015) Evaluation on risk grade of tunnel collapse based on cloud model. J Saf Sci Technol 11(6):95–101

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen Y, Liu D, Zhu D et al (2015) Comprehensive safety evaluation of ship ammunition depot based on cloud model. J Saf Sci Technol 11(2):138–144

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang B (2017) Rockburst prediction of deep buried tunnels based on projection pursuit analysis-normal cloud model. Yellow River 39(9):121–124

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen J, Meng J (2016) Normal cloud model for rockburst intensity forecast and its application. Yangtze River 47(15):82–86

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou K, Lin Y, Jianhua H et al (2016) Grading prediction of rockburst intensity based on entropy and normal cloud model. Rock Soil Mech 37(Supp. 1):596–602

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Yu, Qiang X, Chai H et al (2013) Rock burst prediction in deep shaft based on RBF-AR model. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed) 43(6):1944–1949

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Y, Shang Y, Sun H (2010) Research and application of rockburst intensity prediction model based on entropy coefficient and ideal point method. J China Coal Soc 35(2):218–221

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the study on the “Five High” Risk Identification and Control System of Enterprises (No. 149hubei-0002-2017AQ) and Hubei Province Safety Production Special Fund Project (2017HBAQZX).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430081, Hubei, China

    Ran Liu, Yicheng Ye, Nanyan Hu & Hu Chen

  2. Industrial Safety Engineering Technology Research Center of Hubei Province, Wuhan, 430081, Hubei, China

    Yicheng Ye

  3. Sinosteel Wuhan Safety and Environmental Protection Research Institute Co., Ltd., Wuhan, 430081, Hubei, China

    Xianhua Wang

Authors
  1. Ran Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yicheng Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nanyan Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xianhua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nanyan Hu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, R., Ye, Y., Hu, N. et al. Classified prediction model of rockburst using rough sets-normal cloud. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 8185–8193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3859-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3859-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation