Skip to main content
Log in

A Gaussian process machine learning model for cemented rockfill strength prediction at a diamond mine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a main strategy of backfilling in mining operations, cemented rockfill (CRF) is extensively used because of its high strength and mine waste disposal convenience. The CRF strength has a direct bearing on ground support performance in backfill mining, which necessitates investigating CRF strength determination. This study employed a Gaussian process (GP) machine learning model to reflect the relationship between CRF compressive strength and material components as well as curing age. More than one thousand data from a public database were used to train the GP model with an automatic hyperparameter optimization. A series of laboratory tests prepared eight test samples for our predicting as well as the true values for model validation. The GP model achieved a predicting accuracy with the r2 value 0.90 and the MSE value 7.78 based on CRF true values we obtained in the laboratory. In addition, seven test samples’ true values resided inside the 95% confidence interval of the GP prediction. We also constructed three other machine learning models to conduct the same work as the GP model did. The results showed that the GP model performed the best of four models, which demonstrated that the GP model was effective and robust in dealing with time series predicting task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reschke A (1993) The use of cemented rockfill at Namew Lake mine, Manitoba, Canada. In: Minefill, pp 101–108

  2. Shrestha BK, Tannant DD, Proskin S, Reinson J, Greer S (2008) Properties of cemented rockfill used in an open pit mine. In: GeoEdmonton’08. The Canadian geotechnical society edmonton, pp 609–616

  3. Mitchell R, Roettger J (1989) Analysis and modelling of sill pillars. In: Innovations in mining backfill technology Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 53–62

  4. Emad MZ (2013) Dynamic performance of cemented rockfill under blast-induced vibrations. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

  5. Emad MZ, Mitri HS, Henning JG (2012) Effect of blast vibrations on the stability of cemented rockfill. Int J Min Reclam Environ 26(3):233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM (1986) Concrete: Structure, properties and materials. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  7. Committee A Building code requirements for structural concrete: (ACI 318-99); and commentary (ACI 318R-99). In: 1999. American Concrete Institute

  8. Yeh I-C (1998) Modeling of strength of high-performance concrete using artificial neural networks. Cem Concr Res 28(12):1797–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Öztaş A, Pala M, Ea Özbay, Kanca E, Caglar N, Bhatti MA (2006) Predicting the compressive strength and slump of high strength concrete using neural network. Constr Build Mater 20(9):769–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lai S, Serra M (1997) Concrete strength prediction by means of neural network. Constr Build Mater 11(2):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Atici U (2011) Prediction of the strength of mineral admixture concrete using multivariable regression analysis and an artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):9609–9618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan K, Shi C (2010) Prediction of elastic modulus of normal and high strength concrete by support vector machine. Constr Build Mater 24(8):1479–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shahin MA, Jaksa MB, Maier HR (2001) Artificial neural network applications in geotechnical engineering. Austr Geomech 36(1):49–62

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karlin S (2014) A first course in stochastic processes. Academic Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rasmussen CE (2003) Gaussian processes in machine learning. In: Summer School on Machine Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 63–71

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xu C, Torres-Verdín C (2013) Pore system characterization and petrophysical rock classification using a bimodal Gaussian density function. Math Geosci 45(6):753–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Esfahani NM, Asghari O (2013) Fault detection in 3D by sequential Gaussian simulation of Rock Quality Designation (RQD). Arab J Geosci 6(10):3737–3747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Von Mises R (2014) Mathematical theory of probability and statistics. Academic Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ebden M (2008) Gaussian processes for regression: a quick introduction. the website of robotics research group in department on engineering science. University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. C192, C192M A (2007) Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the laboratory. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lingga BA (2018) Investigation of cemented rockfill properties used at a Canadian diamond mine. University of Alberta, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  22. C496 (2011) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) under Collaborative Research and Development (CRD) Grant, and also, supports from the Chinese Scholarship Council were gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuanyuan Pu or Derek B. Apel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pu, Y., Apel, D.B., Chen, J. et al. A Gaussian process machine learning model for cemented rockfill strength prediction at a diamond mine. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 9929–9937 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04517-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04517-x

Keywords

Navigation