Skip to main content
Log in

A verified realization of a Dempster–Shafer based fault tree analysis

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fault tree analysis is a method to determine the likelihood of a system attaining an undesirable state based on the information about its lower level parts. However, conventional approaches cannot process imprecise or incomplete data. There are a number of ways to solve this problem. In this paper, we will consider the one that is based on the Dempster–Shafer theory. The major advantage of the techniques proposed here is the use of verified methods (in particular, interval analysis) to handle Dempster–Shafer structures in an efficient and consistent way. First, we concentrate on DSI (Dempster–Shafer with intervals), a recently developed tool. It is written in MATLAB and serves as a basis for a new add-on for Dempster–Shafer based fault tree analysis. This new add-on will be described in detail in the second part of our paper. Here, we propagate experts’ statements with uncertainties through fault trees, using mixing based on arithmetic averaging. Furthermore, we introduce an implementation of the interval scale based algorithm for estimating system reliability, extended by new input distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold D (2011) Computer arithmetic tragedies. http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/455.f96/disasters.html

  2. Auer E, Luther W, Rebner G, Limbourg P (2010) A verified MATLAB toolbox for the Dempster-Shafer theory. In: Proceedings of the workshop on the theory of belief functions. http://www.udue.de/DSIPaperone, http://www.udue.de/DSI

  3. Carreras C, Walker I (2001) Interval methods for fault-tree analyses in robotics. IEEE Trans Reliab 50:3–11. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=00935010

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng Y (2000) Uncertainties in fault tree analysis. http://www2.tku.edu.tw/~tkjse/3-1/3-1-3.pdf

  5. Ferson S (2002) RAMAS Risk Calc 4.0 software: risk assessment with uncertain numbers. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferson S, Kreinovich V, Ginzburg L, Myers D, Sentz K (2003) Constructing probability boxes and Dempster–Shafer structures. SAND2002-4015. Sandia National Laboratories, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Gradstein I, Ryshik I (1981) Summen, Produkt- und Integraltafeln. Harri Deutsch, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guth M (1991) A probability foundation for vagueness and imprecision in fault tree analysis. IEEE Trans Reliab 1(40): 563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic (2008) IEEE Std 754-2008, pp 1–58. doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.2008.4610935

  10. Limbourg P (2011) Imprecise probability propagation toolbox (IPP toolbox). http://www.uni-due.de/il/ipptoolbox.php

  11. Luther W, Dyllong E, Fausten D, Otten W, Traczinski H (2001) Numerical verification and validation of kinematics and dynamical models for flexible robots in complex environments. In: Perspectives on enclosure methods. Springer, Wien, pp 181–200

  12. Martin A (2009) Implementing general belief function framework with a practical codification for low complexity. In: Smarandache F, Dezert J (eds) Advances and applications of DSmT for information fusion. Collected works, vol 3. American Research Press, Rehoboth, pp 217–273

    Google Scholar 

  13. MathWorks (2011) Parallel Computing toolbox. http://www.mathworks.de/products/parallel-computing/?s_cid=0210_webg_js_390079

  14. Moore R, Kearfott B, Cloud M (2009) Introduction to interval analysis. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rump S (1999) INTLAB–INTerval LABoratory. Dev Reliab Comput 1:77–104. http://www.ti3.tu-harburg.de/

  16. Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tonon F (2004) Using random set theory to propagate epistemic uncertainty through a mechanical system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 85(1–3): 169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Traczinski H (2006) Integration von Algorithmen und Datentypen zur validierten Mehrkörpersimulation in MOBILE. Dissertation, Universität Duisburg-Essen. Logos-Verlag, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-8325-1457-0

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabor Rebner.

Additional information

The authors have presented the results of this paper during the SCAN 2010 conference in Lyon, September 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rebner, G., Auer, E. & Luther, W. A verified realization of a Dempster–Shafer based fault tree analysis. Computing 94, 313–324 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-011-0179-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-011-0179-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation