Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation of transitional flows

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article deals with the numerical simulation of transitional flows. The aim is to evaluate two models for turbomachinery flows. The first model is a simple algebraic model developed by Straka and Příhoda and the second one is the three-equation \(k-k_L-\omega \) model of Walters and Cokljat. Both models were tested for shear flows over the flat plate (ERCOFTAC T3A, T3B, and T3A\(-\) cases) for natural and bypass transition, over two airfoils in a tandem for the transition due to incoming wake and finally for the flow through a subsonic turbine blade cascade. Both models are compared to available experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Octave is a high-level language for numerical computations similar to Matlab.

References

  1. Canepa E, Cattanei A, Pittaluga F, Ubaldi M, Zunino P (2003) Transitional boundary layer on the suction side of a turbine blade at different Reynolds numbers. In: 5th European conference on turbomachinery, Praha, pp 911–923

  2. Cho JR, Chung MK (1992) A \(k-\epsilon -\gamma \) equation turbulence model. J Fluid Mech 237:301–322

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Coirier WJ (1994) An adaptively-refined, Cartesian, cell-based scheme for the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan

  4. Coupland J (1990) Flat plate transitional boundary layers, ERCOFTAC classic database. http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uk/ercoftac

  5. Di Pasquale D, Rona A, Garrett SJ (2009) A selective review of cfd transition models. AIIA Paper (2009-3812)

  6. Durbin PA (1991) Near-wall turbulence closure modeling without ‘damping functions’. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 3:1–13

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferziger JH, Perić M (1999) Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fürst J (2008) The WLSQR scheme for the flows in complex geometry. In: Finite volumes for complex applications V. ISTE Ltd, London, pp 431–438

  9. Fürst J (2009) The high order WLSQR scheme and its applications in turbomachinery. In: Dick E, Deconinck H (eds) Computational fluid dynamics 2006. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–160

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fürst J (2012) Numerical simulation of transitional flows with laminar kinetic energy. In: 18th International conference engineering mechanics, Svratka, pp 309–315

  11. Kim KH, Kim C, Rho OH (2001) Methods for the accurate computations of hypersonic flows I. AUSMPW+ scheme. J Comput Phys 174:38–80

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kok JC (2000) Resolving the dependence on free stream values for the \(k-\omega \) turbulence model. AIAA J 38:1292–1295

    Google Scholar 

  13. Langtry RB, Menter FR (2005) Transition modeling for general CFD applications in aeronautics. AIAA Paper 2005-522

  14. Lee H, Kang S (2000) Flow characteristics of transitional boundary layers on an airfoil in wakes. J Fluids Eng 122:522–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayle RE, Schulz A (1997) The path to predicting bypass transition. J Turbomach 119:405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Medic G, Durbin PA (2002) Toward improved prediction of heat transfer on turbine blades. J Turbomach 124:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Narasimha R (1957) On the distribution of intermittency in the transition region of a boundary layer. J Aerosp Sci 24:711–712

    Google Scholar 

  18. Příhoda J, Hlava T, Kozel K (1999) Modelling of bypass transition including the pseudo-laminar part of the boundary layer. Z Angew Math Mech 79(3):S699–S700

    Google Scholar 

  19. Satta F, Simoni D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P (2007) An experimental investigation of the dissipation mechanisms in the suction side boundary layer of a turbine blade. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on experimental and computational aerothermodynamics of internal flows, Lyon

  20. Straka P, Příhoda J (2010) Application of the algebraic bypass-transition model for internal and external flows. In: Proceedings of the conference on experimental fluid mechanics (EFM10), Liberec, pp 636–641

  21. Ubaldi M, Zunino P, Campora U, Ghiglione A (1996) Detailed velocity and turbulence measurements of profile boundary layer in a large scale turbine cascade. ASME Paper 96-GT-42

  22. Walters DK, Cokljat D (2008) Three-equation eddy-viscosity model for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of transitional flow. J Fluids Eng 130:121401–121414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Walters DK, Leylek JH (2004) A new model for boundary layer transition using a single-point RANS approach. J Turbomach 126:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoder DA, Georgiadis NJ (1999) Implementation and validation of the Chien k-\(\epsilon \) turbulence model in the WIND Navier–Stokes code. AIAA Paper 99-0745

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Grants No. P101/10/1329, P101/12/1271 of the Czech Science Foundation, the project TIP FR-TI3/343 of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic, and by the institutional support RVO 61388998.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiří Fürst.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fürst, J., Příhoda, J. & Straka, P. Numerical simulation of transitional flows. Computing 95 (Suppl 1), 163–182 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-012-0266-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-012-0266-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation