Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Delta analysis with workflow logs: aligning business process prescriptions and their reality

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Requirements Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To support and drive a business process with a software system means influencing the way process participants conduct their daily work. An analysis of the relationships between organizational processes, support systems, and process participants calls for a continuous alignment and parallel evolution of the intended business process and the supporting software system. Here, the primary information needed is how process participants work with the new system and where and why they deviate from the intended process. Delta analysis with workflow logs employs workflow logs recorded during system use to compare process enactment with its prescription: log entries are related with instances of business process activities of an explicit process definition, and the timely ordering of these entries is compared with the ordering of the activities implied by the process model. If the orderings comply, the log fits the model. Log entries and activities can be on arbitrary levels of abstraction and arbitrary granularity. The results of such an analysis can be utilized as an unbiased data basis for further discussions. Moreover, compared with traditional approaches such as interviews and observations, time and costs can be saved. The paper presents the concept, a feasibility study, some aspects of the related theoretical challenges, a prototypical implementation, and initial case study results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. van der Aalst WMP, ter Hofstefe A, Weske M (2003) Business process management: a survey. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international business process management conference (BPM’2003). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 369–380

  2. Kleiner N (2004) Verbesserungsstrategien für den Workflow-Designprozess (in german). University of Ulm, Ulm

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kleiner N (2004) Supporting usage-centered workflow design: why and how? In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on business process management (BPM’04), pp 227–243

  4. Markus LM, Robey D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Manag Sci 34(5):583–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Orlikowski WJ, Robey D (1991) Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inf Syst Res 2(2):143–169

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ Sci 3(3):398–427

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burrell G, Morgan G (1979) Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernstein RJ (1978) The restructuring of social and political theory. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bernstein RJ (1983) Beyond objectivism and relativism. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giddens A (1976) New rules of sociological method. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giddens A (1979) Central problems in social theory: action structure and contradiction in social analysis. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structure. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bhaskar R (1978) A realist theory of science. Harvester Press, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bhaskar R (1983) Beef structure and place: notes from a critical naturalist perspective. J Theor Soc Behav 13:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giddens A (1982) Profiles and critiques in social theory. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Adm Sci Q 31:78–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manning PK (1982) Organizational work: structuration of environments. Br J Sociol 33(1):118–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manning PK (1989) Symbolic communication. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. McPhee RD (1985) Formal structure and organizational communication. In: McPhee RD, Tompkins PK (eds) Organization communication: traditional themes and new directions. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, pp 79–108

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pettigrew AM (1985) Contextualist research: a natural way to link theory and practice. In: Lawler EE III et al. (eds) Doing research that is useful for theory and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 222–248

    Google Scholar 

  21. Poole MS (1985) Communication and organizational climate: review critique and a new perspective. In: McPhee RD, Tompkins PK (eds) Organization communication: traditional themes and new directions. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, pp 79–108

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ranson S, Hinings B, Greenwood R (1980) The structuring of organizational structures. Adm Sci Q 25:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Riley P (1983) A structurationist account of political culture. Adm Sci Q 28:347–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roberts J, Scapens R (1985) Accounting systems and systems of accountability: understanding accounting practices in their organizational context. Account Organ Soc 10(4):443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith CW (1983) A case study of structuration: a pure-bred beef business. J Theory Soc Behav 13:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Spybey T (1984) Traditional and professional frames of meaning in management. Sociology 18(4):550–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Willmott H (1987) Studying managerial work: a critique and a proposal. J Manag Stud 24(3):249–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Attewell P, Rule J (1984) Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don’t know. Commun ACM 27:1184–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Davis LE, Taylor JC (1986) Technology organization and job structure. In: Dubin R (ed) Handbook of work organization and society. Rand McNelly, Chicago, pp 379–419

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hodson R, Parker RE (1988) Work in high-tech settings: a review of the empirical literature. Res Soc Work 4:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  31. Perrow C (1983) The organizational context of human factors engineering. Adm Sci Q 28:521–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Powell WW (1987) Review essay: explaining technological change. Am J Sociol 93(1):185–197

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Sabel CF (1982) Work and politics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci 11(4):404–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van der Aalst WMP, van Dongen BF, Herbst J, Maruster L, Schimm G, Weijters AJMM (2003) Workflow mining: a survey of issues and approaches. Data Knowl Eng 47(2):237–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jeckle M, Rupp C, Hahn J, Zengler B, Queins S (2004) UML 2 glasklar (in german). Hanser, München

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cook JE, Wulf AL (1999) Software process validation: quantitatively measuring the correspondence of a process to a model. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 8(2):147–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. van der Aalst WMP (2005) Business alignment: using process mining as a tool for delta analysis and conformance testing. Requirements Eng J 10(3) (in press)

  39. Ellis CA, Maltzahn C (1997) The Chautauqua workflow system. In: Proceedings of the international conference on system science. Maui, Hawaii

  40. Sadiq S, Marjanovic O, Orlowska M (2000) Mananging change and time in dynamic workflow processes. IJCIS 9(1+2):93–116

    Google Scholar 

  41. Reichert M, Dadam P (1998) ADEPT flex —supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. JIIS 10(2):93–129

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rinderle S, Reichert M, Dadam P (2005) Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems—a survey. Data Knowl Eng (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology, Alt Moabit 96a, 10559, Berlin, Germany

    Nikolaus Kleiner

Authors
  1. Nikolaus Kleiner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolaus Kleiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleiner, N. Delta analysis with workflow logs: aligning business process prescriptions and their reality. Requirements Eng 10, 212–222 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-005-0004-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-005-0004-7

Keywords