Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recommending software features for mobile applications based on user interface comparison

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Requirements Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

App features are one of the most important factors that people consider when choosing apps. In order to satisfy users’ needs and attract their eyes, deciding what features should be added in next release becomes very important. Different from traditional requirement elimination, app stores provide a new platform for developers to gather requirements and perform market-wide analysis. Considering that software features provided to users can be found out by exploring existing apps, an important way to elicit requirements is analyzing existing features provided by products which offer related functions and then finding new trends and fashions promptly. In this context, we propose a data-driven approach for recommending software features of mobile applications based on user interface comparison. Our approach mines similar user interfaces (UIs) from publicly available online repository. To calculate UI similarity through the best matches of components of two UIs, text similarity is used to measure the similarity of UI components and genetic algorithm is introduced to improve the comparison efficiency. Then, we develop an algorithm to extract features from similar UIs based on a set of identification rules. These features are further clustered with text similarity algorithm and finally recommended to developers. The approach is empirically validated with 44 features from 10 UIs. The experiment results indicate that our recommended features are valuable for requirement elicitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://appdata.sysu.edu.cn/survey2.html.

  2. http://appdata.sysu.edu.cn/appprofiler.

  3. http://www.1mobile.com.

  4. https://f-droid.org/.

  5. http://appdata.sysu.edu.cn/survey1.html.

  6. http://wordnet.princeton.edu/.

  7. https://github.com/NLPchina/ansjseg.

  8. http://www.iteye.com/magazines/102.

References

  1. Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2013) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. Multimedia services in intelligent environments. Springer, Berlin, pp 734–749

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balabanovi M, Shoham Y (1997) Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. Commun ACM 40(3):66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen J, Alalfi M, Dean T, Zou Y (2015) Detecting android malware using clone detection. J Comput Sci Technol 30(5):942–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen N, Lin J, Hoi S, Xiao X, Zhang B (2014) AR-miner: mining informative reviews for developers from mobile app marketplace. In: Proceedings of the 36th international conference on software engineering, May 31–June 7, 2014, pp 767–778

  5. Chia P, Yamamoto Y, Asokan N (2012) Is this app safe? A large scale study on application permissions and risk signals. In: Proceedings of the 21st international world wide web conference, April 2012, pp 311–320

  6. Coughlan J, Macredie R (2002) Effective communication in requirements elicitation: a comparison of methodologies. J Requir Eng 7(2):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumitru H, Gibiec M, Hariri N, Cleland-Huang J, Mobasher B, Castro-Herrera C, Mirakhorli M (2011) Ondemand feature recommendations derived from mining public product descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on software engineering, May 2011, pp 181–190

  8. Frank M, Dong B, Felt A, Song D (2012) Mining permission request patterns from android and facebook applications. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on data mining, Dec. 2012, pp 870–875

  9. Galvis Carreno L, Winbladh K (2013) Analysis of user comments: an approach for software requirements evolution. In: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on software engineering, May 2013, pp 582–591

  10. Goldberg D (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, machine learing. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gorla A, Tavecchia I, Gross F, Zeller A (2014) Checking app behavior against app descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 36th international conference on software engineering, May 31–June 7, 2014, pp 102–1035

  12. Guzman E, Maalej W (2014) How do users like this feature? A fine grained sentiment analysis of app reviews. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international requirements engineering conference, Aug. 2014, pp 153–162

  13. Hadar I, Kenzi SP (2014) The role of domain knowledge in requirements elicitation via interviews: an exploratory study. J Requir Eng 19(2):143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hariri N, Castroherrera C, Mirakhorli M, Clelandhuang J, Mobasher B (2013) Supporting domain analysis through mining and recommending features from online product listings. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 39(12):1736–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harman M, Jia Y, Zhang Y (2012) App store mining and analysis: MSR for app stores. In: Proceedings of the 9th working conference on mining software repositories, June 2012, pp 108–111

  16. He P, Zhu J, Xu J, and Lyu MR (2014) Locationbased hierarchical matrix factorization for web service recommendation. In: Proceeding of 21st IEEE international conference on web services, 2014, pp 297–304

  17. Holland J (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iacob C, Harrison R (2013) Retrieving and analyzing mobile apps feature requests from online reviews. In: Proceedings of the 10th working conference on mining software repositories, May 2013, pp 41–44

  19. Knauss A (2012) On the usage of context for requirements elicitation: end-user involvement in IT ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the 20th international requirements engineering conference, Sept. 2012, pp 345–348

  20. Lami G, Ferguson R (2007) An empirical study on the impact of automation on the requirements analysis process. J Comput Sci Technol 22(3):338–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lim SL, Bentley PJ, Kanakam N, Ishikawa F, Honiden S (2015) Investigating country differences in mobile app user behavior and challenges for software engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 41(1):40–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin D (1998) Extracting collocations from text corpora. In: Proceedings of the first workshop on computational terminology 1998, pp 57–63

  23. Linares-Vasquez M, Bavota G, Bernal Cardenas C, Penta M, Oliveto R, Poshyvanyk D (2013) API change and fault proneness: a threat to the success of android apps. In: Proceedings of the 9th joint meeting on foundations of software engineering, Aug. 2013, pp 477–487

  24. Lin J, Sugiyama K, Kan MY, Chua TS (2013) Addressing coldstart in app recommendation: Latent user models constructed from twitter followers. In: Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR 13. ACM, 2013, pp 283–292

  25. Lin J, Sugiyama K, Kan MY, Chua TS (2014) New and improved: modeling versions to improve app recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR 14. ACM, 2014, pp 647–656

  26. Li K, Xu ZH, Chen X (2014) A platform for searching UI component of android application. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on digital home, Nov. 2014, pp 205–210

  27. Maalej W, Nabil H (2015) Bug report, feature request, or simply praise on automatically classifying app reviews. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on software engineering, Aug. 2015, pp 116–125

  28. Martin W, Sarro F, Jia Y, Harmanl M (2016) A survey of app store analysis for software engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 99:1

    Google Scholar 

  29. Massey A, Eisenstein J, Anton A, Swire P (2013) Automated text mining for requirements analysis of policy documents. In: Proceedings of the 21st international requirements engineering conference, July 2013, pp 4–13

  30. Mei J, Zhu Y, Gao Y (1996) Tongyici Cilin. Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ng Y, Zhou H, Ji Z, Luo H, Dong Y (2014) Which android app store can be trusted in china? In: Proceedings of the 38th computer software and applications conference, July 2014, pp 509–518

  32. Pagano D, Maalej W (2013) User feedback in the appstore: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 21st international requirements engineering conference, July 2013, pp 125–134

  33. Pedersen T, Patwardhan S, Michelizzi J (2004) WordNet: similarity-measuring the relatedness of concepts. In: Proceedings of the 19th national conference on artificial intelligence, July 2004, pp 1024–1025

  34. Sakhnini V, Mich L, Berry D (2012) The effectiveness of an optimized EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for web site requirements elicitation. J Requir Eng 17(3):171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sarro F, Al-Subaihin A, Harman M, Jia Y (2015) Feature lifecycles as they spread, migrate, remain, and die in app stores. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international requirements engineering conference, Aug. 2015, pp 76–85

  36. Sharma S, Pandey S (2014) Requirements elicitation: issues and challenges. In: International conference on computing for sustainable global development, March 2014, pp 151–155

  37. Sutcliffe A, Sawyer P (2013) Requirements elicitation: towards the unknown unknowns. In: Proceedings of the 21st international requirements engineering conference, July 2013, pp 92–104

  38. Tian J, Zhao W (2010) Words similarity algorithm based on Tongyici Cilin semantic web adaptive learning system. J Jilin Univ 28(6):602–608

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tong Y, She J, Chen L (2015) Towards better understanding of app functions. J Comput Sci Technol 30(5):1130–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yin P, Luo P, Lee WC, Wang M (2013) App recommendation: a contest between satisfaction and temptation. In: Proceeding of ACM international conference on web search and data mining 2013, pp 395–404

  41. Yu H, Lian Y, Yang S, Tian L, Zhao X (2016) Recommending features of mobile applications for developer. In: Proceeding of advanced data mining and applications. Springer International Publishing

  42. Zou Q, Chen X, Huang Y (2015) Topic matching based change impact analysis from feature on user interface of mobile apps. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on software engineering and knowledge engineering, July 2015, pp 477–482

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFB1004804), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61672545, 61722214), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (No. 2015B010129008) and the Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme 2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zibin Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Zou, Q., Fan, B. et al. Recommending software features for mobile applications based on user interface comparison. Requirements Eng 24, 545–559 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-018-0303-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-018-0303-4

Keywords

Navigation