Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An ethnography of communication approach to mobile product testing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Product testing of mobile communication technology has typically employed the same research methodologies that were traditionally applied to stationary technology. An approach that does not primarily rely on physical location to study mobile communication technologies is thus needed. The stable component of mobile communication technology is not physical space but human communication. Therefore, a research model is developed based on an ethnography of communication approach, which designates “talk” (i.e., symbolic communication) as the primary and essential unit of measurement while making stationary physical location secondary. This allows design teams to enter a user “speech community” anywhere. Eight participants tested both the stationary and mobile version of customer relationship management software for sales. All participants were professional salespeople, comprising a speech community. Users articulated their “local” speech community meaning systems in the form of scenarios of use, which can guide product design and marketing. The findings show that proof-of-concept testing of mobile versions of desktop software can be done in conjunction with the usability testing for stationary technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diggins T, Tolmie P (2003) The ‘adequate’ design of ethnographic outputs for practice: some explorations of the characteristics of design resources. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 7:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Iacucci G, Kuutti K (2002) Everyday life as a stage in creating and performing scenarios for wireless devices, Pers Ubiquitous Comput 6:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marti P, Gabrielli F, Pucci F (2001) Situated interaction in art. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 5:71–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tamminen S, Oulasvirta A, Toiskallio K, Kankainen A (2004) Understanding mobile contexts. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 8:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weilenmann A (2001) Negotiating use: making sense of mobile technology. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 5:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeSanctis G, Monge P (1998) Communication processes for virtual organizations. J Comput Mediated Commun 3(4), from the World Wide Web http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue4/desanctis.html#Communication

  7. Ahuja MK, Carley KM (1998) Network structure in virtual organizations. J Comput Mediated Commun, 3(4), the World Wide Web http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue4/ahuja.html

  8. Bosch Sijtsema P (2002) A structure of roles within virtual organizations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 1(3):371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Conner DS (2003) Social comparison in virtual work environments: an examination of contemporary referent selection. J Occup Organ Psychol 76:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eason K (2001) Changing perspectives on the organizational consequences of information technology. Behav Inf Technol 20(5):323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson F (1999) Cultural control within the virtual organization. Sociol Rev 47(4):672–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wiesenfeld BM, Raghuram S, Garud R (1999) Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organ Sci 10(6):777–790

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen KV, Fogelgren A, Varshney U (2003) Mobile organizing using information technology (MOBIT). Inf Commun Soc 6(2):211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bauman R, Sherzer J (1975) The ethnography of speaking. Annu Rev Anthropol 4:95–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fitch KL (1998) Text and context: a problematic distinction for ethnography. Res Lang Soc Interact 31(1):91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitch KL (1994) The issue of selection of objects of analysis in ethnographies of speaking. Res Lang Soc Interact 27(1):57–93

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hymes D (1964) Introduction: towards ethnographies of communication. Am Anthropol 66(6):1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ojha AK (2003) Humor: a distinct way of speaking that can create cultural identity. J Intercult Commun Res 32(3):161–174

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Weider DL (1999) Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, microanalysis, and the ethnography of speaking (EM-CA-MA-ES): resonance and basic issues. Res Lang Soc Interact 32(1&2):163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perry M, Sanderson D (1998) Coordinating joint design work: the role of communication and artefacts. Des Stud 19:27–288

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wellman B (2004) The three ages of internet studies: ten, five, and zero years ago. New Media Soc 6(1):123–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Crossan MM (1998) Improvisation in action. Organ Sci 9(5):593–599

    Google Scholar 

  23. DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ Sci 5:121–147

    Google Scholar 

  24. Macredic RD, Sandom C (1999) IT-enabled change: evaluating and improvisational perspective. Eur J Inf Syst 8:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miner AS, Bassoff P, Moorman C (2001) Contours of organizational improvisation and learning: a field study. Adm Sci Q 46:304–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Orlikowski WJ, Hofman JD (1997) An improvisational model for change management: the case of groupware technologies. Sloan Manag Rev 38(2):11–21

    Google Scholar 

  27. Orlikowski WJ (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Inf Syst Res 7(1):63–92

    Google Scholar 

  28. Poole MS, DeSanctis G (1990) Understanding the use of group decision support systems: the theory of adaptive structuration. In: Fulk J, Steinfield CW (eds) Organizations and communication technology. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 173–193

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yates J, Orlikowski WJ (1999) Explicit and implicit structuring of genres: electronic communication in a Japanese R&D organization. Organ Sci 10:83–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC (1994) Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans Inf Syst 12(2):174–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dumas J, Redish J (1999) A practical guide to usability testing revised edition. Intellect Books, Oregon

  32. Lindlof TR, Taylor BC (2002) Qualitative communication research methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lindsley SL (1999) A layered model of problematic intercultural communication in US owned Maquiladoras in Mexico. Commun Monogr 66:145–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bateman BE (2002) Promoting openness toward culture learning: ethnographic interviews for students of Spanish. Mod Lang J 86:318–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS (2001) Intervention outcomes: a clinical application of qualitative methods. Top Lang Disord 21(4):21–36

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dumas J (2001) Usability testing methods: think–aloud protocols. In: Branaghan RJ (ed) Design by people for people: essays on usability. Usability Professionals’ Association, Chicago, pp 119–129

    Google Scholar 

  37. Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  38. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  39. Olsson E (2004) What active users and designers contribute in the design process. Interact Comput 16:377–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Croft SE (1999) Creating locales through storytelling: an ethnography of a group home for men with mental retardation. West J Commun 63(3):329–347

    Google Scholar 

  41. Decortis F, Rizzo A (2002) New active tools supporting narrative structures. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 6: 416–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mikkonen M, Vayrynen S, Ikonen V, Heikkila MO (2002) User and concept studies as tools in developing mobile communication services for the elderly. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 6:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Salvador T, Sato S (1999) Methods & tools: playacting and focus troupes: theater techniques for creating quick, intense, immersive, and engaging focus group sessions. Interactions ACM, Sept–Oct, pp 35–41

  44. Lloyd P (2000) Storytelling and the development of discourse in the engineering design process. Des Stud 21:357–373

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smith Academic Technology Center, Bentley College, 175 Forest Street, Waltham, MA, USA

    Linda M. Gallant

Authors
  1. Linda M. Gallant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda M. Gallant.

Appendix User task schedule for Palm VII usability testing

Appendix User task schedule for Palm VII usability testing

  • Task 1: Check the lead status of Nicholson investors.

  • Task 2: Find the contact for the satellite investor lead.

  • Task 3: Check your profile. (You are logged in as Daniel Smith.)

  • Task 4: You need help to change your address in your profile. Send a medium priority help message requesting how to make the change.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallant, L.M. An ethnography of communication approach to mobile product testing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 10, 325–332 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0053-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0053-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation