Skip to main content
Log in

Adapting paper prototyping for designing user interfaces for multiple display environments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multiple display environment (MDE) networks personal and shared devices to form a virtual workspace, and designers are just beginning to grapple with the challenges of developing interfaces tailored for these environments. To develop effective interfaces for MDEs, designers must employ methods that allow them to rapidly generate and test alternative designs early in the design process. Paper prototyping offers one promising method, but needs to be adapted to effectively simulate the use of multiple displays and allow testing with groups of users. In this paper, we share experiences from two projects in which paper prototyping was utilized to explore interfaces for MDEs. We identify problems encountered when applying the traditional method, describe how these problems were overcome, and distill our experiences into recommendations that others can draw upon. By following our recommendations, designers need only make minor modifications to the existing method to better realize benefits of paper prototyping for MDEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johanson B, Fox A, Winograd T (2002) The interactive workspaces project: experiences with ubiquitous computing rooms. IEEE Pervasive Comput 1(2):67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johanson B, Ponnekanti S, Sengupta C, Fox A (2001) Multibrowsing: moving web content across multiple displays. In: Proceedings of the international conference on ubiquitous computing, pp 346–353

  3. Arias E, Eden H, Fischer G, Gorman A, Scharff E (2000) Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 7(1):84–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rettig M (1994) Prototyping for tiny fingers. Commun ACM 37(4):21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Snyder C (2003) Paper prototyping: the fast and easy way to design and refine user interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner A (1990) Prototyping: a day in the life of an interface designer. In: Laurel B (ed) The art of human-computer interface design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 79–84

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biehl JT, Bailey BP (2004) ARIS: An interface for application relocation in an interactive space. In: Proceedings of graphics interface, London, Ontario, Canada, pp 107–116

  8. Biehl JT, Bailey BP (2005) A toolset for constructing and supporting iconic interfaces for interactive workspaces. In: Proceedings of the Tenth IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), Rome, Italy, pp 699–712

  9. Cook DJ, Metcalf HE, Bailey BP (2005) SCWID: A tool for supporting creative work in design. UIUCDCS-R-2005–2556, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  10. Stefik M, Foster G, Bobrow DG, Kahn K, Lanning S, Suchman L (1987) Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings. Commun ACM 30(1):32–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mark G, Haake J, Streitz N (1996) Hypermedia structures and the division of labor in meeting room collaboration. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, pp 170–179

  12. Román M, Hess C, Cerqueira R, Ranganathan A, Campbell R, Nahrstedt K (2002) Gaia: a middleware infrastructure to enable active spaces. IEEE Pervasive Comput 1(4):74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johanson B, Fox A (2002) The event heap: a coordination infrastructure for interactive workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE workshop on mobile computing systems and applications (WMCSA), pp 83–93

  14. Biehl JT, Bailey BP (2006) Improving interfaces for managing applications in multiple-device environments. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advanced visual interfaces (AVI), Venice, Italy, pp 35–42

  15. Rudd J, Stern K, Isensee S (1996) Low vs. high-fidelity prototyping debate. ACM Mag 3(1):76–85

    Google Scholar 

  16. Polson P, Lewis C, Rieman J, Wharton C (1992) Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. Int J Man Mac Stud 36(5):741–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nielsen J, Molich R (1990) Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 249–256

  18. Landay JA, Myers BA (1995) Interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 43–50

  19. Sinha AK, Landay JA (2003) Capturing user tests in a multimodal, multidevice informal prototyping tool. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on multimodal interfaces, pp 117–124

  20. Dahlbäck N, Jönsson A, Ahrenberg L (1993) Wizard of oz studies - why and how. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent user interfaces, pp 193–200

  21. Tran QT, Calcaterra G, Mynatt ED (2005) Cook’s Collage: Deja Vu display for a home kitchen. In: Proceedings of home oriented informatics and telematics, York, United Kingdom, pp 15–32

  22. Everitt K, Shen C, Ryall K, Forlines C (2006) Multispace: enabling electronic document micro-mobility in table-centric, multi-device environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on horizontal interactive human-computer systems (tabletop), Adelaide, Australia, pp 27–34

  23. Myers BA (2001) Using hand-held devices and pcs together. Commun ACM 44(11):34–41

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Ponnekanti SR, Lee B, Fox A, Hanrahan P, Winograd T (2001) iCrafter: a service framework for ubiquitous computing environments. In: Proceedings of the international conference on ubiquitous computing, pp 56–75

  25. Rekimoto J, Saitoh M (1999) Augmented surfaces: a spatially continuous work space for hybrid computing environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp 378–385

  26. Shen C, Everitt K, Ryall K (2003) Ubitable: impromptu face-to-face collaboration on horizontal interactive surfaces. In: Proceedings of the international conference on ubiquitous computing, pp 281–288

  27. Streitz NA, Geißler J, Holmer T, Konomi S, Müller-Tomfelde C, Reischl W, Rexroth P, Seitz P, Steinmetz R (1999) I-Land: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 120–127

  28. Tan DS, Meyers B, Czerwinski M (2004) WinCuts: manipulating arbitrary window regions for more effective use of screen space. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria, pp 1525–1528

  29. Tandler P, Prante T, Müller-Tomfelde C, Streitz NA, Steinmetz R (2001) ConnecTables: dynamic coupling of displays for the flexible creation of shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, Orlando, Florida, pp 11–19

  30. Su RE, Bailey BP (2005) Put them where? towards guidelines for positioning large displays in interactive workspaces. In: Proceedings of the Tenth IFIP TC13 international conference on human-computer interaction (INTERACT), pp 337–349

  31. YamamotoY, Nakakoji K (2005) Interaction design of tools for fostering creativity in the early stages of information design. Int J Hum Comput Stud 63(4–5):513–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lewis C, Rieman J (1993) Task-centered user interface design: a practical introduction. University of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  33. Biehl JT, Bailey BP (2006) Improving scalability and awareness in iconic interfaces for multiple-device environments. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advanced visual interfaces (AVI), Venice, Italy, pp 91–94

  34. Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1984) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  35. Paulus P, Yang H-C (2000) Idea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations. Org Behav Hum Dec Process 82(1):76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gutwin C, Greenberg S (1999) The effects of workspace awareness support on the usability of real-time distributed groupware. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 6(3):243–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wallace J, Inkpen K (2006) Interfacing with interactive workspaces: extending the desktop. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, workshop on information visualization and interaction techniques for collaboration across multiple displays

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Tony Chang, Fen Lu, and Ramona Thompson for helping us conduct many of the evaluations. We also thank Roy Campbell, Klara Nahrstedt, and Dave Semeraro for allowing us to use their labs and equipment in our studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian P. Bailey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bailey, B.P., Biehl, J.T., Cook, D.J. et al. Adapting paper prototyping for designing user interfaces for multiple display environments. Pers Ubiquit Comput 12, 269–277 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0147-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0147-2

Keywords

Navigation