Skip to main content
Log in

The experience of photologging: global mechanisms and local interactions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an in-depth study of the photologging behaviour of a small group of women who are part of an active expatriate community. In addition to sharing with family and friends in their home country, the participants appropriated the photolog as part of local social interactions both with local friends and as part of their role in the local community. The photographs themselves sometimes resemble those of physical albums, but also include more candid, imperfect and apparently trivial topics. The participants report a subtle pattern of prospective anticipation of the impact of postings and retrospective reflection and discussion of others’ postings, linking posters and viewers of photologs in a rich unfolding web of interactions within an extended episodic experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Permission has been granted by participants from this study to publish some of their photographs for this paper.

  2. One of the authors is a member of the community.

  3. Consent to publish some of the participants photographs was obtained.

  4. The term ‘lurker’ has many negative connotations, and press reporting of our work on photolurking has often picked up on these. However, as is discussed in more detail elsewhere [5] the photolurker’s actions are an important part of the photologging ecology, and may be why the photologger posts pictures. For example, visit counters act to expose the level of photolurking and hence enhance these social effects, giving feedback and kudos to the photologger.

  5. Theory of Mind (ToM) in philosophy and psychology refers to the ability to ‘put oneself in another’s shoes’, to understand that others have beliefs and desires different from one's own; the emergence of ToM is seen as a key stage in child development and essential for social interaction [32].Often ToM distinguishes first order theory of mind (A’s understanding of B’s beliefs) from second-order ToM (A’s understanding of B’s beliefs about A). While third order is possible “I’d hate to think she thought I’d lied to her”, we soon struggle with more complex levels, as demonstrated by the Kursaal Flyers’ 1976 one-hit wonder, “Little does she know that I know that she knows that I know she’s two-timing me”. Note that our second-order level of reflection corresponds to first-order ToM; this is because here the first-order effect is the experience itself. ToM’s levels tend to be one less than other uses of first-/second-order as by definition ToM is already a second-order phenomenon.

  6. A Kebaya is a traditional blouse worn by women in Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei and Singapore, sometimes made from sheer material and usually worn with a sarong, batik, or other traditional knitted garment. The kebaya silhouette gives emphasis to a womanly figure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kebaya.

  7. Abang = elder brother in English.

  8. Hensem = handsome in English.

  9. There is an additional reflexiveness in the role of the camera in these ‘ordinary things made special’. In some cases they have already been given significance by the attention paid to them and the subsequent realization of that significance captured ‘on film’ (or at least pixels). However, equally often, it is the act of taking a photograph that is itself instrumental in the ‘making special’.

  10. However, a follow-up study found that several participants had migrated to Flickr, leaving Fotopages as a ‘dead’ archive. What seems like a crucial archive may not be so permanent if accounts lapse, or if, in harsh economic times, the company hosting the photolog fails.

References

  1. McEwan G, Greenberg S (2005) Supporting social worlds with the community bar. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. ACM, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA

  2. Still K et al (2004) The role of technology in Interest-based communities: interactivity, immersion and connectivity. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence, IEEE

  3. Becker SA, Sugumaran R, Pannu K (2004) The use of mobile technology for proactive healthcare in tribal communities. In: The proceedings of the 2004 annual national conference on Digital government research. ACM: Seattle, WA, USA

  4. Mynatt ED et al (1998) Network communities: something old, something new, something borrowed…. Comput Support Co-op Work 7(1–2):123–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khalid H, Dix A (2006) From selective indulgence to engagement: exploratory studies on photolurking. In: British HCI 2006 conference. Queen Mary, University of London

  6. Coe B (1977) The Snapshot photograph: the rise of popular photography, 1888–1939. Taplinger, London

  7. Spence J, Holland P (1991) Family Snaps; the meanings of domestic photography. Virago Press, London

  8. Ying LY (2002) The Hun Sha Zhao: wedding photography and consumer culture in contemporary Taiwan, in The Institute of Women’s Studies. Lancaster University, Lancaster, p 332

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stange M (1989) Symbols of ideal life: social documentary photography in America 1890–1950. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 190

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frohlich D (2002) Requirements for photoware. In: 2002 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press, New Orleans, Lousiana, USA

  11. Spasojevic M et al (2005) Pervasive image capture and sharing: new social practices and implications for technology. In Ubicomp 2005. Tokyo, Japan

  12. House NV et al (2005) The uses of personal networked digital imaging: an empirical study of cameraphone photos and sharing. In CHI 05. ACM, Portland, Oregon, USA

  13. Bamford W, Coulton P Edwards R (2007) Space-time travel blogging using a mobile phone. In: Proceedings of ACE07’, ACM, Salzburg, Austria

  14. Glotz P, Bertschi S, Locke C (2005) Thumb culture: the meaning of mobile phone for society. Transcript-verlag, Bielfeld

  15. Yousef K, O’Neill E (2008) Supporting social album creation with mobile photo conferencing. In: Proceedings of co-located social practices surrounding photos at CHI 2008. ACM, Florence, Italy

  16. Nardi BA, Schiano DJ, Gumbrecht M (2004) Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary. In: Computer supported cooperative work, ACM Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA

  17. Khalid H, Dix A (2007) I know what you did last summer: what can we learn from photolog? In: Workshop: why CSCW? Web 2.0 and social software solve our problem anyway in the 10th ECSCW conference, Limerick, Ireland

  18. Garg N, Weber I (2008) Personalized tag suggestion for Flickr. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, ACM, Beijing, China

  19. Marlow C et al (2006) HT06, Tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. In: HT06, ACM, Odense, Denmark

  20. Sigurbjornsson B, Zwol Rv (2008) Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, ACM, Beijing, China

  21. Zwol Rv (2007) Flickr: who is looking? In: International conference on web intelligence. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC

  22. Negoescu RA, Gatica-Perez D (2008) Analyzing Flickr groups. In: CIVR’08, ACM, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada

  23. House NAV (2007) Flickr and public image-sharing: distant closeness and photo exhibition in computer human interaction 2007. ACM, San Jose

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cohen KR (2005) What does the photoblog want? Media Cult Soc 27(6):883–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor N et al (2007) Probing communities: study of a village photo display. In: OZCHI 2007, ACM, Adelaide, Australia

  26. Csikszentmihalyi M (1992) Flow: the psychology of happiness. Harper & Row, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. Am J Eval 27(2):237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago

  29. Khalid H, Dix A (2009) How photologs influence local social interaction. In: Proceedings of social mediating technologies workshop in CHI 09. ACM, Boston, USA

  30. Diesing P (1962) Reason in society. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fehr BA (1996) Friendship processes. SAGE Publications, California

  32. Gallagher S, Zahavi D (2008) The phenomenological mind: an introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. Routledge, USA

  33. Barthes R (2000) Camera Lucida, reflection on photography. Vintage Classic, UK, p 119

  34. Austin JL (1975) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  35. Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Ablex, Norwood

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Flynn FJ et al (2006) Helping one’s way to the top: self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J Pers Soc Psychol 91(6):1123–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sas C et al (2009) Emotional experience on facebook site. In: CHI 09, ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, Boston, USA

  38. Hyde L (2006) The gift: how the creative spirit transform the world. Connongate, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  39. Alexander VD (2001) Analysing visual material. In: Gilbert N (ed) Researching social life. SAGE Publications, London

  40. Khalid H, Dix A (2007) Designing for photolurking, in human computer interaction. British Computer Society: Lancaster University, UK

  41. Rosnow RL, Fine GA (1976) Rumor and gossip; the social psychology of hearsay. Elsevier, New York

  42. Chan A (2006) A social interaction design (SxD) guide: social media, social practices, social content. Available from: http://www.gravity7.com/articles_G7_SxD_Social_Context-12-21-06.html

  43. Cooley H (2005) the autobiographical impulse and mobile imaging: toward a theory of autobiometry. In: Proceedings of pervasive image capturing workshop at UBICOMP 2005. ACM, Tokyo, Japan

  44. Shove E et al (2007) The design of everyday life. Cultures of consumption series. Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  45. Urry J (1990) The tourist gaze: leisure and travel in contemporary societies. SAGE Publications, London

  46. Hirsch J (1981) Family Photograph: content, meaning and effect. Oxford University Press, New York. p 139

  47. Boerdam J, Martinus WO (1980) Family photographs—a sociological approach. Neth J Soc 16(2):95–119

    Google Scholar 

  48. Paster J (1994) Snapshot magic: ritual, realism and recall. University Michigan International, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  49. Goffman E (1955) Face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry J Interpers Relat 18(3):213–231

    Google Scholar 

  50. Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life, 1st edn. Penguin Books, London, p 251

    Google Scholar 

  51. Khalid H (2009) Roles and selective audiences for photo comment, Chap 12. In: Exploratory study of user experience in photologs: global mechanisms and local interactions. PhD Thesis (Submitted August 2009)

  52. Sheridan J et al (2004) Understanding interaction in Ubiquitous Guerrilla performances in playful arena. In: Proceedings of HCI 2004. Springer, Berlin

  53. Baron RA, Byrne D (2000) Social psychology, 9th edn. Pearson Education, Boston

  54. Duck S (1983) Friends, for life. The Harvester Press, London, p 181

  55. Harper R et al (2008) The past is different places: they do different thing there. In: DIS 2008. ACM, Cape Town, South Africa

  56. McCarthy J, Wright P (2004) Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dix A (2003) Deconstructing experience: pulling crackers apart. In: Blythe M et al (eds) Funology: from usability to enjoyment. Kluwer, Dodrecht, pp 165–178

  58. Dourish P (2006) Re-space-ing place: “place” and “space” ten years on. In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, Banff, Alberta, Canada

  59. Harrison S, Dourish P (1996) Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, Boston, Massachusettes, United States

  60. Auge M (1995) Non-places: introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. Verso, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank John Rooksby, Simon Kelly and Dave Martin for their valuable insights and constructive feedback during our data analysis stage, Fiona Dix for proofreading this paper and last but not least, all the participants and the Malaysian community in Lancaster. This research is partially funded by the Peel Studentship Trust, Lancaster University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haliyana Khalid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khalid, H., Dix, A. The experience of photologging: global mechanisms and local interactions. Pers Ubiquit Comput 14, 209–226 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0261-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0261-4

Keywords

Navigation