Skip to main content
Log in

Recommendation of optimized information seeking process based on the similarity of user access behavior patterns

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differing from many studies of recommendation that provided the final results directly, our study focuses on providing an optimized process of information seeking to users. Based on process mining, we propose an integrated adaptive framework to support and facilitate individualized recommendation based on the gradual adaptation model that gradually adapts to a target user’s transition of needs and behaviors of information access, including various search-related activities, over different time spans. In detail, successful information seeking processes are extracted from the information seeking histories of users. Furthermore, these successful information seeking processes are optimized as a series of action units to support the target users whose information access behavior patterns are similar to the reference users. Based on these, the optimized information seeking processes are navigated to the target users according to their transitions of interest focus. In addition to describing some definitions and measures introduced, we go further to present an optimized process recommendation model and show the system architecture. Finally, we discuss the simulation and scenario for the proposed system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. http://www.informationweek.com/blog/229211019. Accessed 19 Apr 2012

  2. Kitsuregawa (2007) Information explosion. IEEE APSCC2007 Keynote, 13 Dec 2007

  3. King HV (1947) Foreign language reading as a learning activity. Mod Lang J 31(8):519–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen C-M (2008) Intelligent web-based learning system with personalized learning path guidance. J Comput Educ Arch 51(2):787–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balabanovic M, Shoham Y (1997) Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. Commun ACM 40(3):66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Srivastava J, Cooley R, Deshpande M, Tan P-N (2000) Web usage mining: discovery and applications of usage patterns from web data. ACM SIGKDD 1(2):12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Poblete B, Baeza-Yates R (2008) Query-sets, using implicit feedback and query patterns to organize web documents. In: Proceedings of WWW2008, Beijing, Apr 2008, pp 41–48

  9. Stumme G, Hotho A, Berendt B (2006) Semantic web mining state of the art and future directions. Elsevier Web Semant Sci Serv Agents World Wide Web 4(2):124–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bilenko M, White RW (2008) Mining the search trails of surfing crowds: identifying relevant websites from user activity. In: Proceedings of WWW2008, Beijing, Apr 2008, pp 51–60

  11. Eirinaki M, Vazirgiannis M (2003) Web mining for web personalization. ACM Trans Internet Technol 3(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan T-W, Jacobsen M, Garcia-Molina H, Dayal U (1996) From user access patterns to dynamic hypertext linking. In: Proceedings of WWW1996, Paris, May 1996, pp 1007–1014

  13. Baraglia R, Silvestri F (2004) An online recommender system for large web sites. In: Proceedings of IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence (WI’04), Beijing, Sep 2004, pp 199–205

  14. Fang X, Liu Sheng OR (2004) LinkSelector, a web mining approach to hyperlink selection for web portals. ACM Trans Internet Technol 4(2):209–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pyshkin E, Kuznetsov A (2010) Approaches for web search user interfaces: how to improve the search quality for various types of information. JoC 1(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  16. Klyuev V, Oleshchuk V (2011) Semantic retrieval: an approach to representing, searching and summarizing text documents. IJITCC 1(2):221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klyuev V, Yokoyama A (2010) Web query expansion: a strategy utilising Japanese WordNet. JoC 1(1):23–28

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shtykh RY, Jin Q (2011) A human-centric integrated approach to web information search and sharing. Hum-Centric Comput Inf Sci 1(2):1–37

    Google Scholar 

  19. van der Aalst WMP (1998) The application of petri nets to workflow management. J Circuits Syst Comput 8(1):21–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Agrawal R, Gunopulos D, Leymann F (1998) Mining process models from workflow logs. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on extending database technology (EDT 1998), Valencia, Spain, Mar 1998, pp 469–483

  21. Cook JE, Wolf AL (1998) Discovering models of software processes from event-based data. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 7(3):215–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van der Aalst WMP (2005) Business alignment: using process mining as a tool for delta analysis and conformance testing. Requir Eng 10(3):198–211 Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. van der Aalst WMP (2012) Process mining put into context. Internet Comput IEEE 16(1):82–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van der Aalst WMP (2011) Process mining: discovery, conformance, and enhancement of business processes. Springer, Heidelberg

  25. van Dongen BF, van der Aalst WMP (2005) A meta model for process mining data. Conf Adv Inf Syst Eng 161:309–320

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kuutti K (1996) Activity theory as a potential framework for human–computer interaction research. In: Nardi B (ed) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human–computer interaction. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 17–44

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen J, Shtykh RY, Jin Q (2009) Gradual adaption model for information recommendation based on user access behavior. Int J Adv Intell Syst 2(1):192–202

    Google Scholar 

  28. http://b.hatena.ne.jp/. Accessed 19 Apr 2012

  29. http://wordnet.princeton.edu/. Accessed 19 Apr 2012

  30. http://www.positivearticles.com/Article/92-of-Search-Engine-Users-View-First-Three-Pages-of-Search-Results/48338. Accessed 19 Apr 2012

  31. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4900742.stm. Accessed 19 Apr 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work has been partly supported by 2011 and 2012 Waseda University Grants for Special Research Project No. 2011B-259 and No. 2012B-215, and 2010–2012 Waseda University Advanced Research Center for Human Sciences Project “Distributed Collaborative Knowledge Information Sharing Systems for Growing Campus.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qun Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, J., Zhou, X. & Jin, Q. Recommendation of optimized information seeking process based on the similarity of user access behavior patterns. Pers Ubiquit Comput 17, 1671–1681 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0601-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0601-7

Keywords

Navigation