Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance comparisons of geometric multigrid solvers and balancing domain decomposition solvers

  • ExaSolvers
  • Published:
Computing and Visualization in Science

Abstract

Multigrid and domain-decomposition methods are now widely used in large-scale simulation studies. Meanwhile, many types of preconditioners are available for speeding the convergence. Users of analysis models are interested in the method or preconditioner that minimizes the computing time. In this paper, we analyze a thermal problem and a solid problem using two free, open-source software programs—the UG4 framework and the ADVENTURE system—based on geometric multigrid (GM) solvers and balancing domain-decomposition (BDD) solvers. We examine and report the computing times and iteration numbers to convergence of the two programs, and generate a common software interface between the UG4 framework and ADVENTURE system. Through this software interface, we can compare the solvers of the two software systems using the same mesh data. The results were presented on the CX400 system at the Information Technology Center of Nagoya University, Japan. The convergence rate of GM solver improved after suitable smoothing and scaling to finer grids. The BDD solver is suitable for large-scale analyses of structures with detailed and complex geometries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hackbusch, W.: Multi-grid Methods and Applications, vol. 4. Springer, Berlin (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Glowinski, R., Dinh, Q.V., Periaux, J.: Domain decomposition method for nonlinear problems in fluid dynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 40, 27–109 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Quarteroni, A., Vali, A.: Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergen, B., Gradl, T., Rude, U., Hulsemann, F.: A massively parallel multigrid method for finite elements. Comput. Sci. Eng. 8(6), 56–62 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sampath, R., Biros, G.: A parallel geometric multigrid method for finite elements on octree meshes. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 32, 1361–1392 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Sundar, H., Biros, G., Burstedde, C., Rudi, J., Ghattas, O., Stadler, G., Parallel geometric-algebraic multigrid on unstructured forests of octrees. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC12, pp. 43:1–43:11. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (2012)

  7. Home page of UG4 framework. http://gcsc.uni-frankfurt.de/simulation-and-modelling/ug4

  8. Reiter, S., Vogel, A., Heppner, I., Rupp, M., Wittum, G.: A massively parallel geometric multigrid solver on hierarchically distributed grids. Comput. Vis. Sci. 16(4), 151–164 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vogel, A., Reiter, S., Rupp, M., Nägel, A., Wittum, G.: UG4—a novel flexible software system for simulating PDE based models on high performance computers. Comput. Vis. Sci. 16(4), 165–179 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yagawa, G., Shioya, R.: Parallel finite elements on a massively parallel computer with domain decomposition. Comput. Syst. Eng. 4, 495–503 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mandel, J., Brezina, M.: Balancing domain decomposition for problems with large jumps in coefficients. Math. Comput. 65(216), 1387–1401 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Home page of ADVENTURE system. http://adventure.sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp

  13. Yoshimura, S., Shioya, R., Noguchi, H., Miyamura, T.: Advanced general-purpose computational mechanics system for large scale analysis and design. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 149, 279–296 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshimura, S., Kobayashi, K., Akiba, H., Suzuki, S., Ogino, M.: Seismic response analysis of full-scale boiling water reactor using three-dimensional finite element method. Trans. At. Energy Soc. Jpn. 11(3), 203–221 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyamura, T., Akiba, H., Hori, M.: Large-scale seismic response analysis of super-high-rise steel building considering soil-structure interaction using K computer. Int. J. High-Rise Build. 4(1), 75–83 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shioya, R., Ogino, M., Kanayama, H., Tagami, D.: Large scale finite element analysis with a balancing domain decomposition method. Key Eng. Mater. 253–244, 21–26 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shioya, R., Kanayama, H., Mukaddes, A.M.M., Ogino, M.: Heat conductive analysis with balancing domain decomposition method. Theor. Appl. Mech. 52, 43–53 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kawai, H., Ogino, M., Shioya, R., Yoshimura, S.: Performance evaluation of ADVENTURE on K computer. MI Lect. Note Ser. 45, 83–97 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Home page of Promesh software. http://promesh3d.com

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by one of Japan Science and Technology (JST), CREST projects and the German Research Foundation (DFG). The CREST projects named “Development of Numerical Library Based on Hierarchical Domain Decomposition for Postpeta Scale Simulation”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Computational Mechanics Research, Toyo University, 2100 Kujirai, Kawagoe, Saitama, 3508585, Japan

    Hongjie Zheng

  2. Faculty of Information Sciences and Arts, Toyo University, 2100 Kujirai, Kawagoe, Saitama, 3508585, Japan

    Ryuji Shioya & Hiroshi Kawai

  3. Goethe Center for Scientific Computing (G-SCS), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Kettenhofweg 139, 60325, Frankfurt, Germany

    Sebastian Reiter & Gabriel Wittum

Authors
  1. Hongjie Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryuji Shioya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hiroshi Kawai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sebastian Reiter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gabriel Wittum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuji Shioya.

Additional information

Communicated by Babett Lemke.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, H., Shioya, R., Kawai, H. et al. Performance comparisons of geometric multigrid solvers and balancing domain decomposition solvers. Comput. Visual Sci. 23, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791-020-00323-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791-020-00323-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation