Skip to main content
Log in

Semantic Web enabled digital repositories

  • Published:
International Journal on Digital Libraries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital repositories and digital libraries are today among the most common tools for managing and disseminating digital object collections of cultural, educational, and other kinds of content over the Web. However, it is often the case that descriptive information about these assets, known as metadata, are usually semi-structured from a semantics point of view; implicit knowledge about this content may exist that cannot always be represented in metadata implementations and thus is not always discoverable. To this end, in this article we propose a method and a practical implementation that could allow traditional metadata-intensive repositories to benefit from Semantic Web ideas and techniques. In particular, we show how, starting with a semi-structured knowledge model (like the one offered by DSpace), we can end up with inference-based knowledge discovery, retrieval, and navigation among the repository contents. Our methodology and results are applied on the University of Patras institutional repository. The resulting prototype is also available as a plug-in, although it can fit, in principle, any other kind of digital repository.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Gill, T.: The CIDOC conceptual reference model: a standard for communicating cultural contents. Cultiv. Interact. Issue 9 (on line) (2003). http://www.cultivate-int.org/issue9/chios/

  2. DCMI-Libraries Working Group. Library application profile. (2004) http://dublincore.org/documents/2004/09/10/

  3. DCMI Usage Board. DCMI metadata terms. (2008) http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/

  4. Dill, S., Eiron, D., Gibson, D., et al.: SemTag and Seeker: bootstrapping the Semantic Web via automated semantic annotation. In: 12th International conference on world wide web, Budapest, Hungary (2003)

  5. Donini, F.: Complexity of reasoning. The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications, pp. 96–136 (2003)

  6. Fedora Development Team.: Fedora Open Source Repository Software: White Paper. Fedora Project (2005)

  7. Fernandez, M., Lopez, V., Motta, E., Sabou, M., Uren, V., Vallet, D., Castells, P.: Using TREC for cross-comparison between classic IR and ontology-based search models at a Web scale. In: Semantic search workshop at 18th international world wide web conference, Madrid, Spain (2009)

  8. Hendler J.: Web 3.0: chicken farms on the Semantic Web. Computer 41(1), 106–108 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S., Noppens, O.: Igniting the OWL 1.1 touch paper: the OWL API. In: OWL experiences and directions workshop, Innsbruck, Austria (2007)

  10. Horridge, M., Patel-Schneider, P.S.: Manchester Syntax for OWL 1.1. In: OWL experiences and directions workshop (2008)

  11. Horrocks, I, Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: The even more irresistible SROIQ. In: 10th international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning, pp. 57–67. AAI Press, San Diego (2006)

  12. IEEE LTSC.: Draft standard for learning object metadata (2002). http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf

  13. IEEE LTSC.: Draft recommended practice for expressing IEEE learning object metadata instances using the Dublin Core abstract model (IEEE P1484.12.4/D1) (2008). http://dublincore.org/educationwiki/DCMIIEEELTSCTaskforce?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=LOM-DCAM-newdraft.pdf

  14. Koutsomitropoulos, D.A., Tsakou, A.A., Tsolis, D.K., Papatheodorou, T.S.: Towards the development of a general-purpose digital repository. In: 6th international conference on enterprise information systems, Porto, Portugal (2004)

  15. Koutsomitropoulos D., Paloukis G., Papatheodorou T.: From metadata application profiles to semantic profiling: ontology refinement and profiling to strengthen inference-based queries on the Semantic Web. Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontol. 2(4), 268–280 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koutsomitropoulos, D., Solomou, G., Papatheodorou, T.: Semantic interoperability of Dublin Core metadata in digital repositories. In: 5th international conference on innovations in information technology, Al Ain, UAE (2008)

  17. Koutsomitropoulos, D., Solomou, G., Alexopoulos, A., Papatheodorou, T.: Digital repositories and the Semantic Web: semantic search and navigation for DSpace. In: 4th international conference on open repositories, Atlanta, USA (2009)

  18. Kruk, S.R., Decker, S., Zieborak, L.: JeromeDL—reconnecting digital libraries and the Semantic Web. In: 14th international World wide web conference, Chiba, Japan (2005)

  19. Lagoze, C., Van de Sompel, H., Nelson, M., Warner, S.: The open archive initiative protocol for metadata harvesting (2002). http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html

  20. Liebig, T., Luther, M., Noppens, O.: The OWLlink protocol. In: OWL experience and directions workshop, Virginia, USA, 2009

  21. McGuiness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web ontology language overview. W3C Recommendation (2004). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/

  22. Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Parsia, B.: OWL 2 web ontology language: structural specification and functional-style syntax. W3C Recommendation (2009). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/

  23. Nilsson, M., Powell, A., Johnston, P., Naeve, A.: Expressing Dublin Core metadata using the resource description framework (RDF). DCMI recommendation (2008). http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-rdf/

  24. Nucci, M., Hahn, D., Barbera, M.: The Talia Library Platform—rapidly building a digital library on rails. In: 4th workshop on scripting for the Semantic Web, European Semantic Web conference, Tenerife, Spain (2008)

  25. Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: OWL 2 Web ontology language: primer. W3C recommendation (2009). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/

  26. Powell, A.,Nilsson, M., Naeve, A., Johnston, P., Baker, T.: DCMI abstract model. DCMI Recommendation (2007) http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/

  27. Risse, T., Knezevic, P., Meghini, C., Hecht, R., Basile, F.: The BRICKS infrastructure—an overview. In: International conference on electronic information and visual arts, Moscow (2005)

  28. Sirin, E., Parsia, B.: SPARQL-DL: SPARQL query for OWL-DL. In: OWL experiences and directions workshop, Innsbruck, Austria (2007)

  29. Tsarkov D., Horrocks I., Patel-Schneider P.: Optimizing terminological reasoning for expressive description logics. J. Autom. Reason. 39(3), 277–316 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios A. Koutsomitropoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koutsomitropoulos, D.A., Solomou, G.D., Alexopoulos, A.D. et al. Semantic Web enabled digital repositories. Int J Digit Libr 10, 179–199 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-010-0059-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-010-0059-z

Keywords

Navigation