Skip to main content
Log in

Developing a system to cover OTHER via rudimentary objective–subjective distinction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose that the human brain develops a system to cover OTHER. This capital “OTHER” represents the transcendental other in infancy and the latent other later in life. The system grows to cover the transcendental other through the developmental process of objective–subjective distinction, and thereafter the latent other is found as a duality of the system later in life. To argue the emergence of such system regarding social conceptualization, we introduce experiments in which we verify that preschoolers abstract, categorize, and evaluate social relationships. The results show that children around 6 years old exhibit early social conceptualization and rudimentary objective–subjective distinction. Moreover, we claim that early social conceptualization is acquired through developing the heterarchical system when the experiments are regarded as communication between the participant and experimenter. Human beings may regard this heterarchical system as the self.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piaget J, Inhelder B (1948/1956) The child’s conception of space. Routledge and Paul Kegan, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Selman RL, Byrne DF (1974) A structural-developmental analysis of levels of role taking in middle childhood. Child Dev 45:803–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karmiloff-Smith A (1995) Beyond modularity: a developmental perspective on cognitive science. MIT press, Massachusetts

  4. Gunji Y-P, Kamiura M (2003) Observational heterarchy as phenomenal computing. CRPIT’03 Selected papers from the computers and philosophy conference, vol 37. Australian Computer Society Inc., Sydney, pp 39–44

  5. Gunji Y-P, Kamiura M (2004) Observational heterarchy enhancing active coupling. Phys D 198:74–105. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2004.08.021

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ariely D (2008) Predictably irrational. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Csibra G, Gergely G (2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends Cognit Sci 13(4):148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sonoda K, Kodama K, Gunji YP (2013) Awareness as observational heterarchy. Front Psychol 4

  9. Davey BA, Priestley HA (2002) Introduction to lattices and order, chapter 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 24118503 and 25730167, and carried out under the Cooperative Research Project Program of the Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuta Nishiyama.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishiyama, Y., Kato, K., Kawasaki, K. et al. Developing a system to cover OTHER via rudimentary objective–subjective distinction. Artif Life Robotics 19, 181–185 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-014-0147-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-014-0147-z

Keywords

Navigation