Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A multiple expert system for classifying fluorescent intensity in antinuclear autoantibodies analysis

  • Theoretical Advances
  • Published:
Pattern Analysis and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the present, Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) is the recommended method for the detection of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA). IIF diagnosis requires both the estimation of the fluorescent intensity and the description of the staining pattern, but resources and adequately trained personnel are not always available for these tasks. In this respect, an evident medical demand is the development of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tools that can offer a support to physician decision. In this paper we first propose a strategy to reliably label the image data set by using the diagnoses performed by different physicians, and then we present a system to classify the fluorescent intensity. Such a system adopts a multiple expert system architecture (MES), based on the classifier selection paradigm. Two different selection rules are presented and, given the application domain, the convenience of using one of them is analyzed. Different sets of operating points are determined, making the recognition system suited to application in daily practice and in a wide spectrum of scenarios. The measured performance on an annotated database of IIF images shows a low overall miss rate (<1.5%, 0.00% of false negative).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klippel JH, Dieppe PA (1998) Rheumatology, 2nd edn. Mosby International, St. Louis

  2. Kavanaugh A, Tomar R, Reveille J, Solomon DH, Homburger HA (2000) Guidelines for clinical use of the antinuclear antibody test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens. Am Coll Pathol Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:71–81

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marcolongo R, Ruffatti A, Morozzi G (2003) Presentazione linee guida del forum interdisciplinare per la ricerca sulle malattie autoimmuni (F.I.R.M.A.). Reumatismo 55:9–21

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pham BN, Albarede S, Maisonneuve P (2005) Impact of external quality assessment on antinuclear antibody detection performance. Lupus 14:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Song L, Hennink EJ, Young IT, Tanke HJ (1995) Photobleaching kinetics of fluorescein in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Biophys J 68:2588–2600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Piazza A, Manoni F, Ghirardello A, Bassetti D, Villalta D, Pradella M, Rizzotti P (1998) Variability between methods to determine ANA, anti-ds DNA and anti-ENA autoantibodies: a collaborative study with the biomedical industry. J Immunol Methods 219:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Das s.r.l. (2004) Service Manual AP16 IF Plus. Palombara Sabina (RI)

  8. Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. (2004) PhD System. http://www.bio-rad.com

  9. Perner P, Perner H, Muller B (2002) Mining knowledge for hep-2 cell image classification. J Artif Intell Med 26:161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sack U, Knoechner S, Warschkau H, Pigla U, Emmerich F, Kamprad M (2003) Computer-assisted classification of HEp-2 immunofluorescence patterns in autoimmune diagnostics. Autoimmun Rev 2:298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hiemann R, Hilger N, Michel J, Anderer U, Weigert M, Sack U (2006) Principles, methods and algorithms for automatic analysis of immunofluorescence patterns on HEp-2 cells. In: 5th International Congress on Autoimmunity, Sorrento, Italy, Autoimmunity Review and other Journals 86

  12. Soda P, Iannello G (2006) A multi-expert system to classify fluorescent intensity in antinuclear autoantibodies testing. In: Computer Based Medical Systems, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Computer Society, pp 219–224

  13. Soda P, Iannello G (2006) Experiences in ANN-based classification of immunofluorescence images. Enformatika Trans Eng Comput Technol 14:252–257

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nattkemper TW, Ritter HJ, Schubert W (2001) A neural classifier enabling high-throughput topological analysis of lymphocytes in tissue sections. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed 5:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng HD, Cai X, Chen X, Hu L, Lou X (2003) Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey. Pattern Recognit 36:2967–2991

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. De Santo M, Tortorella F, Molinara M, Vento M (2003) Automatic classification of clustered microcalcifications by a multiple expert system. Pattern Recognit 36:1467–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Ginneken B, Ter Haar Romeny BM, Viergever MA (2001) Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:1228–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tuzel O, Yang L, Meer P, Foran DJ (2007) Classification of hematologic malignancies using texton signatures. Pattern Anal Appl 10:277–290

    Google Scholar 

  19. Center for Disease Control (1996) Quality assurance for the indirect immunofluorescence test for autoantibodies to nuclear antigen (IF-ANA): approved guideline. NCCLS I/LA2-A 16

  20. Dhawan AP, Chitre Y, Kaiser-Bonasso C, Moskowitz M (1996) Analysis of mammographic microcalcifications using gray-level image structure features. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 15:246–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kittler J, Hatef M, Duin RPW, Matas J (1998) On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20:226–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Woods K, Kegelmeyer WP, Bowyer K (1997) Combination of multiple classifiers using local accuracy estimates. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19:405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuncheva LI, Bezdek JC, Duin RPW (2001) Decision template for multiple classifier fusion: an experimental comparison. Pattern Recognit 34:299–314

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobs RA, Jordan MI, Nowlan SJ, Hinton GE (1991) Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Comput 3:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stefano CD, Sansone C, Vento M (2000) To reject or not to reject: that is the question : an answer in case of neural classifiers. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 30:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rastrigin LA, Erenstein RH (1982) Method of collective recognition. Energoizdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alpaydin E, Jordan MI (1996) Local linear perceptrons for classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 7:788–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cordella LP, Foggia P, Sansone C, Tortorella F, Vento M (1999) Reliability parameters to improve combination strategies in multi-expert systems. Pattern Anal Appl 2:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cordella LP, Sansone C (2007) A multi-stage classification system for detecting intrusions in computer networks. Pattern Anal Appl 10:83–100

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Landis JR, Kock GG (1997) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Antonella Afeltra, Amelia Rigon and Danila Zennaro for their collaboration in IIF images annotation and evaluation. We also thank Dario Malosti for his constant encouragement and support. This work has been funded by Das s.r.l of Palombara Sabina (http://www.dasitaly.com), by the “Regione Lazio” under the programme “DOCUP 2000/2006-Sottomisura II.5.2-Progetto ITINERIS”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy

    Paolo Soda & Giulio Iannello

  2. Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione ed Ingegneria Elettrica, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy

    Mario Vento

Authors
  1. Paolo Soda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giulio Iannello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mario Vento
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Soda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soda, P., Iannello, G. & Vento, M. A multiple expert system for classifying fluorescent intensity in antinuclear autoantibodies analysis. Pattern Anal Applic 12, 215–226 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-008-0116-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-008-0116-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation