Skip to main content
Log in

An off-line cheque handwritten forgery detection based on feature route density matrix

  • Theoretical Advances
  • Published:
Pattern Analysis and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The security of handwritten documents is very important in authentication systems. In this paper, a forgery detection method is proposed for verifying handwritten documents. This method proposes two types of novel features: macro and micro. Macro features extract the structure of handwritten while micro features extract more detailed information. Also, the micro features try to extract some properties similar to online properties from offline data such as pen pressure and velocity. After extracting those features a PCA is applied to them which resulted in reducing the feature vector. A simple positive classifier is used separately to detect forgeries. It is very important that the weights of this classifier have been adjusted based on positive data because it is not possible to use forgery samples in adjusting phase. To test the proposed method a Persian handwritten data set was prepared using four kinds of forgeries; random, unskilled, skilled, and mimic. This data set consists of numbers written by text as reference words. The method performance using these different reference words showed the best result in correct rejection was 87 % while the correct acceptance was 97 %. We believe the proposed method can be applied to other languages by adjusting some parameters but because it is very important to have the data in high resolution format (e.g. 1,200 dpi) and none of databases have such resolution, the method was only applied to the dataset we gathered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zimmermann KP, Varady MJ (1985) Handwriter identification from one-bit quantized pressure patterns. Pattern Recognit 18(1):63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Namboodiri A, Gupta S (2007) Repudiation detection in handwritten documents. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Biometrics, pp 356–365

  3. Abuhaiba ISI (2007) Offline signature verification using graph matching. Turk J Electr Eng 15(1):89–104

    Google Scholar 

  4. Qiao Y, Liu J, Tang X (2007) Offline signature verification using online handwriting registration. In: CVPR’07. IEEE Conference on Computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1–8

  5. Schlapbach A, Bunke H (2007) A writer identification and verification system using HMM based recognizers. Pattern Anal Appl 10(1):33–43

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bensefia A, Paquet T, Heutte L (2005) A writer identification and verification system. Pattern Recognit Lett 26(13):2080–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bulacu M, Schomaker L (2006) Combining multiple features for text-independent writer identification and verification. In: Proceedings of 10th International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (IWFHR 2006), pp 281–286

  8. Bulacu M, Schomaker L, Brink A (2007) Text-independent writer identification and verification on offline arabic handwriting. In: ICDAR 2007. Ninth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, vol 2, pp 769–773

  9. Marti V, Bunke H (2002) The IAM-database: an English sentence database for offline handwriting recognition. J Doc Anal Recognit 5:39–46

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng PS (2003) Trace copy forgery detection for handwritten signature verification. In: IEEE 37th Annual International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, pp 450–455

  11. McCabe A, Trevathan J (2008) Neural network-based handwritten signature verification. J Comput 3(8):9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang C, Ding C, Meraz RF, Holbrook SR (2006) PSoL: a positive sample only learning algorithm for finding non-coding RNA genes. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 22(21):2590–2596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Helli B, Moghaddam ME (2008) A text-independent Persian writer identification system using LCS based classifier. In: IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology, 2008

  14. Helli B, Moghaddam ME (2008) Persian writer identification using extended Gabor filter. In: Image Analysis and Recognition, pp 579–586

  15. Helli B, Moghaddam ME (2009) A writer identification method based on XGabor and LCS. IEICE Electron Express 6(10):623–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Helli B, Moghaddam ME (2010) A text-independent Persian writer identification based on feature relation graph (FRG). Pattern Recognit 43(6):2199–2209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pervouchine V, Leedham G, Melikhov K (2005) Handwritten character skeletonisation for forensic document analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on applied computing, pp 754–758

  18. Hilditch CJ (1969) Linear skeletons from square cupboards. Mach Intell 4:403–420

    Google Scholar 

  19. Piyush Shanker A, Rajagopalan A (2007) Off-line signature verification using DTW. Pattern Recognit Lett 28(12):1407–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Ebrahimi Moghaddam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Helli, B., Moghaddam, M.E. An off-line cheque handwritten forgery detection based on feature route density matrix. Pattern Anal Applic 17, 747–762 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-014-0372-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-014-0372-z

Keywords

Navigation