Skip to main content
Log in

A new similarity measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the positive definiteness of the similarity matrix

  • Theoretical Advances
  • Published:
Pattern Analysis and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a generation of fuzzy set theory, intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) set theory has received considerable attention for its capability on dealing with uncertainty. Similarity measures of IF sets are used to indicate the degree of commonality between IF sets. Although several similarity measures for IF sets have been proposed in previous studies, some of those cannot satisfy the axiomatic definitions of similarity, or provide counter-intuitive cases. In this paper, a new similarity measure between IF sets is proposed. The definition of similarity matrix is also presented to depict the relations among more than two IF sets. It is proved that the proposed similarity measures satisfy the properties of the axiomatic definition for similarity measures. Comparison between the previous similarity measures and the proposed similarity measure indicates that the proposed similarity measure does not provide any counter-intuitive cases. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the proposed similarity measure can be applied to define a positive definite similarity matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Saeedi J, Faez K (2013) A classification and fuzzy-based approach for digital multi-focus image fusion. Pattern Anal Appl 16(3):365–379

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Moustakidis SP, Theocharis JB (2012) A fast SVM-based wrapper feature selection method driven by a fuzzy complementary criterion. Pattern Anal Appl 15(4):365–379

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy-sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 20:87–96

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu Z, Yager RR (2008) Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Int J Approx Reason 48(1):246–262

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Burduk R (2012) Imprecise information in Bayes classifier. Pattern Anal Appl 15(2):147–153

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Xia M, Xu Z (2010) Some new similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy values and their application in group decision making. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 19(4):430–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ye J (2011) Cosine similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Math Comput Model 53(1–2):91–97

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2000) Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 114(3):505–518

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang W, Xin X (2005) Distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recogn Lett 26(13):2063–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grzegorzewski P (2004) Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric. Fuzzy Set Syst 148(2):319–328

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen T-Y (2007) A note on distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric. Fuzzy Set Syst 158(22):2523–2525

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hung WL, Yang MS (2004) Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance. Pattern Recogn Lett 25(14):1603–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hong DH, Kim C (1999) A note on similarity measures between vague sets and between elements. Inf Sci 115(1–4):83–96

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Li F, Xu Z (2001) Similarity measures between vague sets. J Softw 12(6):922–927

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li Y, Chi Z, Yan D (2002) Similarity measures between vague sets and vague entropy. J Comput Sci 29(12):129–132

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li D, Cheng C (2002) New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern Recogn Lett 23(1–3):221–225

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell HB (2003) On the Dengfeng-Chuntian similarity measure and its application to pattern recognition. Pattern Recogn Lett 24(16):3101–3104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang Z, Shi P (2003) Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recogn Lett 24(15):2687–2693

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Y, Olson DL, Qin Z (2007) Similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy (vague) sets: a comparative analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 28(2):278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen SM (1995) Measures of similarity between vague sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 74(2):217–223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwang CM, Yang MS, Hung WL et al (2012) A similarity measure of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the Sugeno integral with its application to pattern recognition. Inf Sci 189:93–109

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang H, Yu L (2013) New distance measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and interval-valued fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 245:181–196

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Li J, Deng G (2012) The relationship between similarity measure and entropy of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 188:314–321

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Boran FE, Akay D (2014) A biparametric similarity measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition. Inf Sci 255:45–57

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Papakostas GA, Hatzimichailidis AG, Kaburlasos VG (2013) Distance and similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets: a comparative analysis from a pattern recognition point of view. Pattern Recogn Lett 34(14):1609–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hong DH, Choi C-H (2000) Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Set Syst 114(1):103–113

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaodan Wang.

Appendix 1: Definitions and properties about positive definite matrix

Appendix 1: Definitions and properties about positive definite matrix

When proving theorems concerning positive definite matrices, we use some properties of positive definite matrix. For ease of reference, some background knowledge related to positive definite matrix is shown in this part. Since all the results given below are well known, we mainly present definitions and theorems with an absence of their proofs.

Definition 9

An \(n \times n\) real symmetric matrix A is positive semidefinite (PSD) if it holds that \(\varvec{x}^{{\mathbf{T}}} \varvec{Ax} \ge \text{0}\) for every n × 1 column vector \(\varvec{x} \ne {\mathbf{0}}\).It is (strictly) positive definite (PD) if additionally: \(\varvec{x}^{{\mathbf{T}}} \varvec{Ax} = \text{0} \Rightarrow \varvec{x} = {\mathbf{0}}\).

Theorem 7

Eigenvalues of real symmetric matrix A are all real numbers.

Theorem 8

A is PSD iff its eigenvalues are nonnegative and A is PD iff its eigenvalues are strictly positive.

Theorem 9

If two matrices A and B are both PSD, A + B is also PSD.

Consequently, the sum of PSD matrices is PSD. The result is PD if there is at least one PD matrix among the PSD matrices.

Theorem 10

A set of necessary and sufficient conditions for an n × n symmetric matrix A to be PSD is that all the principal leading minors \(\Delta_{pp} (p = 1,2, \ldots ,n)\) of A must be nonnegative. Additionally, A is PD iff \(\Delta_{pp} (p = 1,2, \ldots ,n)\) is strictly positive.

Theorem 11

Let x be an n × 1 column vector, \(\varvec{x} \ne {\mathbf{0}}\). Then \(\varvec{A = xx}^{{\mathbf{T}}}\) is PSD.

Theorem 12

If A is square, symmetric and positive definite, then A can be uniquely factorized as \(\varvec{A = U}^{{\mathbf{T}}} \varvec{U}\) where U is upper triangular with positive diagonal entries (called Cholesky decomposition).

Definition 10

Let \(\varvec{A} = \text{(}a_{ij} \text{)}_{n \times n}\) denote an n × n real matrix, the area defined by \(\left| {z - a_{ii} } \right| \le \sum\nolimits_{j = 1,j \ne i}^{n} {\left| {a_{ij} } \right|}\) is called the ith Gerschgorin circle of A.

Theorem 13

Let \(\varvec{A} = \text{(}a_{ij} \text{)}_{n \times n}\) denote an n × n real matrix. Then all of its eigenvalues are in the union of its n Gerschgorin circles (known as Gerschgorin theorem).

Let λ be an arbitrary eigenvalue of A, we have:

$$\left| {\lambda - a_{ii} } \right| \le \sum\limits_{\begin{subarray}{l} j = 1, \\ j \ne i \end{subarray} }^{n} {\left| {a_{ij} } \right|} ,\quad \exists i \in \{ 1,2, \ldots ,n\} .$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Y., Wang, X. A new similarity measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the positive definiteness of the similarity matrix. Pattern Anal Applic 20, 215–226 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-015-0490-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-015-0490-2

Keywords

Navigation