Skip to main content
Log in

The gain and pain in taking the pilot seat: learning dynamics in a non immersive virtual solar system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes and analyzes the learning interactions of nine high-school students’ free exploration of a virtual solar system (VSS). The VSS is a non-immersive three dimensional virtual environment based on real NASA planetary images. The computer screen serves as a “spacecraft’s window” for the learner to “fly” between objects, to change the system’s frame of reference and its pace. A systematic analysis of participants’ real-time observable interactions together with what they said revealed that each of them created an unique learning pattern within at least five different dimensions: (1) the cognitive dimension, (2) the affective dimension, (3) the navigation dimension, (4) the interface dimension, and (5) the assistance seeking dimension. The construction of meaning emerged as a non-linear process, which includes transitions between and within these dimensions. Three different styles of learning interactions were identified, suggesting that individual differences might be enhanced due to the unique VSS’ features. Overall, the VSS served as an enriching and motivational learning experience. The design of additional navigation tools and content scaffolding might help participants’ in building a sustained deep scientific understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonietti A (2000) The representation of virtual reality in education. Educ Inf Technol 5:317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter JH (1989) Children’s understanding of familiar astronomical events. Int J Sci Educ 11:502–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton M (1998) Alternative frameworks amongst University of Plymouth Astronomy students. In: Gougenheim AP, McNally N (eds.) Recent advances in astronomy teaching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 111–117

  • Comins NF (1999) Identifying and addressing astronomy misconceptions in the classroom. In: Gouguenheim AP, McNally N, Percy (eds) New trends in astronomy teaching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 118–123

  • Dede C, Ketelhut D (2003) Designing for motivation and usability in a web-based multi-user virtual environment. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, 2003

  • Dede C, Clarke J, Ketelhut DJ, Nelson B, Bowman C (2005) Students’ motivation and learning of Science in a multi-user virtual environment. In: Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA), April 11–15, 2005, Montreal, [on-line] Available: http://www.muve.gse.harvard.edu/muvees2003/documents/motivation_muves_aera_2005.pdf

  • Dede C, Salzman M, Loftin B, Ash K (2000) The design of immersive virtual learning environments: fostering deep understandings of complex scientific knowledge. In: Jacobson MJ, Kozma RB (eds) Innovations in science and mathematics education. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 361–413

  • DiSessa A (1986) Artificial worlds and real experience. Instruct Sci 14:207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson T (1993) Artificial realities as data visualization environments. In: Wexelblat A (ed) Virtual reality: applications and explorations. Academic, Boston pp. 1–22

  • Fischer KW (1980) A Theory of cognitive development: the control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychol Rev 6:477–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman D, Feldman Y, Shamir A, Dagan T (2004) Automated creation of movie summaries in interactive virtual environment. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of IEEE VR 2004, Chicago

  • Furness TA, Winn W, Yu R (1997) Global change, VR and learning: a report for the NSF of workshops. The impact of three dimensional immersive VE on modern pedagogy, [Online], Available: http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-97–32/

  • Gazit E, Chen D (2003) Using the observer to analyze learning in virtual worlds, Behav Res Methods, Instru Comput 35:400–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves N (2005) Educational use of 3rd virtual environments: primary teachers visiting a romanesque castle. In: Méndez-Vilas A ,González-Pereira B, Mesa González J, Mesa González JA (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd international m-ICTE conference—Recent research developments in learning technologies. The 3rd international conference on multimedia ict’s’ in education,vol 1, Formatex, Cáceres: Spain, pp 427–431

  • Granott N, Parziale J (2002) Microdevelopment approach. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating T, Barnett M, Sasha AB, Hay KE (2002) The virtual solar system project: developing conceptual understanding of astronomical concepts through building three-dimensional computational models. J Sci Educ Technol 11:261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy G (2004) Promoting Cognition in Multimedia Interactivity Research. J Interact Learn Res 15(1):43–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall G (1999) Exploring assessment. Educ Inf Technol 4(3):311–327

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Noldus LPJJ, Trienes RJH, Hendriksen AHM, Jansen H, Jansen RG (2000) The Observer video-pro: new software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files. Behav Res Methods Instru Comput 32:197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum J (1985). The earth as a cosmic body. In:.Driver R (ed) Children’s ideas in science. Open University Press, Milton, pp. 35–57

  • Parker J, Heywood D (1998) The Earth and beyond: developing primary teachers’ understanding of basic astronomical events. Int J Sci Educ 20:503–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce JS, Pausch R (2004) Navigation with place representations and visible landmarks. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of IEEE VR 2004, Chicago

  • Rienks R, Poppe R, Nijholt A, Heylen D, Jovanovic N (2005) Multi-party interaction in a virtual meeting room. In: Noldus LPJJ, Grieco F, Loijens LWS, Zimmerman PH (eds) Proceedings measuring behavior. Fifth international conference on methods and techniques in behavioral research, Wageningen (to appear)

  • Schwartz MS, Fischer KW (2003) Building vs. borrowing: the challenge of actively constructing ideas. Lib Educ 89(3):22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp JG (1996) Children’s astronomical beliefs: a preliminary study of year 6 children in southwest England. Int J Sci Educ 18:685–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin M, Kim H, Kim J (2005) Relations of adopting immersive virtual reality (IVR) in a college science and students’ perception of learning environment: will VR let you step away from teacher-centered science class? In: Méndez-Vilas A, González-Pereira B, Mesa González J, Mesa González JA (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd International m-ICTE conference—recent research developments in learning technologies, the 3rd International Conference on Multimedia ICT’s’ in education,vol. 1, Formatex, Cáceres: Spain, pp. 209–214

  • Stake RE (1995) The art of case study research. Sage, New York

  • Steuer J (1995) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. In: Biocca F, Levy MR (eds) Communication in the age of virtual reality. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp. 33–56

  • Tobin K, Tippins D (1993) Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In: Tobin K (ed) The practice of constructivism in science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale pp. 3–21

  • Vosniadou S, Brewer WF (1994) Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cogn Sci 18:123–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VR (2005) Encyclopedia britannica. Retrieved December 10, 2005, from Encyclopedia Britannica Premium Service http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9001382

  • Winn W (1993) A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality. University of Washington, Washington HITL Tech. Rep. No. R93-R99

  • Yair Y, Mintz R, Litvak S (2001) 3D-virtual reality in science education: an implication for astronomy teaching. J Sci Educ Technol 20:293–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Yair Y, Schur Y, Mintz R (2003) A “thinking journey” to the planets using scientific visualization technologies. J Sci Educ Technol 12:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young M (1995) Assessment of situated learning using computer environments. J Sci Educ Technol 4(1):89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngbult C (1998) Educational uses of virtual reality technology.IDA.Document D-2128 Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elhanan Gazit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gazit, E., Yair, Y. & Chen, D. The gain and pain in taking the pilot seat: learning dynamics in a non immersive virtual solar system. Virtual Reality 10, 271–282 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0053-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0053-3

Keywords

Navigation