Skip to main content
Log in

Automated generation of engineering rationale, knowledge and intent representations during the product life cycle

  • SI: Manufacturing and Construction
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the biggest challenges in engineering design and manufacturing environments is the effective capture of and decoding of tacit knowledge. Fundamental to Life Cycle Engineering is the capture of engineering information and knowledge created at all stages of the product development process, from conceptual design through to product support and disposal. Consider this—the amount of vital information and knowledge lost when key design personnel retire—hence the need to capture meta-cognitive task-related strategies, particularly to support knowledge reuse and training. Many methods have been tried and tested with the successful few found to be very time consuming and expensive to implement and carry out; consequently, there is a need to investigate alternative paradigms for knowledge and information capture. This paper reports on a current industrial case study on knowledge capture methods employed by industrial partners in the design and manufacture of a variety of electro-mechanical products. The results suggest the need for new kinds and forms of knowledge capture methods and representation, particularly those associated with individual design engineering tasks. Following the findings, the paper presents a knowledge capture methodology for automatic real-time logging, capture and post-processing of design data from a virtual reality design system. Task-based design experiments were carried out with industrial partners to demonstrate the effective, unobtrusive and automatic capture and representation of various forms of design knowledge and information. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of knowledge representations were also performed to determine which method was most effective at conveying design knowledge and information for other engineers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernard A, Laroche F, Da-Cunha C (2009) Models and methods for knowledge formalisation in a PLM context. In: 3rd international congress design and modelling of mechanical systems CMSM’2009, Hammamet, Tunisia

  • Bolisani E, Scarso E (1999) Information technology management: a knowledge-based perspective. Technovation 19:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt SC, Morbach J, Miatidis M, Theissen M, Jarke M, Marquardt W (2008) An ontology-based approach to knowledge management in design processes. Comput Chem Eng 32:320–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukowitz W, Williams R (2000) The knowledge management fieldbook. Prentice Hall, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs R, Hull R (1998) Knowledge management practices’ and path-dependency in innovation. Res Policy 27:237–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano MA, Nobeoka K (1998) Thinking beyond lean: how multi-project management is transforming product development at Toyota and other companies. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalkir K (2005) Knowledge management in theory and practice. Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann

  • Dani TH, Gadh R (1997) Creation of concept shape design via a virtual reality interface. Comput Aided Des 29:555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, Prusak L (1997) Information ecology: mastering the information and knowledge environment. Oxford University Press, USA

  • Desroches CM (2007) Knowledge management and outsourcing in an IT environment, dissertation. University of Johannesburg, October 31st

  • Extensible Markup Language (2009) http://www.w3.org/XML/. Last viewed on Jun 9th 2009

  • Grossman M, Bates S (2008) Knowledge capture within the biopharmaceutical clinical trials environment. J Inf Knowl Manag Syst 38(1):118–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruninger M, Bock C (2005) PSL: a semantic domain for flow models. Softw Syst Model 4:209–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen LB (2001) Knowledge management and engineering practices: the case of knowledge management, problem solving and engineering practices. Technovation 21:595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks BJ, Culley SJ, Allen RD, Mullineux G (2002) A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design. Int J Inf Manag 22:263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer-Alfeis J (2008) Knowledge management solutions for the leaving expert issue. J Knowl Manag 12(4):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Integrated Definition Methods (2009) http://www.idef.com/. Last viewed on Jun 9th 2009

  • Jin Y, Ishino Y (2006) DAKA: design activity knowledge acquisition through data-mining. Int J Prod Res 44(14):2813–2837

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Bracewell RH, Wallace KM (2004) From discourse analysis to answering design questions, international workshop on the application of language and semantic technologies to support knowledge management processes, October, Whittlebury, UK

  • Koners U, Goffin K (2007) Learning from postproject reviews: a cross-case analysis. J Prod Innov Manag 24:242–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwong E, Lee WB (2009) Knowledge elicitation in reliability management in the airline industry. J Knowl Manag 13(2):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat DB (1995) CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Commun ACM 38(11):33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood K (2009) Using analogy to model spatial language use and multimodal knowledge capture, Ph.D dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, December

  • Marsh SJ, Stock GN (2003) Building dynamic capabilities in new product development through intertemporal integration. J Prod Innov Manag 20:136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam R, O’Hare T, Moffett S (2008) Collaborative knowledge sharing in composite new product development: an aerospace study. Technovation 28:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy M (1999) The knowledge life cycle. ICM conference on knowledge management, Miami, Florisa, USA

  • Meyer M, Zack M (1996) The design and implementation of information products. Sloan Manag Rev 37(3):43–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder U, Whiteley A (2007) Emerging and capturing tacit knowledge: a methodology for a bounded environment. J Knowl Manag 11(1):68–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng FM, Ritchie JM, Simmons JEL, Dewar RG (2000) Designing cable harnesses in virtual environments. JMater Process Technol 107:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale P (1998) A cognitive model of innovation. Res Policy 27:689–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver N, Dostaler I, Dewberry E (2004) New product development benchmarks: the Japanese North American and UK consumer electronics industries. J High Technol Manag Res 15:249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philbin SP (2008) Bid management: a systems engineering approach. J High Technol Manag Res 19:114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regli WC, Kopena JB, Grauer M (2011) On the long-term retention of geometry-centric digital engineering artifacts. Comput Aided Des 43:820–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter H, Schuchhard P, Abowd GD (1999) Automated capture and retrieval of architectural rationale. Online proc first working IFIP conference on software architecture (WICSA’99)

  • Ritchie JM, Simmons JEL, Dewar RG, Carpenter I (1999) A methodology for eliciting expert knowledge in virtual engineering environments. In: Kocaoglu DF, Anderson TR, Milosevic DZ, Niwa K, Tschirky H (eds) Selected volume on technology and innovation management. Portland, OR, USA, PICMET’99, pp 285–290

  • Ritchie JM, Sung RCW, Robinson G, Day PN, Dewar RG, Simmons JEL (2007) Cable harness design, assembly and installation using immersive virtual reality. Virtual Real 11:261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson G, Ritchie JM, Day PN, Dewar RG (2007) System design and user evaluation of Co-Star: an immersive stereoscopic system for cable harness design. Comput Aided Des 39(4):245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainter P, Oldham K, Larkin A, Murton A, Brimble R (2000) Product knowledge management within knowledge-based engineering systems. In: Proceedings of DETC’00, ASME 2000 design engineering technical conference and computers and information in engineering conference Baltimore, Maryland, September 10–13

  • Sanderson M (2001) Records management and the capture of tacit knowledge. Rec Manag J 11(1):7–17

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz M, Lloyd AJ (2001) Codification and tacitness as knowledge management strategies: an empirical exploration. J High Technol Manag Res 12:139–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz M, Gupta SK, Anand DK, Kavetsky R (2007) Virtual mentor: a step towards proactive user monitoring and assistance during virtual environment-based training. Performance metrics for intelligent systems (PerMIS) Workshop, Gaithersburg, MD, August

  • Sherwood AL, Covin JG (2008) Knowledge acquisition in university-industry alliances: an empirical investigation from a learning theory perspective. J Prod Innov Manag 25:162–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipman FM III, McCall RJ (1997) Integrating different perspectives on design rationale: supporting the emergence of design rationale from design communication. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manuf 11(2):141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung RCW, Robinson G, Day PN, Ritchie JM, Corney JR, Lim T (2009) Automated design process modelling and analysis using immersive virtual reality. Comput Aided Des 41(12):1082–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szykman S, Sriram RD (2006) Design and Implementation of the web-enabled NIST design repository. ACM Trans Int Technol 6(1):85–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijaykumar G, Chakrabarti A (2008) Understanding the knowledge needs of designers during design process in industry. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 8:011004-1–011004-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig K (1993) Knowledge management foundations. Schema Press, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong WLP, Radcliffe DF (2000) The tacit nature of design knowledge. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 12(4):493–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented herein was undertaken under the aegis of the Knowledge and Information Management (KIM) Through-Life Grand Challenge Project (www.kimproject.org) funded primarily by the Engineering and Physical Research Council (EPSRCGrant No EP/C534220/1), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRCGrant No RES-331-27-0006) and Heriot-Watt University‘s Innovative Design and Manufacturing Research Centre (IMRC- Grant No GR/S12395/01). The authors would finally like to offer their gratitude to the industrial collaborators for their involvement in the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond C. W. Sung.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 7.

Table 7 COSTAR user trial participant details

Appendix 2

See Table 8.

Table 8 COSTAR usability ratings

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sung, R.C.W., Ritchie, J.M., Lim, T. et al. Automated generation of engineering rationale, knowledge and intent representations during the product life cycle. Virtual Reality 16, 69–85 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-011-0196-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-011-0196-8

Keywords

Navigation