Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge dynamics assessment in complex organizational systems: a missing person investigation case study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In organizational systems commonly presented knowledge acts as a driver for achieving efficiency of organizational processes. Managing such knowledge within formal and stable systems is recognized as an essential component and relies on the ability to easily define the knowledge needs within the organization. However, trying to apply everyday approaches to complex organizational systems based on the cooperation between public and private entities, the conditions of extracting as-is information become blurred and tangible efficiency indicators cannot be jointly defined. In this paper, we present a case study of a missing person investigation that occurred in 2013 in Slovenia. With a variety of activity flows, several endings and tendency towards entity changes the investigation presents a challenging case for the identification and evaluation of knowledge that was present within the investigation process. Having the possibility to closely follow the investigation process, we collected the data through the observation and interviews of the key entities, then modelled with Tabular application development methodology, translated into the two-tier simulation model within iGrafx environment and finally analyzed with descriptive and multivariate statistics. Using the selected set of methods, we were able to design a graphical model that presents knowledge and most important interactions between knowledge resources within the investigation process. We find it as an important contribution to the understanding of knowledge dynamics within complex organizational systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Damij T (2000) An object-oriented methodology for information systems development and business process reengineering. J Object Oriented Program 13(4):23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Damij N (2007) Business process modelling using diagrammatic and tabular techniques. Bus Process Manag J 13(1):70–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, Prusak L (2000) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvad business school, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Driessen S, Huijsen W, Grootveld M (2007) A framework for evaluating knowledge-mapping tools. J Knowl Manag 11(2):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichter LS, Pyle EJ, Whitmeyer SJ (2010) Strategies and rubrics for teaching chaos and complex systems theories as elaborating, self-organizing, and fractionating evolutionary systems. J Geosci Educ 58(2):65–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganchelon Y, Shin D, Kim H, Lee S (2011) Knowledge-mapping model for construction project organizations. J Knowl Manag 15(3):528–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giebel SM, Hosser D (2013) Criminal careers of young adult offenders after release. CEJOR 21(2):411–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy J (2004) Knowledge mapping and management. Tech Commun 51(3):431–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall M (2006) Knowledge management and the limits of knowledge codification. J Knowl Manag 10(3):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang I, Park Y, Kim Y (2003) A framework for designing a workflow-based knowledge map. Bus Process Manag J 9(3):281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieslinger E, Günther M, Stummer C, Wakolbinger LM (2012) Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. CEJOR 20(2):183–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner S (2014) A simulation analysis of interactions among intended biases in costing systems and their effects on the accuracy of decision-influencing information. CEJOR 22(1):113–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lytras MD, Pouloudi A (2006) Towards the development of a novel taxonomy of knowledge management systems from a learning perspective: an integrated approach to learning and knowledge infrastructures. J Knowl Manag 10(6):64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macal CM, North MJ (2010) Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. J Simul 4(1):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackellar J (2013) Participant observation at events: theory, practice and potential. Int J Event Festiv Manag 4(1):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J (2010) After KKV the new methodology of qualitative research. World Polit 62(1):120–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall G, Jonker L (2010) A concise guide to.. descriptive statistics. Synergy 1(1):22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Ichijo K, von Krogh G (2000) Enabling knowledge creation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel S, Padh H, Bhavsar C (2013) Manova over anova—a better objective in bioequivalence study. Int J Pharm Sci Res 4(5):1874–1881

    Google Scholar 

  • Papavassiliou G, Gregoris M (2003) Knowledge modelling in weakly-structured business processes. J Knowl Manag 7(2):18–32

  • Rahman A, Shariff M (2003) Case study method for new product development in engineer-to-order organizations. Work Study 52(1):25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regős G (2013) Comparison of power plants’ risks with multi criteria decision models. CEJOR 21(4):845–865

  • Richardson KA (2011) TECS: a browser-based test environment for complex systems. Emerg Complex Organ 13(1–2):213–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Seck MD, Honig HJ (2012) Multi-perspective modelling of complex phenomena. Comput Math Organ Theory 18(1):128–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoes P, Marques RC (2011) Performance and congestion analysis of the portuguese hospital services. CEJOR 19(1):39–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderploeg RD, Groer S, Belanger Heather G (2012) Initial developmental process of a VA semistructured clinical interview for TBI identification. J Rehabil Res Dev 49(4):545–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vespignani A (2012) Modelling dynamical processes in complex socio-technical systems. Nat Phys 8(1):32–39

  • Wexler MN (2001) The who, what and why of knowledge mapping. J Knowl Manag 5(3):249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R (2003) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (CA), London, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun G, Shin D, Kim H, Lee S (2011) Knowledge-mapping model for construction project organizations. J Knowl Manag 15(3):528–548

  • Xia W, Sun J (2013) Simulation guided value stream mapping and lean improvement: a case study of a tubular machining facility. J Ind Eng Manag 6(2):456–478

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been financed by the Slovenian Research Agency ARRS, Young researcher program, ARRS-SP-2784/13 and by Creative Core FISNM-3330-13-500033 ‘Simulations’ project funded by the European Union, The European Regional Development Fund. The operation is carried out within the framework of the Operational Program for Strengthening Regional Development Potentials for the period 2007–2013, Development Priority 1: Competitiveness and research excellence, Priority Guideline 1.1: Improving the competitive skills and research excellence.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jernej Agrež.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agrež, J., Damij, N. Knowledge dynamics assessment in complex organizational systems: a missing person investigation case study. Cent Eur J Oper Res 23, 527–545 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-014-0368-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-014-0368-1

Keywords

Navigation