Skip to main content
Log in

On the criterion vectors of lines of portfolio selection with multiple quadratic and multiple linear objectives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the research for portfolio selection evolves, traditional models and models with one quadratic objective and multiple linear objectives are being solved. In this paper, I propose models with multiple quadratic and multiple linear objectives. Due to the difficulty involved, I study the new models by lines in decision space, analyze the criterion vectors of the lines by projection, and approximate the nondominated sets by the criterion vectors. As an illustration, I extend Merton’s portfolio selection model, propose algorithms to approximate the nondominated sets by the criterion vectors of portfolios with cardinality 3 and then K, and demonstrate the number of the criterion vectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The main-stream style in finance (e.g., Huang and Litzenberger (1988)’s method in Chapter 3) is an e-constraint approach, but the result is only an approximation of nondominated sets.

  2. In this paper, bold symbols (e.g., \(\mathbf x \)) denote vectors or matrices, while normal symbols (e.g., t) denote scalars.

  3. A covariance matrix can be defined as symmetric and nonnegative definite, as documented by Brockwell and Davis (1987) (pp. 33 & 35).

  4. Smooth is defined by many textbooks, e.g., that of Thomas and Finney (1998) (p. 744).

  5. Data source: The website of Dow Jones Industrial Average, http://www.djindexes.com/, and the website of Wharton Research Data Services (WRDS), https://wrds-web.wharton.upenn.edu/wrds/, October 2, 2014.

References

  • Bana e Costa CA, Soares JO (2001) Multicriteria approaches for portfolio selection: an overview. Rev Financ Mark 4(1):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Best MJ (1996) An algorithm for the solution of the parametric quadratic programming problem. In: Fischer H, Riedmüller B, Schäffler S (eds) Applied mathematics and parallel computing: festschrift for klaus ritter. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 57–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brockwell PJ, Davis RA (1987) Time series: theory and methods, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chow G (1995) Portfolio selection based on return, risk, and relative performance. Financ Anal J 51(2):54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfleitner G, Leidl M, Reeder J (2012) Theory of social returns in portfolio choice with application to microfinance. J Asset Manag 13(6):384–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M (2005) Multicriteria optimization, volume 491 of lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M, Klamroth K, Schwehm C (2004) An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization. Eur J Oper Res 155(3):752–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberger M, Qi Y, Steuer RE (2010) Large-scale MV efficient frontier computation via a procedure of parametric quadratic programming. Eur J Oper Res 204(3):581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberger M, Steuer RE, Utz S, Wimmer M, Qi Y (2013) Computing the nondominated surface in tri-criterion portfolio selection. Oper Res 61(1):169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Litzenberger RH (1988) Foundations for financial economics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen P, Yu GY (1997) A reference direction approach to multiple objective quadratic-linear programming. Eur J Oper Res 102(3):601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen P, Yu GY (1998) On computing objective function values in multiple objective quadratic-linear programming. Eur J Oper Res 106(1):184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1956) The optimization of a quadratic function subject to linear constraints. Nav Res Logist Q 3(1–2):111–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification in investments, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1991) Foundations of portfolio selection. J Financ 46(2):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (2013) How to represent mark-to-market possibilities with the general portfolio selection model. J Portf Manag 39(4):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton RC (1972) An analytical derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier. J Financ Quant Anal 7(4):1851–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedermayer A, Niedermayer D (2010) Applying Markowitz’s critical line algorithm. In: Guerard JB Jr (ed) Handbook of portfolio construction: contemporary applications of Markowitz techniques. Springer, Berlin, pp 383–400

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Hirschberger M, Steuer RE (2009) Dotted representations of mean–variance efficient frontiers and their computation. Inf Syst Oper Res 47(1):15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Spronk J, Hallerbach WG (1997) Financial modelling: Where to go? With an illustration for portfolio management. Eur J Oper Res 99(1):113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein M, Branke J, Schmeck H (2008) Efficient implementation of an active set algorithm for large-scale portfolio selection. Comput Oper Res 35(12):3945–3961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer RE (1986) Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation and application. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer RE, Qi Y, Hirschberger M (2007) Suitable-portfolio investors, nondominated frontier sensitivity, and the effect of multiple objectives on standard portfolio selection. Ann Oper Res 152(1):297–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer RE, Wimmer M, Hirschberger M (2013) Overviewing the transition of Markowitz bi-criterion portfolio selection to tri-criterion portfolio selection. J Bus Econ 83(1):61–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GB, Finney RL (1998) Calculus and analytic geometry, 9th edn. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Xidonas P, Mavrotas G, Krintas T, Psarras J (2012) Multicriteria portfolio management. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Li J (2002) A class of stochastic optimization problems with one quadratic & several linear objective functions and extended portfolio selection model. J Comput Appl Math 146(1):99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The help from Dr. Ralph E. Steuer in the Department of Finance at the University of Georgia is highly appreciated. Also acknowledged is the support from the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 14JJD630007); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71132001); and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University, IRT0926.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yue Qi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interet

The author has no further conflict of interest.

Human rights

For research involving human participants, the author doesn’t invite any human participants; and

Informed consent

For informed consent, the author doesn’t utilize any animals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, Y. On the criterion vectors of lines of portfolio selection with multiple quadratic and multiple linear objectives. Cent Eur J Oper Res 25, 145–158 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0431-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0431-6

Keywords

Navigation