Abstract
Researchers for long have hypothesized relationships between mobility, urban context, and health. Despite the ample amount of discussions, the empirical findings corroborating such associations remain to be marginal in the literature. It is growingly believed that the weakness of the observed associations can be largely explained by the common misspecification of the geographical context. Researchers coming from different fields have developed a wide range of methods for estimating the extents of these geographical contexts. In this article, we argue that no single approach yet has sufficiently been capable of capturing the complexity of human mobility patterns. Subsequently, we discuss that reaching a better understanding of individual activity spaces can be possible through a spatially sensitive estimation of place exposure. Following this discussion, we take an integrative person and place-based approach to create an individualized residential exposure model (IREM) to estimate the local activity spaces (LAS) of the individuals. This model is created using data collected through public participation GIS. Following a brief comparison of IREM with other commonly used LAS models, the article continues by presenting an empirical study of aging citizens in Helsinki area to demonstrate the usability of the proposed framework. In this study, we identify the main dimensions of LASs and seek their associations with socio-demographic characteristics of individuals and their location in the region. The promising results from comparisons and the interesting findings from the empirical part suggest both a methodological and conceptual improvement in capturing the complexity of local activity spaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams RJ, Howard N, Tucker G et al (2009) Effects of area deprivation on health risks and outcomes: a multilevel, cross-sectional, Australian population study. Int J Public Health 54:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-7113-x
Alidoust S, Bosman C, Holden G et al (2017) The spatial dimensions of neighbourhood: how older people define it. J Urban Des 22:547–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1336057
Arcury TA, Gesler WM, Preisser JS et al (2005) The effects of geography and spatial behavior on health care utilization among the residents of a rural region. Health Serv Res 40:135–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00346.x
Botte M (2015) The connection of urban form and travel behaviour: a geo-spatial approach to measuring success of transit oriented developments using activity spaces. Sort 50:500
Broberg A, Salminen S, Kyttä M (2013) Physical environmental characteristics promoting independent and active transport to children’s meaningful places. Appl Geogr 38:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.014
Brown G (2016) A review of sampling effects and response bias in internet participatory mapping (PPGIS/PGIS/VGI). Trans GIS 21:39–56
Brown G, Kyttä M (2014) Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): a synthesis based on empirical research. Appl Geogr 46:126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004
Buliung RN, Kanaroglou PS (2006) Urban form and household activity-travel behavior. Growth Change 37:172–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00314.x
Buliung RN, Roorda MJ, Remmel TK (2008) Exploring spatial variety in patterns of activity-travel behaviour: initial results from the Toronto Travel-Activity Panel Survey (TTAPS). Transportation (Amst) 35:697–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-008-9178-4
Dalgard OS, Tambs K (1997) Urban environment and mental health. A longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry 171:530–536. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.171.6.530
Diez Roux AV (2001) Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health 91:1783–1789. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1783
Diez Roux AV (2004) Estimating neighborhood health effects: the challenges of causal inference in a complex world. Soc Sci Med 58:1953–1960
Dijst M (1999a) Action space as planning concept in spatial planning. Neth J House Built Environ 14:163–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496820
Dijst M (1999b) Two-earner families and their action spaces: a case study of two Dutch communities. GeoJournal 48:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007031809319
Dye C (2008) Health and urban living. Science 319:766–769. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150198
Ewing R, Cervero R (2010) Travel and the built environment. J Am Plan Assoc 76:265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
Faist T (2013) The mobility turn: A new paradigm for the social sciences? Ethn Racial Stud 36:1637–1646
Farber S, Páez A, Morency C (2012) Activity spaces and the measurement of clustering and exposure: a case study of linguistic groups in Montreal. Environ Plan A 44:315–332. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44203
Flamm MF, Kaufmann V (2006) The concept of personal network of usual places as a tool for analysing human activity spaces: a quantitative exploration. Conf Pap STRC 2006. https://doi.org/10.1108/02580540410567256
Frank LD, Engelke PO (2001) The built environment and human activity patterns: exploring the impacts of urban Form on public health. J Plan Lit 16:202–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854120122093339
Golledge RG, Stimson RJ, Robert J (1997) Spatial behavior: a geographic perspective. Guilford Press, New York
Hamilton-Baillie B (2000) Home zones. Reconciling people, places and transport. Study tour of Denmark, Germany, Holland and Sweden, p 36
Hasanzadeh K, Broberg A, Kyttä M (2017) Where is my neighborhood? A dynamic individual-based definition of home zones. Appl Geogr 84:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.006
Holliday KM, Howard AG, Emch M et al (2017) Are buffers around home representative of physical activity spaces among adults? Health Place 45:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.013
Jarv O, Muurisepp K, Ahas R et al (2015) Ethnic differences in activity spaces as a characteristic of segregation: a study based on mobile phone usage in Tallinn, Estonia. Urban Stud 52:2680–2698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014550459
Jenks GF (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int Yearb Cartogr 7:186–190
Karusisi N, Thomas F, Méline J, Chaix B (2013) Spatial accessibility to specific sport facilities and corresponding sport practice: the RECORD Study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 10:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-48
Kestens Y, Lebel A, Daniel M et al (2010) Using experienced activity spaces to measure foodscape exposure. Health Place 16:1094–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.016
Krizek KJ (2003) Residential relocation and changes in URBAN travel: Does neighborhood-scale urban form matter? J Am Plan Assoc 69:265–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308978019
Kwan M-P (2009) From place-based to people-based exposure measures. Soc Sci Med 69:1311–1313
Kwan M-P (2012a) Geographies of Health. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 102:891–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.687348
Kwan MP (2012b) The uncertain geographic context problem. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 102:958–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.687349
Kwan M-P, Chai Y et al (2016) Urban form, car ownership and activity space in inner suburbs: a comparison between Beijing (China) and Chicago (United States). Urban Stud 53:1784–1802
Kyttä M, Broberg A (2014) The multiple pathways between environment and health. Wellbeing. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–54
Kyttä AM, Broberg AK, Kahila MH (2012) Urban environment and children’s active lifestyle: softGIS revealing children’s behavioral patterns and meaningful places. Am J Health Promot 26:e137–e148. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.100914-QUAN-310
Kyttä M, Broberg A, Haybatollahi M, Schmidt-Thome K (2015) Urban happiness: context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environ Plan B Plan Des 43:34–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515600121
Kyttä M, Broberg A, Haybatollahi M, Schmidt-Thomé K (2016) Urban happiness: context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environ Plan B Plan Des 43:34–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515600121
Laatikainen T, Tenkanen H, Kyttä M, Toivonen T (2015) Comparing conventional and PPGIS approaches in measuring equality of access to urban aquatic environments. Landsc Urban Plan 144:22–33
Lee BA, Reardon SF, Firebaugh G et al (2008) Beyond the census tract: patterns and determinants of racial segregation at multiple geographic scales. Am Soc Rev 73:766–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300504
Lee NC, Voss C, Fraser AD et al (2015) Does activity space size influence physical activity levels of adolescents? A GPS study of an urban environment. Prev Med Rep 3:75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.12.002
Lord S, Joerin F, Thériault M (2009) La mobilité quotidienne de banlieusards vieillissants et âgés: déplacements, aspirations et significations de la mobilité. Can Geogr/Le Géographe Can 53:357–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2009.00269.x
Matthews SA (2011) Spatial polygamy and the heterogeneity of place: studying people and place via egocentric methods. Commun Neighb Heal Expand Bound Place. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7482-2
Mitchell R, Popham F (2008) Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 372:1655–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X
Naess P (2012) Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context. J Transp Land Use 5:21–45. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v5i2.314
Newsome TH, Walcott WA, Smith PD (1998) Urban activity spaces: illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions. Transportation (Amst) 25:357–377. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005082827030
Patterson Z, Farber S (2015) Potential path areas and activity spaces in application: a review. Transp Rev 35:679–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1042944
Perchoux C, Chaix B, Cummins S, Kestens Y (2013) Conceptualization and measurement of environmental exposure in epidemiology: accounting for activity space related to daily mobility. Health Place 21:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.005
Perchoux C, Kestens Y, Thomas F et al (2014) Assessing patterns of spatial behavior in health studies: their socio-demographic determinants and associations with transportation modes (the RECORD Cohort Study). Soc Sci Med 119:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.026
Perchoux C, Chaix B, Brondeel R, Kestens Y (2016) Residential buffer, perceived neighborhood, and individual activity space: new refinements in the definition of exposure areas—The RECORD Cohort Study. Health Place 40:116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.05.004
Pickett KE, Pearl M (2001) Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Commun Health 55:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.2.111
Rai R, Balmer M, Rieser M et al (2007) Capturing human activity spaces: new geometries. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2021:70–80. https://doi.org/10.3141/2021-09
Schipperijn J, Stigsdotter UK, Randrup TB, Troelsen J (2010) Influences on the use of urban green space—a case study in Odense,Denmark. Urban For Urban Green. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.002
Schönfelder S, Axhausen KW (2002) Measuring the size and structure of human activity spaces. Transp Res. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-004444846
Schönfelder S, Axhausen KW (2003) Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion? Transp Policy 10:273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.07.002
Schönfelder S, Axhausen K (2004a) Structure and innovation of human activity spaces. Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs-und Raumplan 258:1–40
Schönfelder S, Axhausen KW (2004b) On the variability of human activity spaces. In: Koll-Schretzenmayr M, Keiner M, Nussbaumer G (eds) The real and virtual worlds of spatial planning. Springer, Berlin, pp 237–262
Seliske LM, Pickett W, Boyce WF, Janssen I (2009) Association between the food retail environment surrounding schools and overweight in Canadian youth. Public Health Nutr 12:1384. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980008004084
Sheller M, Urry J (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environ Plan A 38:207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
Sherman JE, Spencer J, Preisser JS et al (2005) A suite of methods for representing activity space in a healthcare accessibility study. Int J Health Geogr 4:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-4-24
Söderström P, Schulman H, Ristimäki M (2015) Urban form in the Helsinki and Stockholm city regions – Development of pedestrian, public transport and car zones (Reports of the Finnish Environment Institute No. 16/2015). https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/155224
Spielman S, Yoo E (2009) The spatial dimensions of neighborhood effects. Soc Sci Med 68:1098–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.048
Subramanian S (2004) The relevance of multilevel statistical methods for identifying causal neighborhood effects. Soc Sci Med 58:1961–1967
Thompson CW, Roe J, Aspinall P et al (2012) More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landsc Urban Plan 105:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015
Vallée J, Chauvin P (2012) Investigating the effects of medical density on health-seeking behaviours using a multiscale approach to residential and activity spaces: results from a prospective cohort study in the Paris metropolitan area. Int J Health Geogr, France. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-11-54
Vallée J, Cadot E, Roustit C et al (2011) The role of daily mobility in mental health inequalities: the interactive influence of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on depression. Soc Sci Med 73:1133–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.009
Vallée J, Le Roux G, Chaix B et al (2014) The “constant size neighbourhood trap” in accessibility and health studies. Urban Stud. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014528393
van Kamp I, van Loon J, Droomers M, de Hollander A (2004) Residential environment and health: a review of methodological and conceptual issues. Rev Environ Health 19:381–401
Van Vliet W (1983) Exploring the fourth environment an examination of the home range of city and suburban teenagers. Environ Behav 15:567–588
Weiss L, Ompad D, Galea S, Vlahov D (2007) Defining neighborhood boundaries for urban health research. Am J Prev Med 32:154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.034
Wong DWS, Shaw S-L (2011) Measuring segregation: an activity space approach. J Geogr Syst 13:127–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-010-0112-x
Zenk SN, Schulz AJ, Matthews SA et al (2011) Activity space environment and dietary and physical activity behaviors: a pilot study. Health Place 17:1150–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.05.001
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Finnish ministry of education and culture as the primary source of funding for this research. This research is also partially funded by Finnish academy as part of PLANhealth Project (13297753). Our special thanks goes to Dr. Suzanne Mavoa and Dr. Peta Mitchel, for their valuable comments during this project. We would like to also thank Briam Amaya Perez for helping us with the graphics used in this paper, as well as all members of KLAKSU meetings for providing us with constructive feedback during the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents (N = 1139)
Appendix: Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents (N = 1139)
Sample (%) | Statistics Finland (%)* | |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 41 | 45 |
Female | 59 | 55 |
Age | ||
55–64 | 51 | 55 |
65–74 | 48 | 45 |
Retired | 60 | 59 |
Educationa | ||
Basic education | 13 | 40 |
Upper secondary education | 42 | 33 |
Lower university degree | 16 | 11 |
Higher university degree | 29 | 17 |
Marital status | ||
Married | 64 | 55 |
Unmarried | 12 | 17 |
Divorced | 17 | 23 |
Widow | 7 | 6 |
Living arrangement | ||
Couple | 68 | 60 |
Living alone | 28 | 35 |
Other | 4 | 5 |
Housing | ||
Apartment | 59 | 70 |
Row house apartment | 21 | 10 |
Detached house | 20 | 19 |
Mother tongue | ||
Finnish | 89 | 87 |
Swedish | 9 | 7 |
Other | 3 | 6 |
Income (median)b | ||
Ages 55–64 | 3501–4000 | 4001–4500 |
Ages 65–74 | 3001–3500 | 3001–3500 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hasanzadeh, K., Laatikainen, T. & Kyttä, M. A place-based model of local activity spaces: individual place exposure and characteristics. J Geogr Syst 20, 227–252 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-017-0264-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-017-0264-z