Abstract
Previous research has shown that understanding the migration habits of college graduates is important because there is evidence of a link between human capital, proxied by an educated workforce, and economic growth. While a number of papers have investigated the motivations for migration by college graduates in other countries or between US regions, few studies have examined US college graduate migration at the regional level or used individual-level data. To help understand the post-graduation location decisions of recent US college graduates, we surveyed graduates of California State University, Long Beach, a large, state-supported university in the nation’s second-largest metropolitan area. Long Beach, despite being the home to this large university, lags the region in numbers of college-educated residents. The region has also experienced substantial economic restructuring. The results suggest that amenities play a strong role in where graduates choose to locate and that cities should do more to build connections with students in order to retain their talents post-graduation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Data were pulled from the CSULB Institutional Research Web site, http://www.csulb.edu/institutional-research-assessment/beach-data/common-data-set.
Based on estimates from the 2011–2015 American Community Survey by the US Census.
Based on estimates from the 2012–2016 American Community Survey by the US Census.
IRB rules required that we make any question optional.
For example, in the 2009–2010 academic year, 8750 students graduated from CSULB. http://web.csulb.edu/divisions/students/uosr/Publications/PDF/distinctions.pdf.
Unfortunately, limited detail was available for the overall surveyed or graduate population. Thus, we had to rely on the data that were available.
While there are differences between the choices themselves, such as their distance to Long Beach, our method does control for this because for some choices, such as “the rest of California,” there are many distances depending on exactly where they live. We recognize this is a limitation of our research.
For more information on the multinomial logit approach, see Wooldridge (2010).
Marginal effects for indicator or dummy variables are based on discrete differences rather than derivatives.
References
Aamoucke R (2016) Quality of life and the geography of human capital. In: Aamoucke R (ed) Innovative start-ups and the distribution of human capital: the role of regional knowledge. Springer, Switzerland, pp 79–117
Abel JR, Deitz R (2012) Do colleges and universities increase their region’s human capital? J Econ Geogr 12(3):667–691
Abel JR, Gabe TM (2011) Human capital and economic activity in urban America. Reg Stud 45(8):1079–1090
American Mobility (2008) Who moves? Who stays put? Where’s home? A social and demographic trends report. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2011/04/American-Mobility-Report-updated-12-29-08.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2017
Becker G (1964) Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. NBER: distributed by Columbia University Press, New York
Betz M, Partridge MD, Fallah B (2016) Smart cities and attracting knowledge workers: what cities attract highly educated workers in the 21st century? Pap Reg Sci 95(4):819–841
Biagi B, Faggin A, McCann P (2011) Long and short distance migration in Italy: the role of economic, social and environmental characteristics. Spat Econ Anal 6(1):111–131
Bound J, Groen J, Kezdi G, Turner S (2004) Trade in university training: cross-state variation in the production and stock of college-educated labor. J Econom 121(1–2):143–173
Corcoran J, Faggian A, McCann P (2010) Human capital in remote and rural Australia: the role of graduate migration. Growth Change 41(2):192–210
Dotzel K (2016) Do natural amenities influence undergraduate student migration decisions? Ann Reg Sci 59(3):677–705
Evans AW (1990) The assumption of equilibrium in the analysis of migration and interregional differences: a review of some recent research. J Reg Sci 30(4):515–531
Faggian A, Franklin RS (2014) Human capital redistribution in the USA: the migration of the college-bound. Spat Econ Anal 9(4):376–395
Faggian A, McCann P (2009) Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British Regions. Camb J Econ 33(2):317–333
Faggian A, McCann P, Sheppard SC (2007) Some evidence that women are more mobile than men: gender differences in UK graduate migration behavior. J Reg Sci 47(3):517–539
Florida R (2002) The economic geography of talent. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 92(4):743–755
Florida R, Mellander C, Stolarick K (2008) Inside the black box of regional development—human capital, the creative class and tolerance. J Econ Geogr 8(5):615–649
Florida R, Mellander C, Stolarick K (2016) Human capital in cities and suburbs. Ann Reg Sci 57(1):91–123
Glaeser EL, Gottlieb JD (2006) Urban resurgence and the consumer city. Urban Stud 43(8):1275–1299
Glaeser EL, Saiz A (2004) The rise of the skilled city. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs No. 5, pp 47–94
Glaeser EL, Sheinkman JA, Schleifer A (1995) Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. J Monet Econ 36(1):117–143
Gottlieb PD, Fogarty M (2003) Educational attainment and metropolitan growth. Econ Dev Q 17(4):325–336
Gottlieb PD, Joseph G (2006) College-to-work migration of technology graduates and holders of doctorates within the United States. J Reg Sci 46(4):627–659
Graves PE, Mueser P (1993) The role of equilibrium and disequilibrium in modeling regional growth and decline: a critical reassessment. J Reg Sci 33(1):69–84
Greenlee AJ, Wilson BK (2016) Where does location affordability drive residential mobility? An analysis of origin and destination communities. Hous Policy Debate 26(4–5):583–606
Groen JA (2004) The effect of college location on migration of college-educated labor. J Econom 121(1–2):125–142
Groen JA, White MJ (2004) In-state versus out-of-state students: the divergence of interest between public universities and state governments. J Public Econ 88(9–10):1793–1814
Hammond GW, Thompson EC (2008) Determinants of income growth in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan labor markets. Am J Agric Econ 90(3):783–793
Hansen SB, Ban C, Huggins L (2003) Explaining the “brain drain” from older industrial cities: the Pittsburgh region. Econ Dev Q 17(2):132–147
Lambiri D, Biagi B, Royuela V (2007) Quality of life in the economic and urban economic literature. Soc Indic Res 84(1):1–25
Moretti E (2004) Workers’ education, spillovers, and productivity: evidence from plant-level production functions. Am Econ Rev 94(3):656–690
Partridge MD (2010) The dueling models, NEG vs. amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth. Pap Reg Sci 89(3):513–536
Partridge MD, Rickman DS (2003) The waxing and waning of US regional economies: the chicken-egg of jobs versus people. J Urban Econ 53(1):76–97
Partridge MD, Rickman DS, Olfert MR, Ali K (2012) Dwindling US internal migration: evidence of a spatial equilibrium or structural shifts in local labor markets? Reg Sci Urban Econ 42(1–2):375–388
Rappaport J (2004) Why are population flows so persistent? J Urban Econ 56(3):554–580
Rappaport J (2007) Moving to nice weather. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37(3):375–398
Rauch J (1993) Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: evidence from the cities. J Urban Econ 34(3):380–400
Roback J (1982) Wages, rents, and the quality of life. J Polit Econ 90(6):1257–1278
Simon CJ (1998) Human capital and metropolitan employment growth. J Urban Econ 43(2):223–243
Stephens HM, Partridge MD (2015) Lake amenities, environmental degradation, and great lakes regional growth. Int Reg Sci Rev 38(1):61–91
Tornatzky L, Gray D, Tarant S, Zimmer C (2001) Who will stay and who will leave? Individual, institutional, and state-level predictors of state retention of recent science and engineering graduates. Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council, Durham
Venhorst V, Van Dijk J, Van Wissen L (2011) An analysis of trends in spatial mobility of Dutch graduates. Spat Econ Anal 6(1):57–82
Whisler RL, Waldorf BS, Mulligan GF, Plane DA (2008) Quality of life and the migration of the college-educated: a life-course approach. Growth Change 39(1):58–94
Winters JV (2011) Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. J Reg Sci 51(2):253–270
Winters JV (2013) Human capital externalities and employment differences across metropolitan areas of the USA. J Econ Geogr 13(5):799–822
Winters JV (2018) Do higher college graduation rates increase local education levels? Pap Reg Sci 97(3):617–638
Withers SD (1997) Demographic polarization of housing affordability in six major United States metropolitan areas. Urban Geogr 18(4):296–323
Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge
Wozniak A (2010) Are college graduates more responsive to distant labor market opportunities? J Hum Resour 45(4):944–970
Acknowledgements
Thank you to three reviewers and participants at the North American Regional Science Council and the Southern Regional Science Association conferences and seminar participants at Jinan University, Guangzhou, PRC, for helpful comments. Special thanks go to Annette Kunitsa for her research assistance. Funding for this research was partially provided by an Early Career grant from the Regional Studies Association, and the survey was conducted while the author was at California State University, Long Beach.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1: Survey instrument
Appendix 1: Survey instrument
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stephens, H.M. Understanding US college graduate migration. J Geogr Syst 21, 509–531 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-019-00310-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-019-00310-5