Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding US college graduate migration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has shown that understanding the migration habits of college graduates is important because there is evidence of a link between human capital, proxied by an educated workforce, and economic growth. While a number of papers have investigated the motivations for migration by college graduates in other countries or between US regions, few studies have examined US college graduate migration at the regional level or used individual-level data. To help understand the post-graduation location decisions of recent US college graduates, we surveyed graduates of California State University, Long Beach, a large, state-supported university in the nation’s second-largest metropolitan area. Long Beach, despite being the home to this large university, lags the region in numbers of college-educated residents. The region has also experienced substantial economic restructuring. The results suggest that amenities play a strong role in where graduates choose to locate and that cities should do more to build connections with students in order to retain their talents post-graduation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data were pulled from the CSULB Institutional Research Web site, http://www.csulb.edu/institutional-research-assessment/beach-data/common-data-set.

  2. Based on estimates from the 2011–2015 American Community Survey by the US Census.

  3. Based on estimates from the 2012–2016 American Community Survey by the US Census.

  4. IRB rules required that we make any question optional.

  5. For example, in the 2009–2010 academic year, 8750 students graduated from CSULB. http://web.csulb.edu/divisions/students/uosr/Publications/PDF/distinctions.pdf.

  6. Unfortunately, limited detail was available for the overall surveyed or graduate population. Thus, we had to rely on the data that were available.

  7. While there are differences between the choices themselves, such as their distance to Long Beach, our method does control for this because for some choices, such as “the rest of California,” there are many distances depending on exactly where they live. We recognize this is a limitation of our research.

  8. For more information on the multinomial logit approach, see Wooldridge (2010).

  9. Marginal effects for indicator or dummy variables are based on discrete differences rather than derivatives.

References

  • Aamoucke R (2016) Quality of life and the geography of human capital. In: Aamoucke R (ed) Innovative start-ups and the distribution of human capital: the role of regional knowledge. Springer, Switzerland, pp 79–117

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Abel JR, Deitz R (2012) Do colleges and universities increase their region’s human capital? J Econ Geogr 12(3):667–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abel JR, Gabe TM (2011) Human capital and economic activity in urban America. Reg Stud 45(8):1079–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Mobility (2008) Who moves? Who stays put? Where’s home? A social and demographic trends report. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2011/04/American-Mobility-Report-updated-12-29-08.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2017

  • Becker G (1964) Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. NBER: distributed by Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz M, Partridge MD, Fallah B (2016) Smart cities and attracting knowledge workers: what cities attract highly educated workers in the 21st century? Pap Reg Sci 95(4):819–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biagi B, Faggin A, McCann P (2011) Long and short distance migration in Italy: the role of economic, social and environmental characteristics. Spat Econ Anal 6(1):111–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound J, Groen J, Kezdi G, Turner S (2004) Trade in university training: cross-state variation in the production and stock of college-educated labor. J Econom 121(1–2):143–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran J, Faggian A, McCann P (2010) Human capital in remote and rural Australia: the role of graduate migration. Growth Change 41(2):192–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotzel K (2016) Do natural amenities influence undergraduate student migration decisions? Ann Reg Sci 59(3):677–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans AW (1990) The assumption of equilibrium in the analysis of migration and interregional differences: a review of some recent research. J Reg Sci 30(4):515–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faggian A, Franklin RS (2014) Human capital redistribution in the USA: the migration of the college-bound. Spat Econ Anal 9(4):376–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faggian A, McCann P (2009) Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British Regions. Camb J Econ 33(2):317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faggian A, McCann P, Sheppard SC (2007) Some evidence that women are more mobile than men: gender differences in UK graduate migration behavior. J Reg Sci 47(3):517–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2002) The economic geography of talent. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 92(4):743–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R, Mellander C, Stolarick K (2008) Inside the black box of regional development—human capital, the creative class and tolerance. J Econ Geogr 8(5):615–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R, Mellander C, Stolarick K (2016) Human capital in cities and suburbs. Ann Reg Sci 57(1):91–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL, Gottlieb JD (2006) Urban resurgence and the consumer city. Urban Stud 43(8):1275–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL, Saiz A (2004) The rise of the skilled city. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs No. 5, pp 47–94

  • Glaeser EL, Sheinkman JA, Schleifer A (1995) Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. J Monet Econ 36(1):117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb PD, Fogarty M (2003) Educational attainment and metropolitan growth. Econ Dev Q 17(4):325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb PD, Joseph G (2006) College-to-work migration of technology graduates and holders of doctorates within the United States. J Reg Sci 46(4):627–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves PE, Mueser P (1993) The role of equilibrium and disequilibrium in modeling regional growth and decline: a critical reassessment. J Reg Sci 33(1):69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlee AJ, Wilson BK (2016) Where does location affordability drive residential mobility? An analysis of origin and destination communities. Hous Policy Debate 26(4–5):583–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groen JA (2004) The effect of college location on migration of college-educated labor. J Econom 121(1–2):125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groen JA, White MJ (2004) In-state versus out-of-state students: the divergence of interest between public universities and state governments. J Public Econ 88(9–10):1793–1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond GW, Thompson EC (2008) Determinants of income growth in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan labor markets. Am J Agric Econ 90(3):783–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen SB, Ban C, Huggins L (2003) Explaining the “brain drain” from older industrial cities: the Pittsburgh region. Econ Dev Q 17(2):132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambiri D, Biagi B, Royuela V (2007) Quality of life in the economic and urban economic literature. Soc Indic Res 84(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti E (2004) Workers’ education, spillovers, and productivity: evidence from plant-level production functions. Am Econ Rev 94(3):656–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge MD (2010) The dueling models, NEG vs. amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth. Pap Reg Sci 89(3):513–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge MD, Rickman DS (2003) The waxing and waning of US regional economies: the chicken-egg of jobs versus people. J Urban Econ 53(1):76–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge MD, Rickman DS, Olfert MR, Ali K (2012) Dwindling US internal migration: evidence of a spatial equilibrium or structural shifts in local labor markets? Reg Sci Urban Econ 42(1–2):375–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport J (2004) Why are population flows so persistent? J Urban Econ 56(3):554–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport J (2007) Moving to nice weather. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37(3):375–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch J (1993) Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: evidence from the cities. J Urban Econ 34(3):380–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roback J (1982) Wages, rents, and the quality of life. J Polit Econ 90(6):1257–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon CJ (1998) Human capital and metropolitan employment growth. J Urban Econ 43(2):223–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens HM, Partridge MD (2015) Lake amenities, environmental degradation, and great lakes regional growth. Int Reg Sci Rev 38(1):61–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky L, Gray D, Tarant S, Zimmer C (2001) Who will stay and who will leave? Individual, institutional, and state-level predictors of state retention of recent science and engineering graduates. Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Venhorst V, Van Dijk J, Van Wissen L (2011) An analysis of trends in spatial mobility of Dutch graduates. Spat Econ Anal 6(1):57–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisler RL, Waldorf BS, Mulligan GF, Plane DA (2008) Quality of life and the migration of the college-educated: a life-course approach. Growth Change 39(1):58–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters JV (2011) Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. J Reg Sci 51(2):253–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters JV (2013) Human capital externalities and employment differences across metropolitan areas of the USA. J Econ Geogr 13(5):799–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters JV (2018) Do higher college graduation rates increase local education levels? Pap Reg Sci 97(3):617–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withers SD (1997) Demographic polarization of housing affordability in six major United States metropolitan areas. Urban Geogr 18(4):296–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak A (2010) Are college graduates more responsive to distant labor market opportunities? J Hum Resour 45(4):944–970

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to three reviewers and participants at the North American Regional Science Council and the Southern Regional Science Association conferences and seminar participants at Jinan University, Guangzhou, PRC, for helpful comments. Special thanks go to Annette Kunitsa for her research assistance. Funding for this research was partially provided by an Early Career grant from the Regional Studies Association, and the survey was conducted while the author was at California State University, Long Beach.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather M. Stephens.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Survey instrument

Appendix 1: Survey instrument

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d
figure e
figure f

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stephens, H.M. Understanding US college graduate migration. J Geogr Syst 21, 509–531 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-019-00310-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-019-00310-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation