Abstract
This paper reviews some of the research on the use and consumption of technology in the domestic space that may not be familiar to members of the usability and design community, especially those traditionally focused on design for the workplace. The paper also introduces original research findings and conclusions from a qualitative study of the adoption and use of new ICTs conducted in a number of households and workplaces in the late 1990s, a time when many new ICT products and services were becoming available, and more traditional media and communication products were becoming widespread in homes. The paper does not make recommendations about the type of products and services to be developed, nor those that may be successful, although it is quite possible to draw this type of conclusion from it. Instead it looks at some rather broader trends in the way that we engage with technologies, rejecting and adopting them, and the importance of our domestic space and social networks to the way we will engage with future technologies aimed at the home space.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
e.g. Weillenmann and Larsson (2002) investigate the sharing and social use of mobile phone, reflecting a strong general theme found in my research of a range of ICTs.
Nippert-Eng (1995) identifies three types of workplace: one with fixed boundaries, the greedy employer, and the discretionary workplace, which leaves it up to the employee to decide their own boundaries.
Many companies have recognised this and provide their employees with computers to use at home. This is not only to give them the facilities to work at home, but also to give them the opportunity to learn at home, by using the machines for personal, family and community activities. Some would say this avoids having to provide time for learning during working hours, but many would say it was a fair exchange given the costs of computer equipment. It is also a way of extending the useful life of otherwise redundant computers.
Hannah Arendt (1958) suggested that quotidian artefacts serve to stabilise human life: they provide practical and symbolic supports and continuity to our lives. Others have the same approach. Silverstone (1994) uses the concept of 'ontological security' as he argues for television as a support and reference point for our self-identity and our relationship with the rest of the world. The psychologists Csikszentmihayli and Rochberg-Halton (1981) suggest domestic objects are used in formation of our self-identity, particularly for emphasising integration or separation from the social context. Taking this further, Hickman (1988) investigates what he calls the 'Phenomenology of quotidian artefact', to show how people use technologies for self-stabilisation. He suggests five roles for technologies: Personation – technologies allow us to play at being ourselves; Authentication – they help define who we are ; Distraction – from obligations, unpleasantness; they are the Focus of Desire; and appear to be Magic – something we do not quite understand, but enchants us. An example of expressive relationships with technology is the motorcar (Lamvik 1996): we can have a very personal, intimate, existential relationship with the car itself.
Technologies are necessary – they become essential parts of everyday life, e.g. (washing machine) female. The necessity is interpreted differently by different family members, which reveals their concerns and priorities, etc.
They allow control over things, time and other people. For example, the housewife's control over domestic lives and children. There is also the example of relinquishing control to get out of responsibility for doing it. Men also express a strong controlling wish to 'control nature' or their family
They are functional. This can be interpreted in two ways. For some, generally male, there is an interest in the intrinsic functions of technologies. For others, a more female attitude, it is the utility of the technology as a tool, rather than its complete and often unusable functionality
Technologies allow sociality and privacy – ICTs facilitate social contact with the outside world. We talk to each other on the telephone and watch the world on TV. Social contact appears to be more important for women, especially the telephone. In reverse it allows people to keep the privacy of their own home or their own room, such as teenagers reinforcing home boundaries by playing their own music in their own room music. More recent research by Gournay and Mercier (Gournay and Mercier 1998) on this issue highlights the way people use the telephone in different ways, depending on their job and their life stage.
We normally have to 'retro-fit' new technologies into the physical and social spaces of the home, but history tells us that if the technology is attractive and useful enough we are willing to make radical changes, such as the installation of electric circuits or gas pipes.
Mick and Fournier conducted a series of in-depth studies of the paradoxes of using and owning ICTs (Mick and Fournier 1998) and found a range of coping strategies.
This is discussed in Bauer (1995), who compares it with resistance to nuclear power and weapons, to computerisation in the 1970s, and genetic technologies today.
References
Akrich M (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 205–224
Ang I (1991) Desperately seeking the audience. Routledge, London
Arendt H (1958) The human condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Aune M (1996) The computer in everyday life: patterns of domestication of a new technology. In: Lie M, Sørensen KH (eds) Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo
Bauer M (ed) (1995) Resistance to new technology: nuclear power, information technology and bio-technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Belk RW (1988) Possessions and the extended self. J Consumer Res 15(September):129–168
Belk RW (1995) Studies in the new consumer behaviour. In: Miller D (ed) Acknowledging consumption. Routledge, London
Berg A-J (1996) Digital feminism. Senter for teknologi og samfunn, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitiet, Trondheim, p 189
Bijker WE, Law J (eds) (1992) Shaping technology building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Inside Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Bijker W, Hughes TP et al (eds) (1987) The social construction of technological systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Brosnan M (1998) Technophobia. Routledge, London
Campbell C (1995) The sociology of consumption. In: Miller D (ed) Acknowledging consumption. Routledge, London
Carey J, Elton M (1996) Forecasting demand for new consumer services: challenges and alternatives. In: Dholakia RR, Nundorf N, Dholakia N (eds) New infotainment technologies in the home. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 35–57
Clerc P-F, Mallein P (1998) CAUTIC. IREST/ADERA/France Telecom, Bordeaux
Cohen C (ed) (1987) Social change and the life course. Tavistock, London
Cowan RS (1987) The consumption junction: a proposal for research strategies in the sociology of technology. In: Bijker W, Hughes TP, Pinch T (eds). The social construction of technological systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Csikszentmihayli M, Rochberg-Halton E (1981) The meaning of things. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Dholakia RR, Mundorf N et al (1996a) Bringing infotainment home: challenges and choices. In: Dholakia RR, Mundorf N, Dholakia N. New infotainment technologies in the home, demand side perspectives. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
Dholakia RR, Mundorf N, et al (eds) (1996b) New infotainment technologies in the home, demand side perspectives. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
Douglas M (1996) Thought styles: critical essays on good taste. Sage, London
Dunphy S, Herbig PA (1995) Acceptance of Innovations: the customer is the key. J High Technol Manage 6(2):193–209
Fournier S (1991) Meaning-based framework for the study of consumer–object relations. Adv Consumer Res 18:736–742
Fournier S (1998) Consumer resistance: societal motivations, consumer manifestations, and implications in the marketing domain: ACR special session summary. Adv Consumer Res 25:88–90
Fournier S, Deighton J (1999) Assimilating innovations. Association of Consumer Researchers, Columbus, OH
Gay Pd, Hall S et al (1997) Doing cultural studies: the story of the Sony Walkman. Sage, London
Gournay Cd, Mercier PA (1998) Entre la vie privée et le travail: décloisonnement et nouveaux partages. Penser des Usages. IREST/ADERA/France Telecom, Bordeaux
Hickman L (1988) The phenomenology of the quotidian artifact. In: Durbin P (ed) Technology and contemporary life, vol 4. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 161–176
Hirschman E (1980) Innovativeness, novelty seeking and consumer creativity. J Consumer Res 7(December):283–295
Holt DB (1995) How consumers consumer: a typology of consumption practices. J Consumer Res 22(June):1–16
Lamvik G (1996) A fairy tale on wheels: The car as a vehicle for meaning within Norwegian subculture. In: Lie M, Sørensen KH (eds) (1997) Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo
Lawrence PR (1954) How to overcome resistance to change. Harvard Business Rev 32(3):49–57
Lie M, Sørensen KH (eds) (1997) Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo
Livingstone S (1992) The meaning of domestic technologies. In: Silverstone R, Hirsch E (eds) Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces. Routledge, London
Livingstone S, Bovill M (1999) Children, young people and the changing media environment. London School of Economics and Political Science, London
Lull J (1990) Inside family viewing : ethnographic research on television audiences. Routledge, London
MacKenzie D, Wajcman J (eds) (1985) The social shaping of technology: how the refrigerator got its hum. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK
McCracken G (1988) Culture and consumption: new approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN
Mick DG, Fournier S (1995) Technological consumer products in everyday life: ownership meaning and satisfaction. Marketing Science Institute
Mick DG, Fournier S (1998) Paradox of technology: consumer cognizance, emotions and coping strategies. J Consumer Res 25(September):123–143
Miles I, Thomas G (1996) User resistance to new interactive media: participants, processes and paradigms. In: Bauer M (ed) Resistance to new technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Miller D (ed) (1995) Acknowledging consumption: a review of new studies. Material cultures. Routledge, London
Moores S (1995) Interpreting audiences: the ethnography of media consumption. Sage, London
Morley D (1986) Family television: cultural power and domestic leisure. Comedia, London
Morley D (1992) Television, audiences and cultural studies. Routledge, London
Nippert-Eng CE (1995) Home and work. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Sheth JN (1981) Psychology of innovation resistance. Res Marketing 4: 273–282
Silverstone R (1994) Television and everyday life. Routledge, London
Silverstone R, Hartman M (1998) Methodologies for media and information technology research in everyday life. EMTEL working paper no 5. CULCOM, University of Sussex, Brighton
Silverstone R, Hirsch E (eds) (1992) Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces. Routledge, London
Silverstone R, Hirsch E et al (1992) Information and communications technologies and the moral economy of the household. In: Silverstone R, Hirsch E (eds) Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces. Routledge, London
Stern BB (1998) Representing consumers: voices, views, and visions. Routledge, London
Stevens R, Warren W et al (1989). Non adopters of automatic teller machines. Akron Business Econ Rev 20(3):55–63
Stewart J (2000) Cafematics: the cybercafe and the community. Community Inform. Idea Group. Gurstein, Toronto
Stewart J (2002) Encounters with the information society: personal and social issues in the appropriation of new media products in everyday life: adoption, non-adoption, and the role of the informal economy and local experts. Research Centre for Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Szmigin I, Foxall G (1998) Three forms of innovation resistance: the case of retail payment methods. Technovation 18(6–7):459–468
Venkatesh A (1996) Computers and other interactive technologies for the home. Commun ACM 39(12):47–54
Venkatesh A, Vitalari N (1992) An emerging distributed work arrangement: an investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Manage Sci 38(12):1687–1705
Wallendorf M, Arnould E (1988) My favorite things: a cross-cultural inquiry into object attachment, possessiveness, and social linkage. J Consumer R 14(March):531–547
Wilkes RE (1995) Household life-cycle stages, transitions and product experiences. J Consumer Res 22(June):27–42
Williams R, Edge D (1996) The social shaping of technology. Res Policy 25:856–899
Woolgar S (1991) Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. In: Law J (ed) A sociology of monsters. Routledge, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart, J. The social consumption of information and communication technologies (ICTs): insights from research on the appropriation and consumption of new ICTs in the domestic environment. Cogn Tech Work 5, 4–14 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-002-0111-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-002-0111-x