Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic intuition in military command and control: why it is important, and how it should be developed

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers combat dynamic intuition (CDI). We define CDI as the cognitive capability possessed by a military commander when conducting operations. The paper serves two purposes: firstly, we briefly review the previous research on decision making and learning in dynamic systems, in order to discuss the role of microworlds as training environments to improve CDI. In particular, we focus on the advantages of applying system dynamics techniques when designing microworlds to represent "real world" operational challenges. Secondly, we draw implications from a microworld-based experiment, where task complexity is the manipulated variable. The results indicate that environment simplification in itself is not enough to enhance learning in a microworld setting—a conscious pedagogical program, aimed at increasing the training intensity, should also be developed in support of such training. The latter suggestion should be considered an opportunity for further research on CDI improvement.Footnote 1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A substantial portion of this work was conducted while the first author was employed at the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (NDRE).

  2. According to Brehmer (2002) expert decision makers are recognised by their capability to adapt their work strategies to control their work load.

  3. Note that an alternate interpretation of the experiment is as an investigation of the extent to which experience with dynamic control tasks involving individual systems would be transferable to tasks requiring coordination of the respective systems. Would coordination performance be enhanced by providing subjects with practice on the separate control tasks, prior to engaging in the coordination task?

  4. The model was implemented in ithink Analyst system dynamics modelling software (version 6.0 for Windows)

  5. Half of the decisions need to be made for each of the sub-models as compared to the full model.

References

  • Bakken BE (1989) Learning in dynamic simulation games: using performance as a measure. In: Millin PM, Zahn EOK (eds) Computer-based management of complex systems: Proceedings of the 1989 International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Springer, Stuttgart

  • Bakken BE et al. (1992) Experimentation in learning organizations: a management flight simulator approach. Europ J Oper Res 59:167–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakken BE (1993) Learning and transfer of understanding in dynamic decision environments. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Bakken BT et al. (2001) An experiment on minimalist decision training (technical report—forthcoming). Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI), Kjeller, Norway

  • Bakken BT, Gilljam M (2001) Combat dynamic intuition (CDI): what is it, and how can it be improved? In: Cañas J et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Cognitive Research with Microworlds (CRWM-2001), Granada, Spain,12–14 November, 2001

  • Brehmer B (1987) Systems design and the psychology of complex systems. In: Rasmussen J, Zunde P (eds) Empirical foundations of information and software science, Plenum, New York

  • Brehmer B (1988) Strategies in real time dynamic decision making. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

  • Brehmer B (1995) Feedback delays in complex dynamic decision tasks. In: French PA, Funke J (eds) Complex problem solving: the European perspective, Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

  • Brehmer B (2000) Dynamic decision making in command and control. In: McCann and Pigeau (eds) The human in command: exploring the modern military experience. Kluwer, New York

  • Brehmer B (2002) Learning to control a dynamic system. Unpublished manuscript, Swedish National Defence College, Stockholm

  • Brehmer B, Allard R (1991) Dynamic decision making: effects of complexity and feedback delays. In: Rasmussen J et al. (eds) Distributed decision making: cognitive models of cooperative work, Wiley, Chichester, UK

  • Brehmer B, Dörner D (1993) Experiments with computer simulated microworlds: escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study. Comp Hum Behav 9:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner T (1999) Modelling learning in economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

  • Broadbent DE et al. (1986) Implicit and explicit knowledge in the control of complex systems. Brit J Psychol 77:33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik E (1956) Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

  • Dienes Z, Fahey R (1995) Roles of specific instances in controlling a dynamic system. J Exper Psychol 21:848–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes Z, Fahey R (1998) The role of implicit memory in controlling a dynamic system. Quart J Exper Psychol 51a: 593–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner D (1980) On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity. Simul Game 11:87–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunwoody PT et al. (2000) Cognitive adaptation and its consequences: a test of cognitive continuum theory. J Behav Dec Mak 13:35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM (1978) Confidence in judgement: persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychol Rev 85:395–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friman H, Brehmer B (1999) Using microworlds to study intuitive battle dynamics: a concept for the future. In: Proceedings of the Command & Control Research Symposium, US Naval War College, Newport, Rhode Island, 29 June–1 July, 1999

  • Fuglseth AM (1989) Beslutningsstøtte: metode for diagnose av lederes informasjons- og situasjonsoppfatninger. Dissertation, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH)

  • Fuglseth AM, Grønhaug K (1995) Task characteristics and expertise. In: Kaufmann G et al. (eds) Problem solving and cognitive processes, Fagbokforlaget, Bergen, Norway

  • Hammond KR (1996) Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs W, Senge PM (1992) Overcoming limits to learning in computer-based learning environments. Europ J Oper Res 59:183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel JH, Roth AE (1995) Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

  • Kleinmuntz DN, Thomas JB (1987) The value of action and inference in dynamic decisionmaking. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 39:341–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintern G (1991) Instructional strategies. In: Morrison JE (ed) Training for performance: principles of applied human learning, Wiley, Chichester, UK

  • Moxnes E (1998) Not only the tragedy of the commons: misperceptions of bioeconomics. Manage Sci 44:1234–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  • Newell KM et al. (1989) Whole-part training strategies for learning the response dynamics of microprocessor driven simulators. Acta Psychologica 71:197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paich M, Sterman JD (1993) Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets. Manage Sci 39:1439–1458

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck AC, Detweiler MC (2000) Training concurrent multistep procedural tasks. Hum Fact 42:379–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon G et al. (1991) Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerized writing partner. J Educ 28:373–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt JF (1996) How we decide. In: Designing TDGS—a tactical decision games workbook. U. S. Marine Corps University Press

  • Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline (Norwegian edtiton). Hjemmets bokforlag as, Oslo

  • Simon HA (1956) Administrative behavior. Wiley, New York

  • Simon HA (1977) The new science of management decision. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  • Simon HA (1978) Rationality as a process and product of thought. Amer Econ Rev 68:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Manage Sci 35:321–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeny LB, Sterman JD (2000) Bathtub dynamics: preliminary results of a systems thinking inventory. In: Proceedings of the 2000 International System Dynamics Conference, Bergen, Norway, 6–10 August, 2000

  • Tversky D, Kahneman D (1987) Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In: Hogarth RM, Reder MW (eds) Rational choice: the contrast between economics and psychology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bjørn Tallak Bakken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bakken, B.T., Gilljam, M. Dynamic intuition in military command and control: why it is important, and how it should be developed. Cogn Tech Work 5, 197–205 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-003-0123-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-003-0123-1

Keywords

Navigation