Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decision making by on-scene incident commanders in nuclear emergencies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study is reported into the cognitive structures that support incident command decision making by the on-scene incident commander in a nuclear emergency response organisation. These cognitive structures assist incident commanders to assess the situation and make decisions. A card-sorting task was conducted with nuclear on-scene incident commanders (OICs) (n=14) and identified that decision making was influenced by four main factors: availability of procedures; uncertainty; typicality of the decision; and advice from others. The results are discussed in relation to findings from other domains, e.g., emergency services and aviation, and emphasise the importance of considering the specific characteristics of the environment in which the emergency occurs. The findings can be used to determine objectives for directed decision making training for OICs on nuclear installations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbuthnot A (2002) Key issues in incident command. In: Flin R, Arbuthnot A (eds) Incident command: tales from the hot seat. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 10–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckstead JW (2002) Using hierarchical cluster analysis in nursing research. Western J Nursing Res 4(3):307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office (2003) Dealing with disaster, 3rd edn. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Channel Tunnel Safety Authority (1997) Inquiry into the fire on heavy goods vehicle shuttle 7539 on 18 November 1996. CTSA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MS, Freeman JT, Thompson BB (1997) Training the naturalistic decision maker. In: Zsambok C, Klein G (eds) Naturalistic decision making. LEA, Mahwah, pp 257–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MS, Freeman JT, Wolf S (1996) Metarecognition in time-stressed decision making: Recognising, critiquing and correcting. Hum Factors 38:206–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke NJ (1994) Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. Intl J Hum Comput Stud 41:801–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton M, Flin R (2002) Command decision making. In: Flin R, Arbuthnot K (eds) Incident command. Tales from the hot seat. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 201–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton M, Flin R (2004) Identifying and training non-technical skills of nuclear emergency response teams. Ann Nucl Energy 31(12):1317–1330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton M, Flin R, Rattray WA (2000) Training decision makers—tactical decision games. J Contingencies Crisis Manage 8(4):208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas HM, Fiore SM, Bowers C, Salas E (2004) Fostering constructive cognitive and metacognitive activity in computer-based complex task training environments. Comput Hum Behav 20(2):225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis C (ed) (1989) Expert knowledge and explanation: the knowledge-language interface. Ellis Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallesen J (2000) Developing practical thinking for battle command. In: McCann C, Pigeau R (eds) The human in command: Exploring the modern military experience. Kluwer/Plenum, New York, pp 185–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore SM, Cuevas HM, Oser R (2003) A picture is worth a thousand connections: the facilitative effects of diagrams on mental model development and task performance. Comput Hum Behav 19:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer U, Orasanu J, Wich M (1995) Expert pilots’ perception of problem situations. In: Paper presented at the 8th international symposium on aviation psychology, Columbus, Ohio, 24–28 April 1995

  • Flin R (1996) Sitting in the hot seat: Leaders and teams for critical incident management. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Flin R (2001) Decision making and leadership in crises: the piper alpha disaster. In: Rosenthal W, Comfort L, Boin A (eds) Managing crises. CC Thomas, Springfield, pp 103–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Flin R, Arbuthnot A (2002) Lessons from the hot seat. In: Flin R, Arbuthnot A (eds) Incident command: Tales from the hot seat. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Flin R, Slaven G (1995) Identifying the right stuff: selection and training of on-scene emergency commanders. J Contingencies Crisis Manage 3(2):113–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredholm L (1997) Decision making patterns in major fire-fighting and rescue operations. In: Flin R, Salas E, Strub M, Martin L (eds) Decision making under stress: emerging themes and applications. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser R (1989) Expertise in learning: how do we think about instructional processes now that we have discovered knowledge structure?. In: Klahr D, Kotofsky D (eds) Complex information processing: the impact of Herbert A Simon. LEA, Hillsdale, pp 269–282

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE (1991) Windscale vitrification shield door incident. HMSO, London, 15 September 1991

  • HSE (1992) A guide to the offshore installation (safety case) regulation. HSE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE (1994) The management of health and safety at atomic weapons establishments premises, vols. 1 and 2. HSE, Sudbury

  • Johnson-Laird P (1983) Mental models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G (1997) Training incident command. Paper presented at the incident command conference, University of Portsmouth, Centre for Public Sector Management

  • Klein G (1998) Sources of power. How people make decisions. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G, Calderwood R, Clinton-Cirocco A (1986) Rapid decision making on the fire ground. In: Paper presented at the human factors society 30th annual meeting, 1, San Diego, CA

  • Klein GA (1989) Recognition-primed decisions. In: Rouse W (ed) Advances in man–machine systems research. JAI, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (1993) Decision making in action: Models and methods. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal JB, Wish M (1978) Multidimensional scaling. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz R, Strauss O (1997) Coping with uncertainty: a naturalistic decision making analysis. Organ Behav Hum Dec Processes 69(2):149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon KR, Wehrung DA (1986) Taking risks. Free, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann C, Pigeau R (eds) (2000) The human in command: Exploring the modern military experience. Kluwer/Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore T (2002) Police commander—the Notting Hill riot. In: Flin R, Arbuthnot A (eds) Incident command: tales from the hot seat. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 69–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols PD, Chipman SF, Brennan RL (eds) (1995) Cognitively diagnostic assessment. LEA, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Niessen C, Eyferth K, Bierwagens T (1999) Modelling cognitive processes of experienced air traffic controllers. Ergonomics 42(11):1507–1520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu J, Connolly T (1993) The reinvention of decision making. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu J, Fischer U (1997) Finding decisions in natural environments: The view from the cockpit. In: Zsambok C, Klein G (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 343–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu JM (1993) Decision making in the cockpit. In: Wiener EL, Kanki BG, Helmreich RL (eds) Cockpit resource management. Academic, New York, pp 137–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual R, Henderson S (1997) Evidence of naturalistic decision making in command and control. In: Zsambok CE, Klein GA (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigeau R, McCann C (2000) Redefining command and control. In: McCann C, Pigeau R (eds) The human in command. Exploring the modern military experience. Kluwer/Plenum, New York, pp 163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch E, Lloyd BB (1978) Cognition and categorisation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillside

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugg G, McGeorge P (1997) The sorting techniques: A tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts. Expert Syst 14(2):80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seamster TL, Redding RE, Kaempf GL (1997) Applied cognitive task analysis in aviation. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadbolt N, Burton M (1990) Knowledge elicitation. In: Wilson JR, Corlett EN (eds) Evaluation of human work. A practical ergonomics methodology. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 321–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Skriver J, Flin R (1996) Decision making in offshore emergencies: are standard operating procedures the solution? In: Paper presented at the SPE international conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas industry, New Orleans, Louisiana

  • Stokes AF, Kemper K, Kite K (1997) Aeronautical decision making, cue recognition, and expertise under time pressure. In: Zsambok CE, Klein G (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane Y, Young FW, Leeuw D (1977) Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: an alternating squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika 42:7–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Three Mile Island Special Inquiry Group, NRC (1980) Human factors evaluation of control room design and operator performance at three mile island-2, vol 1 (final report). US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Washington, DC

  • USNRC, UNRC (1987) Report on the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station (NUREG-1250). US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

  • Zsambok CE, Klein G (eds) (1997) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the UK Nuclear Industry Management Committee (Project: HF/GNSR 5007). The views presented here are those of the authors and should not be taken to represent the position or policy of the organisations involved. We thank the external monitors for this project, and other staff who provided co-operation and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, King’s College, University of AberdeenKing’s College, Aberdeen, AB24 2UB, UK

    M. T. Crichton, R. Flin & P. McGeorge

Authors
  1. M. T. Crichton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Flin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. McGeorge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. T. Crichton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crichton, M.T., Flin, R. & McGeorge, P. Decision making by on-scene incident commanders in nuclear emergencies. Cogn Tech Work 7, 156–166 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0183-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0183-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation