Skip to main content
Log in

A method for measuring work interference in surgical teams

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To enhance surgical systems we need to manage the performance of the teams that comprise them. To do this we must measure the properties and processes of teams and account for the demands and conditions of their work. Recent research shows that observation is a potentially valuable method of measurement, but its potential application in surgery remains unclear. In this study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, an observer applied observational measures of teamwork in the operating theatre and recorded intra-operative interference from observed distraction and interruption. Results showed that it was feasible to observe a broad scope of teamwork and to reveal the frequency and source of work interference. However, the measures were necessarily selective and so limited in their analysis of the conditions and events that might interfere with the collective work in surgery. Such measures may however prove useful when applied in conjunction with other methods of measurement and utilised as performance feedback data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brannick M, Roach M, Salas E (1993) Understanding team performance: a multimethod study. Hum Perf 6(4):287–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calland J, Guerlain S, Adams R, Tribble C, Foley E, Chekan E (2002) A systems approach to surgical safety. Surg Endosc 16:1005–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carthey J, de Leval MR, Reason JT (2001) The human factor in cardiac surgery: errors and near misses in a high technology medical domain. Ann Thoracic Surg 72:300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole KR, Giddings AE, de Leval MR, Peek GJ, Godden PJ, Utley M, Gallivan S, Hirst G, Dale T (2006) Identification of systems failures in successful paediatric cardiac surgery. Ergonomics 49(5–6):567–588 (special issue on patient safety)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH (2000) Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians ‘interrupt-driven’ and ‘multitasking’? Acad Emerg Med 7(11):1239–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leval M, Carthey J, Wright D, Farewell V, Reason J (2000) Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicentre study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:661–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson TL, McIntyre RM (1997) A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (eds) Team performance assessment and measurement: theory, methods, and applications. Series in applied psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Etchells E, O’Neil C, Bernstein M (2003) Patient safety in surgery: error detection and prevention. World J Surg 27:936–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote G, Zala-Mezö E, Grommes P (2004) The effects of different forms of coordination on coping with workload. In: Dietrich R, Childress TM (eds) Group interaction in high-risk environments. Ashgate, pp 39–55

  • Hazelhurst B, Mcmullen C, Gorman P (2004) Getting the right tools for the job; distributed planning in cardiac surgery. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 34:708–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey AN, Vincent CA (2007) The systems of surgery. Theoretical issues in ergonomic science. doi:10.1080/14639220701193314 (in press)

  • Healey MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM, Rogers FB, Burns E (2002) Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg 137(5):611–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey AN, Undre S, Vincent CA (2004) Developing observational measures of performance in surgical teams. Qual Saf Health Care 13(Suppl 1):i33–i40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2006a) Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49(5–6):589–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey AN, Undre S, Vincent CA (2006b) Defining the technical skills of teamwork in surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 15:231–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey AN, Primus CP, Koutantji M (2007) Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 16:135–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL (2000) On error management: lessons from aviation. Br Med J 320:781–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Regehr G, Baker GR, Reznick R, Bohnen J, Orser B, Doran D, Grober E (2004) Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care 13:330–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss J, Xiao Y (2004) Improving operating room coordination: communication pattern assessment. J Nurs Adm 34(2):93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth EM, Christian CK, Gustafson M, Sheridan TB, Dwyer K, Gandhi TK, Zinner MJ, Dierks MM (2004) Using field observations as a tool for discovery: analysing cognitive and collaborative demands in the operating room. Cognit Technol Work 6:148–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasou K, Reason J (1999) Team errors: definition and taxonomy. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 65:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL (2000) Error, stress and teamworking in aviation and medicine. BMJ 320:745–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Helmreich RL (2004) Translating teamwork behaviours from aviation to healthcare: development of behavioural markers for neonatal resuscitation. Qual Saf Health Care 13:i57–i64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Undre S, Healey AN, Darzi A, Vincent CA (2006) Observational teamwork assessment in surgery: a feasibility study. World J Surg 30(10):1774–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Darzi A, Vincent C (2007) The observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS): refinement and application in urological surgery. World J Surg. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9053-z

  • Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker SK, Chang A, Darzi AW (2004) Systems approach to surgical quality and safety: from concepts to measurements. Ann Surg 239(4):475–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinger MB, Englund CE (1990) Ergonomic and human factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and monitoring performance in the operating room environment. Anesthesiology 73:995–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel CM, Kneebone RL, Woloshynowych M, Nestel D, Moorthy K, Kidd J, Darzi A (2006) The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg 191(1):5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA, Salas E (2005) Promoting health care safety through training reliability teams. Qual Saf Health Care 14:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Milgram P, Doyle DJ (1997) Planning behavior and its functional roles in the interaction with complex systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 27(3):313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council UK and The BUPA Foundation UK

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Healey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Healey, A.N., Olsen, S., Davis, R. et al. A method for measuring work interference in surgical teams. Cogn Tech Work 10, 305–312 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0088-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0088-6

Keywords

Navigation