Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Scenario-based requirements capture for human factors integration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scenarios have been used by many engineering disciplines to assist the quality of their professional application to systems throughout a system life-cycle. At early phases of the system life-cycle, Systems and Software Engineers have adopted the Use Case as a means of representing system requirements through the address of user functions. Furthermore, usability engineers also use scenarios as a means of promoting better usability of systems throughout the system life-cycle. Moreover, all practitioners of the mentioned disciplines use some form of requirements capture and trace throughout the system life-cycle. However, in general Human Factors (HF) and Human Factors Integration (HFI) practitioners do not. This paper examines the efficacy of the multi disciplinary use of scenarios to assist the capture of HFI and system requirements. Such an approach benefits the early establishment of requirements and thus supports system life-cycle trace and matching of both physical and cognitive functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1989) From data to wisdom. J Appl Syst Anal 16:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams MJ, Tenney YJ, Pew RW (1991) SOAR: strategic workload and the cognitive management of advanced multi-task systems, CSERIAC, OH

  • Alexander IF, Maiden N (2004) Scenarios, stories, use cases through the systems development life-cycle. Wiley, New York

  • Bartlett FC (1958) Thinking. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boy GA (1997) Active design documents. In: DIS’97 Proceedings—designing interactive systems ACM conference, Amsterdam, NL—19–21 August. ACM Press, New York

  • Carroll JM (1999) Five reasons for scenario based design. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii

  • D/JDCC/2/6/1, 19 Feb 03, The Provenance, Authority and Coherence of Concepts, MoD Joint Doctrine and Concepts Centre

  • DoDAF (Department of Defence Architectural Framework), (2004), Handbook, vol V1. May

  • Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (2003) The hedgehog, the fox, and the magister’s pox: mending the gap between science and the humanities. Jonathan Cape, London p 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayakawa SI, Hayakawa AR (1990) Language in thought and action, 5th edn. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod IS, McClumpha (1995) An engineering psychology approach to conceptual design, contemporary ergonomics 1995, Taylor and Francis, London

  • MacLeod IS (1998) Information and advice: considerations on their forms and differences in future aircraft systems, invited keynote at Capetown global ergonomics conference. In: Scott PA, Bridger RS, Charteris (eds) Global ergonomics. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 667–672

  • MacLeod IS (2004) HF verification and validation (V&V). In: Harvey R, Sandom C (eds) HF for Engineers, Chap 12. IEE Press, London

  • MacLeod IS, Hone G, Smith S (2005) Capturing cognitive task activities for decision making and analysis. In: Proceedings of no 10 ICCRTS, Washington, June

  • Ministry of Defence Architectural Framework (MODAF), http://www.telelogic.com/corp/standards/modaf.cfm

  • Neisser U (1976) Cognition and reality: principles and implications of cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oborne DJ (1987) Ergonomics at work, 2nd edn. Wiley, Bath

  • Robertson S (2004) Scenarios in requirements discovery. In: Alexander IF, Maiden N (eds) Scenarios, stories, use cases through the systems development life-cycle, Chap 3. Wiley, London

  • Rolland C, Ben Achour C, Cauvet C, Ralyte J, Sutcliffe A, Maiden NAM, Jarke M, Haumer P, Dubois E, Heymans P (1998) A proposal for a scenario classification framework. Req Eng J 3(1):23–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shank R (1995) Tell me a story: narrative and intelligence. Northwestern University Press, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

  • Volta G (1985) Time and decision. In: Hollnagel E, Mancini G, Woods DD (eds) Intelligent decision support in process environments. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The part funding of this work as initiated by the Research Director CBD/Human Sciences, under the auspices of the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) Human Factors Integration (HFI) Defence Technology Centre (DTC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Independent Consultant, Dorset, UK

    Iain S. MacLeod

Authors
  1. Iain S. MacLeod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iain S. MacLeod.

Additional information

Any views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of MOD or any other UK government department.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacLeod, I.S. Scenario-based requirements capture for human factors integration. Cogn Tech Work 10, 191–198 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0099-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0099-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation