Skip to main content
Log in

Demands on cognitive processing: implications for verbalisation in complex work environments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Verbalisation (or talk-aloud protocols) has been used as a technique for knowledge elicitation in research for some time. It allows the researcher some degree of access to the reasoning behind participants’ decisions. The verbalisation technique is said to directly represent cognitive task processes while not affecting performance. Using a combined methodology of concurrent and retrospective verbalisation to study the effects of verbalisation on pilots’ task performance in simulator conditions, the findings of this case study suggest that, on the contrary, instructing operators to verbalise their thought processes while performing complex tasks may interfere with task-related cognition under some conditions, thereby compromising safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott T (1993) Functional categories for future flight deck designs (NASA Technical Memorandum TM-109005). NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman HS, Nelson WR (1987) Techniques for incorporating operator expertise into intelligent aids and training. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 22:371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waard D (1996) The measurement of drivers’ mental workload. Groningen University, Traffic Research Center, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker SW (2002) Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance. J Saf Res 33(3):371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dix A, Finlay J, Abowd G, Beale R (1993) Human–computer interaction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan J, Williams P, Brown I (1991) Components of driving skill: experience does not mean expertise. Ergonomics 34:919–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl L, Bates P, Murray PS, Glendon AI, Creed PA (2012) Testing the benefits of a single pilot line operations safety audit: an aviation pilot study. Aviat Psychol Appl Hum Factors 2(2):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis R (ed) (2005) Planning and task performance in a second language. John Benjamins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1978) Retrospective verbal reports as data. Carnegie-Mellon University, Department of Psychology, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1980) Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev 87:215–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1993) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data, revised edn. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandsson M, Jansson A (2013) Verbal reports and domain-specific knowledge: a comparison between collegial and retrospective verbalisation. Cogn Technol Work 15(3):239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox MC, Ericsson KA, Best R (2011) Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychol Bull 137(2):316–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee JP (2014) An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery grounded theory: strategies for qualitative inquiry. Aldin, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantowitz BH (1988) Defining and measuring pilot mental workload. In: NASA. Langley Research Center, Mental-State Estimation, 1987, p 179–188 (SEE N88-23370 16-53)

  • Lave J (1988) Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev AN (1978) Activity, consciousness and personality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria AR (1981) Language and cognition. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlroy RC, Stanton NA, Remington B (2012) Developing expertise in military communications planning: do verbal reports change with experience? Behav Inf Technol 31(6):617–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci 7(3):134–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier KL, Skitka LJ, Heers S, Burdick M (1998) Automation bias: decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits. Int J Aviat Psychol 8(1):47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J, Christiansen N (2000) Mindtape: a tool for reflection in participatory design. In participatory design. In: Cherkasky T, Greenbaum J, Mambrey P, Pors JK (eds) Proceedings of participatory design conference: designing digital environments, November 28–December 1, 2000, New York. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, Stanford, CA, pp 309–313

  • Nielsen J, Clemmensen T, Yssing C (2002) Getting access to what goes on in people’s heads? reflections on the think-aloud technique. In: Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on human–computer interaction, Aarhus, Denmark, October 19–23. ACM, New York, pp 101–110

  • Nisbett RE, Wilson TD (1977) Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol Rev 84:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth WM, Lee Y-J (2007) “Vygotsky’s neglected theory”: cultural-historical activity theory. Rev Educ Res 77(2):186–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaife M, Rogers Y (1996) External cognition: how do graphical representations work? Int J Hum Comput Stud 45(2):185–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale C, Silverman D (1997) Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. Eur J Pub Health 7(4):379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky P (1998) Thinking and speech and protocol analysis. Mind Cult Act 5(3):157–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KL, Dionne JP (2000) Accessing problem solving strategy knowledge: the complimentary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. J Educ Psychol 92(3):413–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartofsky MW (1979) Models: representation and the scientific understanding (Boston Studies in the philosophy and history of science, 129. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wertcsh JV (1985) Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright RB, Converse SA (1992) Method bias and concurrent verbal protocol in software usability testing. In: Proceedings of human factors society 36th annual meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, pp 1220–1224

Download references

Acknowledgements

With acknowledgement to Wolff Michael Roth for his valued advice and review of the paper in its early stages.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurie Earl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Earl, L., Mavin, T.J. & Soo, K. Demands on cognitive processing: implications for verbalisation in complex work environments. Cogn Tech Work 19, 31–46 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0395-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0395-x

Keywords

Navigation