Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shared control architectures for vehicle steering

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various schemes for sharing control between a human driver and automation system have been proposed, each with the aim of freeing attention while supporting smooth transitions of authority when the control challenge exceeds driver or automation capabilities. When sharing control of a vehicle, it can be expected that the driver develops internal models of the automation and its capabilities and assumes or assigns intent to its actions. In this paper, we develop system models of input mixing and haptic shared control to describe the communication channels open to the driver for monitoring automation behavior and determining automation intent. We pay particular attention to haptic (torque) feedback in the axis of steering that functions both to carry information and to couple the dynamics of the driver’s backdrivable arms and hands with the dynamics of the automation system and vehicle. We assess the various feedback loops present for their promise to reduce cognitive load while maintaining situation awareness. An interpretation of the backdrivable biomechanics and automation impedance in terms of potential wells produces insight into the structured information available through haptic feedback and the internal models that the driver uses to predict automation behavior. The constructed models make explicit the additional communication channels open between human and automation in haptic shared control relative to input mixing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbink DA, Carlson T, Mark M, de Winter JCF, Farzad A, Gibo TL, Boer ER (2018) A topology of shared control systems—finding common ground in diversity. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 99:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbink DA, Mulder M (2010) Neuromuscular analysis as a guideline in designing shared control. In: Advances in haptics. InTechOpen

  • Abbink DA, Mulder M, Van Paassen MM (2011) Measurements of muscle use during steering wheel manipulation. In: Systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), pp 1652–1657

  • Abbink DA, Mulder M (2009) Exploring the dimensions of haptic feedback support in manual control. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 9(1):011006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbink DA, Mark M, Boer ER (2012) Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? Cogn Technol Work 14(1):19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo SMC, Pollini L, Innocenti M, Bresciani J-B, Bülthoff HH (2012) Experimental comparison of direct and indirect haptic aids in support of obstacle avoidance for remotely piloted vehicles. J Mech Eng Autom 2(10):628–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J, Walker S, Iagnemma K (2014) Experimental performance analysis of a constraint-based navigation framework. Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 2017:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendtsen J, Trangbaek K (2014) Closed-loop identification for control of linear parameter varying systems. Asian J Control 16(1):40–49

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm P, Ghasemi AH, O’Modhrain MS, Paramsothy J, Gillespie RB (2016) Architectures for shared control of vehicle steering. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(19):639–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole D (2008) Neuromuscular dynamics and steering feel. In: Proceedings of SteeringTech, TU Munich, Germany

  • Endsley MR, Kiris EO (1995) The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum Fact 37(2):381–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1962) Observations on active touch. Psychol Rev 69(6):477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Oxford, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie RB, Ghasemi AH, Freudenberg JS (2016) Human motor control and the internal model principle. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(19):114–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PG, Gillespie RB (2005) Sharing control between humans and automation using haptic interface: primary and secondary task performance benefits. Hum Fact 47(3):574–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajian AZ, Howe RD (1997) Identification of the mechanical impedance at the human finger tip. J Biomech Eng 119(1):109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasser CJ, Cutkosky MR (2002) System identification of the human hand grasping a haptic knob. In: Symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems, pp 180–190

  • Inagaki T (2003) Adaptive automation: sharing and trading of control. Handbook of cognitive task design. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 171–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly A, Shimono K, Zheng R, Kaizuka T, Nakano K (2018) Influence of haptic guidance on arm admittance of drivers under steering perturbations. Int J Intell Transp Syst Res 16(3):187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzourakis DI, Abbink DA, Efstathios V, Edward H, Riender H (2014) Driver’s arms’ time-variant neuromuscular admittance during real car test-track driving. IEEE Trans Instr Meas 63(1):221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok B, Johns M, Lee KJ, Miller D, Sirkin D, Ive P, Ju W (2015) Emergency, automation off: unstructured transition timing for distracted drivers of automated vehicles. In: 2015 IEEE 18th international conference on intelligent transportation systems, pp 2458–2464. IEEE

  • Mulder M, Abbink DA, Boer ER, van Paassen MM (2012) Human-centered steer-by-wire design: steering wheel dynamics should be task dependent. In: Systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), pp 3015–3019

  • Nishimura R, Wada T, Sugiyama S (2015) Haptic shared control in steering operation based on cooperative status between a driver and a driver assistance system. J Hum Robot Interact 4(3):19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivari M, Nieuwenhuizen FM, Bülthoff HH, Pollini L (2015) Identifying time-varying neuromuscular response: a recursive least-squares algorithm with pseudoinverse. In: Systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), pp 3079–3085

  • O’Malley MK, Abhishek G, Matthew G, Yanfang L (2006) Shared control in haptic systems for performance enhancement and training. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 128(1):75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman R, Riley V (1997) Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum Fact 39(2):230–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petermeijer SM, Abbink DA, Mark M, de Winter JCF (2015) The effect of haptic support systems on driver performance: a literature survey. IEEE Trans Hapt 8(4):467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips-Grafflin C, Suay HB, Mainprice J, Alunni N, Lofaro D, Berenson D, Chernova S, Lindeman RW, Oh P (2014) From autonomy to cooperative traded control of humanoid manipulation tasks with unreliable communication: system design and lessons learned. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 3767–3774

  • Pick AJ, Cole DJ (2007) Dynamic properties of a driver’s arms holding a steering wheel. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng 221(12):1475–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Profumo L, Pollini L, Abbink DA (2013) Direct and indirect haptic aiding for curve negotiation. In: Systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), 2013 IEEE international conference on. IEEE, pp 1846–1852

  • Pronker AJ, Abbink DA, Van Paassen MM, Mulder M (2017) Estimating driver time-varying neuromuscular admittance through lpv model and grip force. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1):14916–14921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse WB (1976) Adaptive allocation of decision making responsibility between supervisor and computer. In: Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. Springer, pp 295–306

  • Saito T, Wada T, Sonoda K (2018) Control authority transfer method for automated-to-manual driving via a shared authority mode. IEEE Trans Intell Veh 3(2):198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarter N, Woods D, Billings C, Salvendy C (1997) Automation surprises. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. Wiley, New York, pp 1926–1943

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan TB, Verplank WL (1978) Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. Technical report, Massachusetts Inst of Tech Cambridge Man-machine Systems Lab

  • Song P, Kumar V (2002) A potential field based approach to multi-robot manipulation. In: Proceedings, international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), vol 2, pp 1217–1222

  • Steele M, Gillespie RB (2001) Shared control between human and machine: using a haptic steering wheel to aid in land vehicle guidance. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 45. SAGE, Los Angeles, pp 1671–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storms JG, Tilbury DM (2014) Blending of human and obstacle avoidance control for a high speed mobile robot. In: American Control Conference (ACC), 2014, pp 3488–3493

  • Switkes JP, Rossetter EJ, Coe IA, Gerdes JC (2006) Handwheel force feedback for lanekeeping assistance: combined dynamics and stability. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 128(3):532–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu B, Gillespie RB, Freudenberg JS, Cook JA (2014) Identification of human feedforward control in grasp and twist tasks. In: American control conference (ACC), 2014. IEEE, pp 2833–2838

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Automotive Research Center (ARC) under Cooperative Agreement W56HZV-04-2-0001 with the U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC) Warren, MI. UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. #OPSEC125.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, USA

    Amir H. Ghasemi

  2. U.S. Army RDECOM-TARDEC, Warren, MI, 48397, USA

    Paramsothy Jayakumar

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA

    R. Brent Gillespie

Authors
  1. Amir H. Ghasemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paramsothy Jayakumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Brent Gillespie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Brent Gillespie.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, A.H., Jayakumar, P. & Gillespie, R.B. Shared control architectures for vehicle steering. Cogn Tech Work 21, 699–709 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00560-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00560-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation