Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of a medical information system: the mediating role of use and user satisfaction on the success of human interaction with the mobile healthcare system (iHeart)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

iHeart is a mobile healthcare system which monitors and tracks patients with hypertension and arrhythmia. This empirical study aims to assess the interaction between human and iHeart. In line with this, a survey was conducted among healthcare professional in two cities of Isfahan and Penang to find how intention to “Use” of iHeart and “User satisfaction” conveys the role of effective factors [Information Quality (IQ), Service Quality (SQ), System Quality (SysQ), Trust (Tr), Anxiety (Ax), and mHealth Literacy (mHL)] to the “Success of Human Interaction (SHI)” with iHeart. The total number of 323 respondents returned the questionnaire. Using DeLone and McLean IS success model, a conceptual model was developed to identify the mediating effects of “Use” and “User satisfaction”. Covariance-based structural equation modelling was applied for data analysis using the statistical software AMOS. In this study, mediation effect was examined in three different methods including Baron and Kenny, Sobel test, and Bootstrapping technique. The most reliable results are from bootstrapping technique, which indicate that “Use” mediates the effects of SysQ, Tr, and mHL on SHI. In addition, “User satisfaction” is a mediator between SysQ, SQ, and mHL with SHI. Ultimately, IQ has direct effect on SHI without involvement of mediator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Analysis of Moment Structures  (Lani 2019).

References

  • Acharya C, Thimbleby H, Oladimeji P (2010) Human computer interaction and medical devices. In: McEwan T, McKinnon LM (eds) Proceedings of the 24th BCS interaction specialist group conference. BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, Dundee, United Kingdom, pp 168–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahern D, Phalen JM, Eaton CB (2008) The role of eHealth in patient engagement and quality improvement. In: Gibbons MC (ed) eHealth solutions for healthcare disparities. Springer, New York, NY, pp 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlan AR, Ahmad BI (2014) User acceptance of health information technology (HIT) in developing countries: a conceptual model. Proc Technol 16:1287–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Akter S, D’Ambra J, Ray P (2010) Service quality of mHealth platforms: development and validation of a hierarchical model using PLS. Electron Mark 20:209–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-010-0043-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akter S, D’Ambra J, Ray P (2013) Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of mHealth. Inf Manag 50:181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert C (2002) Service loyalty: the effects of service quality and the mediating role of customer satisfaction. Eur J Mark 36:811–828. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560210430818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert W, Tullis T (2013) Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Interactive technologies, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemdar H, Ersoy C (2010) Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: a survey. Comput Netw 54:2688–2710

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandre B, Reynaud E, Osiurak F, Navarro J (2018) Acceptance and acceptability criteria: a literature review. Cognit Technol Work 20:165–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0459-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhendawi KM, Baharudin AS (2014) The impact of interaction quality factors on the effectiveness of Web-based information system: the mediating role of user satisfaction. Cognit Technol Work 16:451–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-013-0272-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alnanih R, Ormandjieva O (2016) Mapping HCI principles to design quality of mobile user interfaces in healthcare applications. Proc Comput Sci 94:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Arawati A, Mokhtar A (2000) The mediating effect of customer satisfaction on TQM practices and financial performance. Singap Manag Rev 22(2):55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Personal Soc Psychol 51:1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastien JC, Scapin DL (1993) Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human–computer interfaces. PhD, INRIA (inria-00070012)

  • Benmoussa K, Laaziri M, Khoulji S, Larbi Kerkeb M, Yamami A (2019) Enhanced model for ergonomic evaluation of information systems: application to scientific research information system. Int J Electr Comput Eng 9:683–694. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore TW, Pfeifer LM, Paasche-Orlow MK (2009) Using computer agents to explain medical documents to patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns 75:315–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Broberg O (1997) Integrating ergonomics into the product development process. Int J Ind Ergon 19:317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00041-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner J, Chuang E, Goldzweig C, Cain CL, Sugar C, Yano EM (2017) User-centered design to improve clinical decision support in primary care. Int J Med Informatics 104:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha M (2016) The mediation effect of mattering and self-esteem in the relationship between socially prescribed perfectionism and depression: based on the social disconnection model. Personal Individ Differ 88:148–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Chakraborty S, Sarker S, Sarker S, Lau FY (2009) Examining the success factors for mobile work in healthcare: a deductive study. Decis Support Syst 46:620–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau PYK, Hu PJ-H (2002) Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inf Manag 39:297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00098-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung GW, Lau RS (2008) Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: bootstrapping with structural equation models. Org Res Methods 11(2):296–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisalita C, Melguizo MCP, Hoorn JF, Veer GCVD, Kok E (2005) Cultural differences in user groups: a multi-angle understanding of IT use in large organizations. Cognit Technol Work 7:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0175-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins SA, Currie LM, Bakken S, Vawdrey DK, Stone PW (2012) Health literacy screening instruments for eHealth applications: a systematic review. J Biomed Inform 45:598–607

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res 3(1):60–95

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19:9–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Doll WJ, Al-Gahtani SS, Larsen TJ, Pearson JM, Raghunathan TS (2008) A cross-cultural analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument: a multi-group invariance analysis. Inf Manag 45:211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despont-Gros C, Mueller H, Lovis C (2005) Evaluating user interactions with clinical information systems: a model based on human–computer interaction models. J Biomed Inf 38:244–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan W (2016) Mediation role of individual strengths in dispositional mindfulness and mental health. Personal Individ Differ 99:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyrstad DN, Testad I, Aase K, Storm M (2015) A review of the literature on patient participation in transitions of the elderly. Cognit Technol Work 17:15–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0300-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1982) The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans, vol 38. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Phildelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1992) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. In: Breakthroughs in statistics. Springer, Berlin, pp 569–593

  • Ehsan U, Ashill N (2014) Drivers of patients’ trusts in doctors: a study of private healthcare in Pakistan International. J Healthc Manag 7:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Eslami Jahromi M, Ahmadian L (2018) Evaluating satisfaction of patients with stutter regarding the tele-speech therapy method and infrastructure. Int J Med Inf 115:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan X, Thompson B, Wang L (1999) Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6:56–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz MS, MacKinnon DP (2007) Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychol Sci 18:233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher D, Ting L, Palmer A (2008) A journey into the unknown; taking the fear out of structural equation modeling with AMOS for the first-time user. Mark Rev 8:255–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Smith D, Effken JA (2013) Development and initial evaluation of the clinical information systems success model (CISSM). Int J Med Inf 82:539–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Getty RL (1999) Ergonomics and the customer satisfaction model: ergonomics in the language of business. Proc Human Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 43(14):815–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129904301401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross S, Bardzell J, Bardzell S, Stallings M (2017) Persuasive anxiety: designing and deploying material and formal explorations of personal tracking devices. Hum Comput Interact 32:297–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education (US), Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1986) Multivariate data analysis with readings. Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis, vol 6. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2013) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2016) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Halttu K, Oinas-Kukkonen H (2017) Persuading to reflect: role of reflection and insight in persuasive systems design for physical health. Hum Comput Interact 32:381–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameed SS, Rawal I, Soni D, Ajay VS, Goenka S, Prabhakaran D (2016) Technology for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cardiometabolic disease in India. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 58:620–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2016.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim AM, Dawal SZM (2012) Kano model and QFD integration approach for ergonomic design improvement. Proc Soc Behav Sci 57:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr 76:408–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes A, Scharkow M (2013) The relative trustworthiness of popular inferential approaches to testing indirect effects in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter. Psychological Sci 24(10):1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewett TT et al (1992) ACM SIGCHI curricula for human–computer interaction. ACM, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshfield LM, Hirshfield SH, Hincks S, Russell M, Ward R, Williams T (2011) Trust in human-computer interactions as measured by frustration, surprise, and workload. In: Schmorrow DD, Fidopiastis CM (eds) Foundations of augmented cognition. Directing the future of adaptive systems: 6th international conference, FAC 2011, Held as Part of HCI International 2011, Orlando, FL, USA, July 9–14, 2011. Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, pp 507–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes-Smith P, Coote L, Cunningham E (2006) Structural equation modeling: from the fundamentals to advanced topics. SREAMS, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle RH (2012) Handbook of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C-H, Chang J-J, Tang K-Y (2016) Exploring the influential factors in continuance usage of mobile social Apps: satisfaction, habit, and customer value perspectives. Telemat Inf 33:342–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa H, Kiuchi T (2010) Health literacy and health communication. BioPsychoSoc Med 4:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa H, Takeuchi T, Yano E (2008) Measuring functional, communicative, and critical health literacy among diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 31:874–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Zarco AI, González-González I, Saigí-Rubió F, Torrent-Sellens J (2015) The co-learning process in healthcare professionals: assessing user satisfaction in virtual communities of practice. Comput Hum Behav 51:1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joinson AN, Reips U-D, Buchanan T, Schofield CBP (2010) Privacy, trust, and self-disclosure online. Hum Comput Interact 25:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi F, Poo DCC, Tan YM (2015) Clinical information systems end user satisfaction: the expectations and needs congruencies effects. J Biomed Inform 53:342–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Keikhosrokiani P, Mustaffa N, Zakaria N, Sarwar MI (2012) A proposal to design a location-based mobile cardiac emergency system (LMCES). Stud Health Technol Inform 182:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Keikhosrokiani P, Mustaffa N, Zakaria N (2018) Success factors in developing iHeart as a patient-centric healthcare system: a multi-group analysis. Telemat Inform 35:753–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keikhosrokiani P, Mustaffa N, Zakaria N, Baharudin AS (2019) User behavioral intention toward using mobile healthcare system. In: Consumer-driven technologies in healthcare: breakthroughs in research and practice. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp 429–444. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6198-9.ch022

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khajouei R, Wierenga PC, Hasman A, Jaspers MWM (2011) Clinicians satisfaction with CPOE ease of use and effect on clinicians’ workflow, efficiency and medication safety. Int J Med Inf 80:297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Lee HS (2014) Quality, perceived usefulness, user satisfaction, and intention to use: an empirical study of ubiquitous personal robot service. Asian Soc Sci 10:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Chang Y, Park M-C, Lee J (2015) The effects of service interactivity on the satisfaction and the loyalty of smartphone users. Telemat Inform 32:949–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lance CE, Vandenberg RJ (2010) Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: doctrine, verity and fable in organizational and social sciences. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Lani J (2019) AMOS. Academic solutions. https://www.statisticssolutions.com/amos/

  • Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P (2003) Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manag 40:191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRouge C, Ma J, Sneha S, Tolle K (2013) User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies. Int J Med Inform 82:e251–e268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L (2004) Calculating the confidence intervals using bootstrap presentation notes. University of Toronto, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Lien C-H, Cao Y, Zhou X (2017) Service quality, satisfaction, stickiness, and usage intentions: an exploratory evaluation in the context of WeChat services. Comput Hum Behav 68:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobach DF, Arbanas JM, Mishra DD, Campbell M, Wildemuth BM (2004) Adapting the human–computer interface for reading literacy and computer skill to facilitate collection of information directly from patients. Medinfo 11:1142–1146

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord K, Ibrahim K, Kumar S, Rudd N, Mitchell AJ, Symonds P (2010) Measuring trust in healthcare professionalsda study of ethnically diverse UK cancer patients. Clin Oncol 24:13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Love S (2005) Introduction to mobile human-computer interaction. Understanding mobile human–computer interaction. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • LT Hu, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay M (2004) The speed of mouse-click as a measure of anxiety during human–computer interaction. Behav Inf Technol 23:427–433

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods 1:130

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnen D, Lockwood C, Hoffman J, West S, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychol Methods 7:83–104

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 7:83

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BF (2006) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, vol 70. CRC Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marakhimov A, Joo J (2017) Consumer adaptation and infusion of wearable devices for healthcare. Comput Hum Behav 76:135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP (1988) Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull 103:391

    Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen S, Korpela M, Tiihonen T (2014) User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers’ viewpoint in Finland. Int J Med Inform 83:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masrom M, Hussein R (2008) User acceptance of information technology: understanding theories and models. Venton Publishing (M) Sdn. Bhd., Selangor darul Ehsan

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu JE, Taylor SR (2006) Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. J Org Behav 27:1031–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Maydeu-Olivares A, Garcia-Forero C (2010) Goodness-of-fit testing. Int Encycl Educ 7:190–196

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane DC, Latorella KA (2002) The scope and importance of human interruption in human–computer interaction design. Hum Comput Interact 17:1–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne RA et al (2015) Predictors of high eHealth literacy in primary lung cancer survivors. J Cancer Educ 30:685–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Mira BP (2010) Validity of Delone and Mclean’s model of information systems success at the web site level of analysis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague ENH, Winchester WW, Kleiner BM (2010) Trust in medical technology by patients and healthcare providers in obstetric work systems. Behav Inf Technol 29:541–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro BH (2005) Statistical methods for health care research, vol 1. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman C (2011) eHealth literacy 2.0: problems and opportunities with an evolving concept. J Med Internet Res 13:e125

    Google Scholar 

  • Novo J, Hermida A, Ortega M, Barreira N, Penedo MG, López JE, Calvo C (2017) Hydra: a web-based system for cardiovascular analysis, diagnosis and treatment. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 139:61–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor Y, O’Donoghue J, O’Reilly P (2011) Understanding mobile technology post-adoption behaviour: impact upon knowledge creation and individual performance. In: 2011 10th international conference on mobile business. IEEE, pp 275–282

  • Okazaki S, Castañeda AJ, Sanz S, Henseler J (2012) Factors affecting mobile diabetes monitoring adoption among physicians: questionnaire study and path model. J Med Internet Res 14:e183

    Google Scholar 

  • Okazaki S, Blas SS, Castañeda JA (2015) Physicians’ adoption of mobile health monitoring systems in spain: competing models and impact of prior experience. J Electro Commer Res 16:194

    Google Scholar 

  • Oulasvirta A, Brewster S (2008) Mobile human–computer interaction. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66:833–837

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandian P (2016) An overview of telemedicine technologies for healthcare applications. IJBCE 5:29–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasiou G, Drigas A, Skianis C, Lytras M, Papanastasiou E (2018) Patient-centric ICTs based healthcare for students with learning, physical and/or sensory disabilities. Telemat Inf 35:654–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattichis C, Kyriacou E, Voskarides S, Pattichis M, Istepanian R, Schizas CN (2002) Wireless telemedicine systems: an overview. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 44:143–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Petter S, Fruhling A (2011) Evaluating the success of an emergency response medical information system. Int J Med Inform 80:480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocius KE (1991) Personality factors in human–computer interaction: a review of the literature. Comput Hum Behav 7:103–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole ES (2013) HCI and mobile health interventions: How human–computer interaction can contribute to successful mobile health interventions. Transl Behav Med 3:402–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Porat T, Tractinsky N (2012) It’s a pleasure buying here: the effects of web-store design on consumers’ emotions and attitudes. Hum Comput Interact 27:235–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell AL (2013) Computer anxiety: comparison of research from the 1990s and 2000s. Comput Hum Behav 29:2337–2381

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36:717–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Qazi A, Tamjidyamcholo A, Raj RG, Hardaker G, Standing C (2017) Assessing consumers’ satisfaction and expectations through online opinions: expectation and disconfirmation approach. Comput Hum Behav 75:450–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim H (2016) The mediating role of customer satisfaction: evidence from the airline industry. Asia Pac J Mark Log 28:234–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravikumar N, Metcalfe NH, Ravikumar J, Prasad R (2016) Smartphone applications for providing ubiquitous healthcare over cloud with the advent of embeddable implants. Wirel Pers Commun 86:1439–1446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2999-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren-Guey L, Kuei-Chien C, Chun-Chieh H, Chwan-Lu T (2007) A mobile care system with alert mechanism. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 11:507–517. https://doi.org/10.1109/titb.2006.888701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS (1998) Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad Manag Rev 23:393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin J, Chisnell D (2008) Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design and conduct effective tests. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoso AS, Maureen Nelloh LA (2017) User satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer online transportation: a replication study. Proc Comput Sci 124:379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2012) Research methods for business students, 6th edn. Pearson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scapin DL, Bastien JMC (1997) Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems. Behav Inf Technol 16:220–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492997119806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnall R et al (2016) A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps). J Biomed Inform 60:243–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon P, Kiew M-Y (1996) A partial test and development of Delone and Mclean's model of IS success. Australas J Inf Syst. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v4i1.379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon P, Kiew M-Y, Patry M (1994) A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Paper presented at the International conference on information systems (ICIS)

  • Serumaga-Zake PAE (2017) The role of user satisfaction in implementing a business. Intell Syst 19:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Shammout AB (2007) Evaluating an extended relationship marketing model for Arab guests of five-star hotels. Victoria University, Footscray

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol 13:290–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørum H, Andersen KN, Vatrapu R (2012) Public websites and human–computer interaction: an empirical study of measurement of website quality and user satisfaction. Behav Inf Technol 31:697–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruit M, Lytras M (2018) Applied data science in patient-centric healthcare: adaptive analytic systems for empowering physicians and patients. Telemat Inform 35:643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger JH (2007) Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personal Individ Differ 42:893–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan SM, Peters ES, Trapido EJ, Oral E, Scribner RA, Rung AL (2016) Assessing mediation of behavioral and stress pathways in the association between neighborhood environments and obesity outcomes. Prevent Med Rep 4:248–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Taifa IWR, Desai DA, Bulsara NM (2018) The development of an ergonomically designed product through an integrated product team approach. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 5:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1557398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telemedicine CoECAo, Medicine Io (1996) Telemedicine: a guide to assessing telecommunications for health care. The National Academies Press, Washington D.C.

  • Tilahun B, Fritz F (2015) Modeling antecedents of electronic medical record system implementation success in low-resource setting hospitals. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 15:61

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey JW (1958) Bias and confidence in not-quite large samples. Ann Math Stat 29:614

    Google Scholar 

  • Tussyadiah IP (2016) Factors of satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation. Int J Hosp Manag 55:70–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Vaart R, Drossaert CHC, de Heus M, Taal E, van de Laar MAFJ (2013) Measuring actual eHealth literacy among patients with rheumatic diseases: a qualitative analysis of problems encountered using health 1.0 and health 2.0 applications. J Med Internet Res 15:e27

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen F (2017) Towards increased systems resilience: new challenges based on dissonance control for human reliability in cyber-physical and human systems. Annu Rev Control 44:316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos PA, Vrechopoulos AP (2008) Determinants of behavioral intentions in the mobile internet services market. J Serv Mark 22:280–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner RM (2012) Applied statistics: from bivariate through multivariate techniques: from bivariate through multivariate techniques. Sage, Newcastle upon Tyne

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts N, Hutton-Rogers L (2013) Barriers to achieving e-health literacy. Am J Health Sci 4:115

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD, Gordon SE, Liu Y (1998) An introduction to human factors engineering. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfle LM (1999) Sewall wright on the method of path coefficients: an annotated bibliography. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6:280–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1921) Correlation and causation. J Agric Res 20:557–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1923) The theory of path coefficients a reply to Niles’s criticism. Genetics 8:239–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright PC, Fields RE, Harrison MD (2000) Analyzing human–computer interaction as distributed cognition: the resources model. Hum Comput Interact 15:1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu F, Du JT (2018) Factors influencing users’ satisfaction and loyalty to digital libraries in Chinese universities. Comput Hum Behav 83:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Furie D, Mahabhaleshwar M, Suresh B, Chouhan H (2019) Applications of an interaction, process, integration, and intelligence (IPII) design approach for ergonomics solutions. Ergonomics 5:1–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1588996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Z, Kantola R, Zhang P (2011) Theoretical issues in the study of trust in human-computer interaction. In: 2011 IEEE 10th international conference on trust, security and privacy in computing and communications. IEEE, pp 853–856

  • Yi MY, Jackson JD, Park JS, Probst JC (2006) Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Inf Manag 43:350–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusof MM, Paul RJ, Stergioulas LK (2006) Towards a framework for health information systems evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS'06), vol 5. IEEE, pp 95a–95a. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2006.491

  • Zhang Z (2014) Monte Carlo based statistical power analysis for mediation models: methods and software. Behav Res Methods 46:1184–1198

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijlstra W, Becker C, Pfeiffer K (2011) Wearable systems for monitoring mobility related activities. Clinical technologies: concepts, methodologies, tools and applications. IGI Global, Pennsylvania, pp 801–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinner T, Wamser F, Leopold H, Dobre C, Mavromoustakis CX, Garcia NM (2017) Matching requirements for ambient assisted living and enhanced living environments with networking technologies. In: Dobre C, Mavromoustakis C, Garcia N, Goleva R, Mastorakis G (eds) Ambient assisted living and enhanced living environments, chap 5. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 91–121

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to School of Computer Sciences and Institute of Postgraduate Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia for the prestigious USM Fellowship Scheme granted to Pantea Keikhosrokiani to pursue her Doctoral studies in Service System Engineering. The work would not have been possible without continuous supports from School of Computer Sciences and her dear supervisors. Moreover, the data collection was funded by short-term research grant from Universiti Sains Malaysia. Finally, the authors would like to thank National Advanced IPv6 Centre of Excellence (Nav6), Universiti Sains Malaysia for providing the facilities and environment to prepare this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pantea Keikhosrokiani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keikhosrokiani, P., Mustaffa, N., Zakaria, N. et al. Assessment of a medical information system: the mediating role of use and user satisfaction on the success of human interaction with the mobile healthcare system (iHeart). Cogn Tech Work 22, 281–305 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00565-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00565-4

Keywords

Navigation