Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Taking advantage of metadata semantics: the case of learning-object-based lesson graphs

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning objects (LOs) are pieces of educational material characterized with a valuable amount of information about their content and usage. This additional information is defined as a set of metadata generally following the IEEE LOM specification. This specification also serves to characterize the relations existing between LOs. LOs whose relations are explicit are regarded as the nodes of a lesson graph. Link types and LO metadata constitute the lesson graph semantics. This article proposes to take advantage of lesson graph semantics using a context diffusion approach. It consists in diffusing the metadata-based processes along the edges of the lesson graph. This technique aims at coping with the metadata processing issues arising when some graph metadata are missing, incorrect, or incomplete. This article also presents a three-layer extensible framework for easing the use of context diffusion in a graph. As part of the framework, two original types of metadata processes are introduced. The first one takes advantage of the metadata attribute similarities between related LOs. The second one focuses on the lesson graph consistency. The framework and the application examples were implemented as an open-source Java library used in the lesson graph authoring tool LessonMapper2. During the lesson authoring process, we show that the framework can bring support not only for generating and validating metadata, but also for retrieving LOs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aumann Y, Feldman R, Liberzon Y, Rosenfeld B, Schler J (2006) Visual information extraction. Knowl Inf Syst 10(1): 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrit C, Lewis D, Wieseler W (1999) Cisco systems reusable information object strategy version 3.0, Technical report, http://www.cisco.com

  3. Brase J (2005) Usage of metadata, PhD thesis, University of Hannover

  4. Brooks C, McCalla G (2006) Towards flexible learning object metadata. Int J Contin Eng Lifelong Learn 16(1): 50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cancore (2007) http://www.cancore.ca

  6. Currier S, Barton J, O’Beirne R, Ryan B (2004) Quality assurance for digital learning object repositories: issues for the metadata creation process. ALT J 12(1): 5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dif (2007) Metadata diffusion framework. http://metadatadiffuse.googlecode.com

  8. Downes, S. (2004) Ressource profiles. J Interac Media Edu Spec Issue Educ Semant Web. 5. ISSN:1365-893X. http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2004/1/

  9. DublinCore (2007) Metadata initiative. http://www.dublincore.org

  10. DublinCoreEdu (2007) Dublin core metadata initiative education working group. http://dublincore.org/groups/education

  11. Duval E, Hodgins (2004) Metadata matters. In: International conference on metadata and dublin core specifications (DC 2004)

  12. Fischer S (2001) Course and exercise sequencing using metadata in adaptive hypermedia learning systems. J Educ Resour Comput 1(1es): 5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Freund Y, Iyer RD, Schapire RE, Singer Y (2003) An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. J Mach Learn Res 4: 933–969

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Friesen N (2004) International lom survey report, Technical report, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC36

  15. Genest D, Chein M (2005) A content-search information retrieval process based on conceptual graphs. Knowl Inf Syst 8: 292–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hatala M, Richards G (2003) Value-added metatagging: Ontology and rule based methods for smarter metadata. In: Schroeder M, Wagner G (eds) RuleML. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2876. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 65–80

  17. Heath BP, McArthur DJ, McClelland MK, Vetter RJ (2005) Metadata lessons from the ilumina digital library. Commun ACM 48(7): 68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. IMS (2007) IMS global learning consortium. http://www.imsglobal.org last visit on 05/2006

  19. JEN (2007) A semantic web framework for java. http://jena.sourceforge.net/

  20. LM2 (2007) Lessonmapper2 web site. http://lm2.eduforge.org

  21. LOM (2002) IEEE LTSC p1484.12.1 learning object metadata specification final draft. http://ieeeltsc.org/wg12LOM/

  22. LOM (2003) The rdf binding of lom. http://kmr.nada.kth.se/el/ims/metadata.html

  23. Lucene (2007) Full-featured text search engine library in java. http://lucene.apache.org

  24. Marchiori M (1998) The limits of web metadata, and beyond. In: Proceedings of seventh international conference on world wide web (WWW98). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–9

  25. Massart D, Verbeke J, Capron C, Schlesier K (2005) Visual presentation of data by means of box plots. LC-GC Eur 18(4)

  26. McCalla G (1992) The search for adaptability, flexibility, and individualization: Approaches to curriculum in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Jones M, Winne P (eds) Foundations and frontiers of adaptive learning environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 91–122

  27. Motelet O (2007a) Experiment data (repository snapshot and test cases). http://reflex.dcc.uchile.cl/lm/lessonMapper2/IRTests.zip

  28. Motelet O (2007b) Improving learning-object metadata usage during lesson authoring, PhD thesis, Universidad de Chile

  29. Motelet O, Piwowarski B, Dupret G, Pino JA, Baloian N (2007) Enhancing educational-material retrieval using authored-lesson metadata. In: Symposium on string processing and information retrieval (SPIRE07). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4726. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 239–248

  30. Najjar J, Duval E (2006) Actual use of learning objects and metadata: an empirical analysis. IEEE Tech Comm Digit Libr Bull (TCDL) 2(2)

  31. Ochoa SF, Pino JA, Baloian N, Fuller DA (2003) Icesee: a tool for developing engineering courseware. Comput Appl Eng Educ 11(2): 53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ochoa X, Cardinaels K, Meire M, Duval E (2005) Frameworks for the automatic indexation of learning management systems content into learning object repositories. In: World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2005). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp 1407–1414

  33. Ochoa X, Duval E (2006) Quality metrics for learning object metadata. In: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2006). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp 1004–1011

  34. Palopoli L, Rosaci D, Terracina G, Ursino D (2005) A graph-based approach for extracting terminological properties from information sources with heterogeneous formats. Knowl Inf Syst 8: 462–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Santoro FM, Borges MRS, Santos N (2006) Patterns for designing planning mechanisms in cscl environments. Int J Comput Appl Technol 25(2–3): 102–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. SCORM (2007) Advanced distributed learning scorm (sharable content object reference model). http://www.adlnet.org

  37. Simon B, Dolog P, Miklós Z, Olmedilla D, Sintek M (2004) Conceptualising smart spaces for learning. J Interact Media Educ Spec Issue Educ Semant Web. 5(ISSN: 1365-893X). http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2004/1/

  38. Stuckenschmidt H, Harmelen F (2004) Generating and managing metadata for web-based information systems. Knowl Based Syst 17(5–6): 201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Thabtah FA, Cowling P, Peng Y (2006) Multiple labels associative classification. Knowl Inf Syst 9(1): 109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Trigg R (1983) A network-based approach to text handling for the online scientific community, PhD thesis, University of Maryland

  41. Verbert K, Duval E (2004) Towards a global architecture for learning objects: a comparative analysis of learning object content models. In: World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (EDMEDIA2004). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp 202–208

  42. Wiley D (2000) Learning object design and sequencing theory, PhD thesis, Brigham Young University

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science (DCC), Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Olivier Motelet, Nelson Baloian & José A. Pino

Authors
  1. Olivier Motelet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nelson Baloian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José A. Pino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Motelet.

Additional information

This work extends and improves the article “Taking Advantage of the Semantics of a Lesson Graph based on Learning Objects.” published in proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2007), Los Angeles, USA, 9–13 July 2007, IOS Press.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Motelet, O., Baloian, N. & Pino, J.A. Taking advantage of metadata semantics: the case of learning-object-based lesson graphs. Knowl Inf Syst 20, 323–348 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-008-0181-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-008-0181-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation