Skip to main content
Log in

A taxonomy of novice user perception of error on the Web

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Novice users face many challenges when browsing the Web. The goal of this experiment was to learn about how users perceive error situations when using the World Wide Web. Specifically, the goal was to learn which circumstances cause users to believe that an error has occurred. An exploratory experiment took place with 78 subjects who were novice users. In the experiment the subjects were asked to identify when they perceived that an error had occurred. The subjects reported a total of 219 error situations. These error situations were then classified by the researchers into the following four categories: user error, system error, situational error, and poor Web design. Based on the collected data, suggestions are presented for improving the usability of Web browsers and Web sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold B, Roe R (1987) User errors in human-computer interaction. In: Frese M, Ulich E, Dzida W (eds) Human computer interaction in the workplace, Elsevier, Amsterdam

  2. Birdi K, Zapf D (1997) Age differences in reactions to errors in computer-based work. Behav Info Technol 16(6):309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carroll J, Carrithers C (1984) Training wheels in a user interface. Comm ACM 27(8):800–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll J, Mack R (1984) Learning to use a word processor: by doing, by thinking, and by knowing. In: Thomas J, Schneider M (eds) Human factors in computer systems, Ablex, Norwood, NJ

  5. Carroll J, Mazur S (1986) LisaLearning. IEEE Comp 19(11):35–49

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frese M, Brodbeck F, Heinbokel T, Mooser C, Schleiffenbaum E, Thiemann P (1991) Errors in training computer skills: on the positive function of errors. Hum-Comp Inter 6(1):77–93

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffer J, George J, Valacich J (2002) Modern systems analysis and design (3rd ed). Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

  8. Johnson C (1998). Electronic gridlock, information saturation, and the unpredictability of information retrieval over the World Wide Web. In: Palanque P, Paterno F (eds) Formal methods in human-computer interaction, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  9. Lazar J (2001) User-centered Web development. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA

  10. Lazar J (2003) The World Wide Web. In: Jacko J, Sears A (eds) The international handbook of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

  11. Lazar J, Huang Y (2003) Improved error message design in Web browsers. In: Ratner J (ed) Human factors and Web development (2nd ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

  12. Lazar J, Norcio A (2000) System and training design for end-user error. In: Clarke S, Lehaney B (eds) Human-centered methods in information systems: current research and practice, Idea Group, Hershey, PA

  13. Lazar J, Norcio A (2003) Training novice users in developing strategies for responding to errors when browsing the Web. Int J Hum-Comp Inter 15(3):361–377

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norman D (1983) Design rules based on analyses of human error. Comm ACM 26(4):254–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramsay J, Barbesi A, Preece J (1998) A psychological investigation of long retrieval times on the World Wide Web. Interact Comp 10(1):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sears A, Jacko J (2000) Understanding the relation between network quality of service and the usability of distributed multimedia documents. Hum-Comp Inter 15(1):43–68

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sears A, Jacko J, Borella M (1997) Internet delay effects: how users perceive quality, organization, and ease of use of information. In: Proceedings of CHI 97: Human Factors in Computing, Atlanta, GA, March 1997

  18. Sears A, Jacko J, Dubach E (2000) International aspects of WWW usability and the role of high-end graphical enhancements. Int J Hum-Comp Inter 12:243–263

    Google Scholar 

  19. Senders J, Moray N (1991) Human error: cause, prediction, and reduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shneiderman B (1998) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3rd ed). Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shneiderman B (2000) Universal usability: pushing human-computer interaction research to empower every citizen. Comm ACM 43(5):84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The lead author of this article was partially supported by Training Grant No. T42/CCT310419 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The contents are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Thanks also goes to Adam Jones for assistance with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Lazar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lazar, J., Meiselwitz, G. & Norcio, A. A taxonomy of novice user perception of error on the Web. Univ Access Inf Soc 3, 202–208 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-004-0095-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-004-0095-9

Keywords

Navigation