Abstract
Several countries are considering web-based voting as an alternative to, or a replacement of, traditional voting methods. It is argued that electronic voting could increase voter participation and help strengthen democracy, as e-voting would increase accessibility for large sections of the population, particularly with regard to groups that previously have experienced difficulties with the traditional voting setup. With a focus on usability and accessibility, this paper reports on a study evaluating several electronic voting prototypes in Norway, involving technical aspects as well as expert evaluation and user testing in the field, with users from a wide range of disabled user groups participating in the study. Technical testing regarding accessibility standard compliance, testing with the personas method and user testing revealed that many rather basic universal design principles were either not fully understood or not prioritized for implementation by the solution providers. However, despite various accessibility difficulties, the participants generally showed a positive attitude towards web-based elections. Through the findings of this study, the authors highlight factors that are important to consider in the development and testing of web-based voting systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Halbach, T., Fuglerud, K.S., Dale, Ø., Solheim, I., Schulz, T.: Usability and accessibility evaluation of the upcoming Norwegian E-vote solution. In: Sandnes, F.E., Lunde, M., Tollefsen, M., Hauge, A.M., Øverby, E., Bryn, R. (eds) Unitech 2010, Oslo, May 20, 2010 2010. Tapir Academic Publishers, pp. 156–167
KRD (2009) E-vote 2011 project. http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/krd/prosjekter/e-vote-2011-project.html?id=597658. Accessed February 2010
E-vote 2011 (2009) Accessibility and Usability Requirements: Project: E-vote 2011. System specification document. Norwegian ministry of local government and regional development
Helsedir (2010) The Anti-Discrimination and Accessibility Act. The Norwegian Directorate of Health. http://www.helsedirektoratet.no/portal/page?_pageid=134,67665&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&_piref134_76551_134_67665_67665.artSectionId=3041&navigation1_parentItemId=996&_piref134_76551_134_67665_67665.articleId=184424. Accessed Oct. 2010
W3C WCAG1.0 (2005) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/. Accessed 1. November 2006
NHD: ELMER 2 User Interface Guidelines for Governmental Forms on the Internet. Simplified Forms for the Private Sector. Norwegian Ministry of Trade and Industry, Norway (2007)
Stiefel, R.C.: Electronic voting system. Soc. Econ. Plan. Sci. 4(1), 33–39 (1970). doi:10.1016/0038-0121(70)90027-3
Beroggi, G.E.G.: Secure and easy internet voting. Computer 41(2), 52–56 (2008)
Qadah, G.Z., Taha, R.: Electronic voting systems: requirements, design, and implementation. Comput. Stand. Interf. 29(3), 376–386 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.csi.2006.06.001
Kenski, K.: To I-vote or not to I-vote? Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 23(3), 293–303 (2005). doi:10.1177/0894439305275851
Herrnson, P.S., Niemi, R.G., Hanmer, M.J., Bederson, B.B., Conrad, F.G., Traugott, M.: The importance of usability testing of voting systems. In: Proceedings of the USENIX/Accurate Electronic Voting Technology Workshop 2006 on Electronic Voting Technology Workshop, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2006. USENIX Association, pp. 3–3. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/642611.642638
Yao, Y., Murphy, L.: Remote electronic voting systems: an exploration of voters’ perceptions and intention to use. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 16(2), 106–120 (2007). doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000672
Smith, A.D.: Acceptability of internet voting and CRM principles among the internet savvy. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 3(5), 498–528 (2008). doi:10.1504/IJBIS.2008.018601
Byrne, M.D., Greene, K.K., Everett, S.P.: Usability of voting systems: baseline data for paper, punch cards, and lever machines. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA (2007)
Bederson, B.B., Lee, B., Sherman, R.M., Herrnson, P.S., Niemi, R.G.: Electronic voting system usability issues. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 2003. ACM, pp. 145–152. doi:10.1145/642611.642638
Conrad, F.G., Bederson, B.B., Lewis, B., Peytcheva, E., Traugott, M.W., Hanmer, M.J., Herrnson, P.S., Niemi, R.G.: Electronic voting eliminates hanging chads but introduces new usability challenges. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67(1), 111–124 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.010
Felten, E.: Finnish Court Orders Re-Vote After E-Voting Snafu. Princeton’s Center for Information Technology Policy (2009). http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/felten/finnish-court-orders-re-vote-after-e-voting-snafu. Accessed July 2009
Gilbert, J., McMillian, Y., Rouse, K., Williams, P., Rogers, G., McClendon, J., Mitchell, W., Gupta, P., Mkpong-Ruffin, I., Cross, E.: Universal access in e-voting for the blind. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 1–9 (2010). doi:10.1007/s10209-009-0181-0
Smith, B., Laskowski, S., Lowry, S.: Implications of Graphics on Usability and Accessibility for the Voter. In: Ryan, P., Schoenmakers, B. (eds) E-Voting and Identity, vol 5767. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 54–74. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04135-8_4
Little, L., Storer, T., Briggs, P., Duncan, I.: E-voting in an Ubicomp world. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 26(1), 44–59 (2008). doi:10.1177/0894439307307683
Kopackova, H., Michalek, K., Cejna, K.: Accessibility and findability of local e-government websites in the Czech Republic. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 9(1), 51–61 (2010). doi:0.1007/s10209-009-0159-y
Dumas, J.S., Redish, J.C.: A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Revised edition, Intellect Books, Oregon, USA (1999). ISBN: 1-84150-020-8
Molich, R., Ede, M.R., Kaasgaard, K., Karyukin, B.: Comparative usability evaluation. Behav. Inf. Tech. 23(1), 65–74 (2004)
Law, C., Yi, J., Choi, Y., Jacko, J.: A systematic examination of universal design resources: part 2, analysis of the development process. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 7(1–2), 55–77 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10209-007-0100-1
Law, C., Yi, J., Choi, Y., Jacko, J.: A systematic examination of universal design resources: part 1, heuristic evaluation. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 7(1), 31–54 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10209-007-0100-1
Grudin, J., Pruitt, J.: Personas, participatory design and product development: an infrastructure for engagement. In: Proceedings of Participation and Design Conference (PDC2002), Sweden, pp. 144–161 (2002)
Lindgren, A., Chen, F., Amdahl, P., Chaikiat, P.: Using Personas and Scenarios as an Interface Design. Tool for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part II, HCII 2007, pp. 460–469. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007)
Zimmermann, G., Vanderheiden, G.: Accessible design and testing in the application development process: considerations for an integrated approach. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 7(1–2), 117–128 (2007). doi:10.1007/s10209-007-0108-6
Mankoff, J., Fait, H., Tran, T.: Is your web page accessible? A comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2005. ACM. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1054979
Koutsabasis, P., Vlachogiannis, E., Darzentas, J.S.: Beyond specifications: towards a practical methodology for evaluating web accessibility. J. Usability Stud. 5(4), 157–171 (2010)
Rømen, D., Svanæs, D.: Validating WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 through Usability Testing with Disabled Users. Paper presented at the Unitech 2010, Oslo (Norway) May 2010
Fuglerud, K.S.: ICT Services for Every Citizen: The Challenge of Gaps in User Knowledge. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Addressing Diversity. Part I: Held as Part of HCI International 2009, San Diego, CA, USA, 19-24 July 2009. 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pp. 38–47. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02707-9_5
Solheim, I.: Adaptive user interfaces: benefit or impediment for lower-literacy users? In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference in Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Part II: Intelligent and Ubiquitous Interaction Environments, San Diego, CA, 2009, pp. 758–765. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_84
Fuglerud, K.S., Reinertsen, A., Fritsch, L., Dale, Ø.: Universal Design of IT-Based Solutions for Registration and Authentication. DART/02/09. Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo (2009)
Fuglerud, K.S., Halbach, T., Dale, Ø., Solheim, I., Schultz, T.: Accessibility and Usability Evaluation of E-Vote Prototypes. Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo (2009)
Shneiderman, B.: Promoting universal usability with multi-layer interface design. In: CUU 2003, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2003. ACM, pp. 1–8. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/957205.957206
E-vote 2011 (2009) Use case specification: 2.1 E-voting: Project: E-vote 2011. Systems specification document. Norwegian ministry of local government and regional development
Fritsch, L., Fuglerud, K., Solheim, I.: Towards inclusive identity management. Identity in the Information Society Online First™, 7 October 2010:1–24
Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Borderline Issues: Social and material aspects of design. Human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 9(1):3–36 (1994). doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0901_2
Acknowledgments
We want to thank the E-vote 2011 project for our engagement in this evaluation of the usability and accessibility of the prototypes under consideration. We also acknowledge the help of the user organizations in order to recruit participants for user testing. Our gratitude also goes to the testing participants who provided us with valuable insight. Special thanks to our co-workers and colleagues in the project, Ivar Solheim, Øystein Dale and Trenton Schultz. This paper is partly funded by the Norwegian Research Council, mostly through the e-Me project. Finally, we thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us in improving the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuglerud, K.S., Røssvoll, T.H. An evaluation of web-based voting usability and accessibility. Univ Access Inf Soc 11, 359–373 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0253-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0253-9