Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhancing students’ botanical learning by using augmented reality

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific literacy is considered a crucial part of learners’ basic capacities. In primary schools, scientific literacy is generally cultivated through the implementation of a natural science curriculum, in which botany is an essential course. To enhance learning effectiveness, learning activities that involve observing specific plants and carried out in outdoor learning environments have been widely adopted in instructional design. Augmented reality (AR) technology can provide views of the real-world environment simulated by a computer in connection with a target learning object. Hence, AR-based learning material was employed in this study to provide multifaceted views of plants being studied, thereby enhancing the learning experience. To validate the effectiveness of this approach, 54 third-grade students were recruited as participants in a plant observation activity that involved various learning materials. Their learning outcomes when using AR were measured according to Bloom’s cognitive levels, showing the degree of learning achievement for different stages. According to the results, students in the experimental group observing the plants through AR had significantly greater comprehension compared with those in the control group, with respect to conceptual analysis and identification of leaf arrangement. The findings suggest that compared with the traditional learning approach involving plant observation, AR-based learning material could significantly enhance students’ higher-level cognitive capabilities, enabling them to more effectively scaffold knowledge about target plants in the observational learning activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeBoer, G.E.: Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 37, 582–601 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. He, J., Van De Vijver, F.J.: Effects of a general response style on cross-cultural comparisons evidence from the teaching and learning international survey. Public Opin. Q. 79, 267–290 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fensham, P.: Programme for international student assessment (PISA). Encycl. Sci. Educ. 799–801 (2015)

  4. Schussler, E.E.: From flowers to fruits: how children’s books represent plant reproduction. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 30, 1677–1696 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. OBE, W.H., Qualter, A.: The Teaching of Science in Primary Schools. David Fulton Publishers, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, S.L., Chen, C.C., Zhang, Z.G.: A context-aware knowledge map to support ubiquitous learning activities for a u-Botanical museum. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 31, 470–485 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gerber, B.L., Cavallo, A.M., Marek, E.A.: Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. Int J. Sci Educ. 23, 535–549 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Law, K.M., Lee, V.C., Yu, Y.T.: Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Comput. Educ. 55, 218–228 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sung, H.Y., Hwang, G.J.: A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Comput. Educ. 63, 43–51 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., Vavoula, G.: A theory of learning for the mobile age. In: Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen, pp. 87–99. Springer, Berlin (2010)

  11. Huang, Y.M., Lin, Y.T., Cheng, S.C.: Effectiveness of a mobile plant learning system in a science curriculum in Taiwanese elementary education. Comput. Educ. 54, 47–58 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lai, C.H., Yang, J.C., Chen, F.C., Ho, C.W., Chan, T.W.: Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: the interplay of technology and pedagogical practices. J. Comput. Assist. Lear. 23, 326–337 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sommerauer, P., Müller, O.: Augmented reality in informal learning environments: a field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Comput. Educ. 79, 59–68 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Çepni, S., Taş, E., Köse, S.: The effects of computer-assisted material on students’ cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Comput. Educ. 46, 192–205 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mikkilä-Erdmann, M.: Improving conceptual change concerning photosynthesis through text design. Learn. Instr. 11, 241–257 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tas, E., Cepni, S., Kaya, E.: The effects of web-supported and classical concept maps on students’ cognitive development and misconception change: a case study on photosynthesis. Energy Educ. Sci. Technol. Part B 4, 241–252 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson, L., Krathwohl, R., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York, NY (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., Mitchell, R.: Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18, 7–22 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klopfer, E., Sheldon, J.: Augmenting your own reality: student authoring of science-based augmented reality games. New Directions Youth Dev. 128, 85–94 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wojciechowski, R., Cellary, W.: Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Comput. Educ. 68, 570–585 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Krevelen, D., Poelman, R.: A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. Int. J. Virtual Real. 9, 1 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6, 355–385 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuen, S., Yaoyuneyong, G., Johnson, E.: Augmented reality: an overview and five directions for AR in education. J. Educ. Technol. Dev. Exch. 4, 119–140 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shelton, B.E., Hedley, N.R.: Exploring a cognitive basis for learning spatial relationships with augmented reality. Technol. Instr. Cognit. Learn. 1, 323–357 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaufmann, H., Steinbügl, K., Dünser, A., Glück, J.: General training of spatial abilities by geometry education in augmented reality. Ann. Rev. CyberTherapy Telemed.: A Decade of VR 3, 65–76 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M.B., Kloos, C.D.: Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Comput. Educ. 68, 586–596 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang, T.C., Chen, C.C., Chou, Y.W.: Animating eco-education: to see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Comput. Educ. 96, 72–82 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Arvanitis, T.N., Petrou, A., Knight, J.F., Savas, S., Sotiriou, S., Gargalakos, M., Gialouri, E.: Human factors and qualitative pedagogical evaluation of a mobile augmented reality system for science education used by learners with physical disabilities. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 13, 243–250 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Klopfer, E., Squire, K.: Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. ETR&D-EDUC Technol. Res. 56, 203–228 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Squire, K., Klopfer, E.: Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. J. Learn. Sci. 16, 371–413 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D.: Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Comput. Graph. 27, 339–345 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kamarainen, A.M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M.S., Dede, C.: EcoMOBILE: integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Comput. Educ. 68, 545–556 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hwang, W.Y., Shadiev, R.: Cognitive diffusion model with user-oriented context-to- text recognition for learning to promote high level cognitive processes. Knowl. Manag. E-Learn. 6, 30–48 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Young, M.R.: Experiential learning = hands-on + minds-on. Mark. Educ. Rev. 12, 43–51 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chaillé, C., Britain, L.: The Young Child as Scientist: A Constructivist Approach to Early Childhood Science Education. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roussou, M.: Learning by doing and learning through play: an exploration of interactivity in virtual environments for children. Comput. Entertain. 2, 10 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dunlap, J., Dobrovolny, J., Young, D.: Preparing e-learning designers using Kolb’s model of experiential learning. Innov. J. Online Educ. 4, 1–6 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. Longman, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hwang, W.Y., Wang, C.Y., Hwang, G.J., Huang, Y.M., Huang, S.: A web-based programming learning environment to support cognitive development. Interact. Comput. 20, 524–534 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.Y., Huang, Y.M., Liu, T.Y.: Cognitive diffusion model: facilitating EFL learning in an authentic environment. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10, 168–181 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Krathwohl, D.R.: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theor. Pract. 41, 212–218 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. StatSoft I: Electronic Statistics Textbook. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/ (2011). Accessed August 2 2011

  44. Wu, H.K., Lee, S.W.Y., Chang, H.Y., Liang, J.C.: Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput. Educ. 62, 41–49 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., Ross, G.: The role of tutoring in problem solving. J. Child Psychol. Psyc 17, 89–100 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hornecker, E., Dünser, A.: Of pages and paddles: children’s expectations and mistaken interactions with physical–digital tools. Interact. Comput. 21, 95–107 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M.: Evaluating the usability of an augmented reality based educational application. In: International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp 296–306. Springer, Berlin (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. under Contracts Nos. MOST 105-2622-S-006-001-CC2, MOST 103-2511-S-006-007-MY3, MOST 103-2511-S-006-002-MY3, MOST 104-2511-S-224-003 -MY3, and MOST 105-2628-S-224 -001 -MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting-Ting Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chien, YC., Su, YN., Wu, TT. et al. Enhancing students’ botanical learning by using augmented reality. Univ Access Inf Soc 18, 231–241 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0590-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0590-4

Keywords

Navigation